-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of Bypass and Non-Bypass Surgical Treatments for Internal Carotid Artery Blood Blister-Like Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes
V. Balik, P. Kourilova, IJ. Sulla, J. Vrbkova, J. Srovnal, I. Sulla, S. Talari
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, systematický přehled
- MeSH
- aneurysma chirurgie MeSH
- bezpečnost pacientů MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nemoci arterie carotis chirurgie MeSH
- neurochirurgické výkony škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- revaskularizace mozku metody MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical strategy for treating internal carotid artery (ICA) blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) has remained unclear. Although some have preferred bypass surgery, others have favored less-demanding surgical methods. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of bypass and non-bypass surgical methods when intended as primary treatment of ICA BBAs. METHODS: Studies reporting data on the outcomes of interest for surgically treated patients with ICA BBAs were searched for in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Cochrane Central, ProQuest, and Scopus databases. The data were analyzed using random effects modeling. RESULTS: Seven observational studies involving 140 patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients treated with bypass surgery, compared with those treated with non-bypass techniques, had lower odds of poor outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-2.02; P = 0.57; I2 = 0%), postoperative vasospasm (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.38-7.92; P = 0.48; I2 = 19%), intraoperative bleeding (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 0.82-13.90; P = 0.09; I2 = 0%), postoperative bleeding (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.47-7.76; P = 0.36; I2 = 0%), and postoperative recurrence of BBAs (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 0.54-8.66; P < 0.28; I2 = 0%). No comparison, however, achieved statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: For surgeons who use both bypass and non-bypass surgical strategies, the 2 methods seemed comparable in terms of the outcomes of interest, although the bypass technique appeared superior. However, comparisons with studies reporting bypass as the uniquely preferred technique have indicated that specialization in, and preference for, the bypass procedure has been associated with more favorable outcomes.
Department of Neurosurgery Care Hospitals Visakhapatnam India
Department of Neurosurgery Svet Zdravia Hospital Michalovce Michalovce Slovak Republic
Institute of Neurobiology Slovak Academy of Sciences Košice Slovak Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21019776
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830101355.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.089 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32829023
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Balik, Vladimir $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Department of Neurosurgery, Svet Zdravia Hospital Michalovce, Michalovce, Slovak Republic. Electronic address: balik.vladimir@gmail.com
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of Bypass and Non-Bypass Surgical Treatments for Internal Carotid Artery Blood Blister-Like Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes / $c V. Balik, P. Kourilova, IJ. Sulla, J. Vrbkova, J. Srovnal, I. Sulla, S. Talari
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical strategy for treating internal carotid artery (ICA) blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) has remained unclear. Although some have preferred bypass surgery, others have favored less-demanding surgical methods. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of bypass and non-bypass surgical methods when intended as primary treatment of ICA BBAs. METHODS: Studies reporting data on the outcomes of interest for surgically treated patients with ICA BBAs were searched for in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Cochrane Central, ProQuest, and Scopus databases. The data were analyzed using random effects modeling. RESULTS: Seven observational studies involving 140 patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients treated with bypass surgery, compared with those treated with non-bypass techniques, had lower odds of poor outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-2.02; P = 0.57; I2 = 0%), postoperative vasospasm (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.38-7.92; P = 0.48; I2 = 19%), intraoperative bleeding (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 0.82-13.90; P = 0.09; I2 = 0%), postoperative bleeding (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.47-7.76; P = 0.36; I2 = 0%), and postoperative recurrence of BBAs (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 0.54-8.66; P < 0.28; I2 = 0%). No comparison, however, achieved statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: For surgeons who use both bypass and non-bypass surgical strategies, the 2 methods seemed comparable in terms of the outcomes of interest, although the bypass technique appeared superior. However, comparisons with studies reporting bypass as the uniquely preferred technique have indicated that specialization in, and preference for, the bypass procedure has been associated with more favorable outcomes.
- 650 _2
- $a aneurysma $x chirurgie $7 D000783
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci arterie carotis $x chirurgie $7 D002340
- 650 _2
- $a revaskularizace mozku $x metody $7 D002548
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a neurochirurgické výkony $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D019635
- 650 _2
- $a bezpečnost pacientů $7 D061214
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 700 1_
- $a Kourilova, Pavla $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sulla, Igor J $u Institute of Neurobiology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovak Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vrbkova, Jana $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Srovnal, Josef $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sulla, Igor $u Department of Anatomy, Histology and Physiology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, Kosice, Slovak Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Talari, Sandeep $u Department of Neurosurgery, Care Hospitals, Visakhapatnam, India
- 773 0_
- $w MED00167613 $t World neurosurgery $x 1878-8769 $g Roč. 144, č. - (2020), s. 283-292.e12
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32829023 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830101355 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690561 $s 1140222
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 144 $c - $d 283-292.e12 $e 20200821 $i 1878-8769 $m World neurosurgery $n World Neurosurg $x MED00167613
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728