• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of Bypass and Non-Bypass Surgical Treatments for Internal Carotid Artery Blood Blister-Like Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes

V. Balik, P. Kourilova, IJ. Sulla, J. Vrbkova, J. Srovnal, I. Sulla, S. Talari

. 2020 ; 144 (-) : 283-292.e12. [pub] 20200821

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, systematický přehled

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21019776

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical strategy for treating internal carotid artery (ICA) blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) has remained unclear. Although some have preferred bypass surgery, others have favored less-demanding surgical methods. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of bypass and non-bypass surgical methods when intended as primary treatment of ICA BBAs. METHODS: Studies reporting data on the outcomes of interest for surgically treated patients with ICA BBAs were searched for in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Cochrane Central, ProQuest, and Scopus databases. The data were analyzed using random effects modeling. RESULTS: Seven observational studies involving 140 patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients treated with bypass surgery, compared with those treated with non-bypass techniques, had lower odds of poor outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-2.02; P = 0.57; I2 = 0%), postoperative vasospasm (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.38-7.92; P = 0.48; I2 = 19%), intraoperative bleeding (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 0.82-13.90; P = 0.09; I2 = 0%), postoperative bleeding (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.47-7.76; P = 0.36; I2 = 0%), and postoperative recurrence of BBAs (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 0.54-8.66; P < 0.28; I2 = 0%). No comparison, however, achieved statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: For surgeons who use both bypass and non-bypass surgical strategies, the 2 methods seemed comparable in terms of the outcomes of interest, although the bypass technique appeared superior. However, comparisons with studies reporting bypass as the uniquely preferred technique have indicated that specialization in, and preference for, the bypass procedure has been associated with more favorable outcomes.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21019776
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830101355.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.089 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32829023
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Balik, Vladimir $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Department of Neurosurgery, Svet Zdravia Hospital Michalovce, Michalovce, Slovak Republic. Electronic address: balik.vladimir@gmail.com
245    10
$a Comparison of Bypass and Non-Bypass Surgical Treatments for Internal Carotid Artery Blood Blister-Like Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes / $c V. Balik, P. Kourilova, IJ. Sulla, J. Vrbkova, J. Srovnal, I. Sulla, S. Talari
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical strategy for treating internal carotid artery (ICA) blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) has remained unclear. Although some have preferred bypass surgery, others have favored less-demanding surgical methods. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of bypass and non-bypass surgical methods when intended as primary treatment of ICA BBAs. METHODS: Studies reporting data on the outcomes of interest for surgically treated patients with ICA BBAs were searched for in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Cochrane Central, ProQuest, and Scopus databases. The data were analyzed using random effects modeling. RESULTS: Seven observational studies involving 140 patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients treated with bypass surgery, compared with those treated with non-bypass techniques, had lower odds of poor outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-2.02; P = 0.57; I2 = 0%), postoperative vasospasm (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.38-7.92; P = 0.48; I2 = 19%), intraoperative bleeding (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 0.82-13.90; P = 0.09; I2 = 0%), postoperative bleeding (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.47-7.76; P = 0.36; I2 = 0%), and postoperative recurrence of BBAs (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 0.54-8.66; P < 0.28; I2 = 0%). No comparison, however, achieved statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: For surgeons who use both bypass and non-bypass surgical strategies, the 2 methods seemed comparable in terms of the outcomes of interest, although the bypass technique appeared superior. However, comparisons with studies reporting bypass as the uniquely preferred technique have indicated that specialization in, and preference for, the bypass procedure has been associated with more favorable outcomes.
650    _2
$a aneurysma $x chirurgie $7 D000783
650    _2
$a nemoci arterie carotis $x chirurgie $7 D002340
650    _2
$a revaskularizace mozku $x metody $7 D002548
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a neurochirurgické výkony $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D019635
650    _2
$a bezpečnost pacientů $7 D061214
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Kourilova, Pavla $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sulla, Igor J $u Institute of Neurobiology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovak Republic
700    1_
$a Vrbkova, Jana $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Srovnal, Josef $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sulla, Igor $u Department of Anatomy, Histology and Physiology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, Kosice, Slovak Republic
700    1_
$a Talari, Sandeep $u Department of Neurosurgery, Care Hospitals, Visakhapatnam, India
773    0_
$w MED00167613 $t World neurosurgery $x 1878-8769 $g Roč. 144, č. - (2020), s. 283-292.e12
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32829023 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830101355 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1690561 $s 1140222
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 144 $c - $d 283-292.e12 $e 20200821 $i 1878-8769 $m World neurosurgery $n World Neurosurg $x MED00167613
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...