-
Something wrong with this record ?
Lymphatic Transport of Drugs after Intestinal Absorption: Impact of Drug Formulation and Physicochemical Properties
P. Ryšánek, T. Grus, M. Šíma, O. Slanař
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2010-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Administration, Oral MeSH
- Biological Availability MeSH
- Biological Transport physiology MeSH
- Databases, Bibliographic MeSH
- Pharmacokinetics MeSH
- Intestinal Absorption MeSH
- Pharmaceutical Preparations MeSH
- Drug Delivery Systems MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lymphatic System metabolism MeSH
- Models, Animal MeSH
- Drug Compounding methods statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview focusing on the extent of lymphatic transport of drugs following intestinal absorption and to summarize available data on the impact of molecular weight, lipophilicity, formulation and prandial state. METHODS: Literature was searched for in vivo studies quantifying extent of lymphatic transport of drugs after enteral dosing. Pharmacokinetic data were extracted and summarized. Influence of molecular weight, log P, formulation and prandial state was analyzed using relative bioavailability via lymph (FRL) as the parameter for comparison. The methods and animal models used in the studies were also summarized. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic data on lymphatic transport were available for 103 drugs. Significantly higher FRL [median (IQR)] was observed in advanced lipid based formulations [54.4% (52.0)] and oil solutions [38.9% (60.8)] compared to simple formulations [2.0% (27.1)], p < 0.0001 and p = 0.004, respectively. Advanced lipid based formulations also provided substantial FRL in drugs with log P < 5, which was not observed in simple formulations and oil solutions. No relation was found between FRL and molecular weight. There were 10 distinct methods used for in vivo testing of lymphatic transport after intestinal absorption so far. CONCLUSION: Advanced lipid based formulations provide superior ability to increase lymphatic absorption in drugs of various molecular weights and in drugs with moderate to low lipophilicity.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21020264
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830101900.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s11095-020-02858-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32770268
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Ryšánek, Pavel $u Institute of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. pavel.rysanek@lf1.cuni.cz
- 245 10
- $a Lymphatic Transport of Drugs after Intestinal Absorption: Impact of Drug Formulation and Physicochemical Properties / $c P. Ryšánek, T. Grus, M. Šíma, O. Slanař
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview focusing on the extent of lymphatic transport of drugs following intestinal absorption and to summarize available data on the impact of molecular weight, lipophilicity, formulation and prandial state. METHODS: Literature was searched for in vivo studies quantifying extent of lymphatic transport of drugs after enteral dosing. Pharmacokinetic data were extracted and summarized. Influence of molecular weight, log P, formulation and prandial state was analyzed using relative bioavailability via lymph (FRL) as the parameter for comparison. The methods and animal models used in the studies were also summarized. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic data on lymphatic transport were available for 103 drugs. Significantly higher FRL [median (IQR)] was observed in advanced lipid based formulations [54.4% (52.0)] and oil solutions [38.9% (60.8)] compared to simple formulations [2.0% (27.1)], p < 0.0001 and p = 0.004, respectively. Advanced lipid based formulations also provided substantial FRL in drugs with log P < 5, which was not observed in simple formulations and oil solutions. No relation was found between FRL and molecular weight. There were 10 distinct methods used for in vivo testing of lymphatic transport after intestinal absorption so far. CONCLUSION: Advanced lipid based formulations provide superior ability to increase lymphatic absorption in drugs of various molecular weights and in drugs with moderate to low lipophilicity.
- 650 _2
- $a aplikace orální $7 D000284
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a biologická dostupnost $7 D001682
- 650 _2
- $a biologický transport $x fyziologie $7 D001692
- 650 _2
- $a databáze bibliografické $7 D016206
- 650 _2
- $a příprava léků $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D004339
- 650 _2
- $a lékové transportní systémy $7 D016503
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a intestinální absorpce $7 D007408
- 650 _2
- $a lymfatický systém $x metabolismus $7 D008208
- 650 _2
- $a modely u zvířat $7 D023421
- 650 _2
- $a léčivé přípravky $7 D004364
- 650 _2
- $a farmakokinetika $7 D010599
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Grus, Tomáš $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Šíma, Martin $u Institute of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Slanař, Ondřej $u Institute of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003779 $t Pharmaceutical research $x 1573-904X $g Roč. 37, č. 9 (2020), s. 166
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32770268 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830101900 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690944 $s 1140710
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 37 $c 9 $d 166 $e 20200807 $i 1573-904X $m Pharmaceutical research $n Pharm Res $x MED00003779
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728