-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Impact of sentinel lymph node frozen section evaluation to avoid combined treatment in early-stage cervical cancer
L. Dostalek, J. Slama, D. Fisherova, R. Kocian, A. Germanova, F. Fruhauf, L. Dusek, P. Dundr, K. Nemejcova, J. Jarkovsky, D. Cibula
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2018-01-01 do 2024-12-31
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2018-01-01 do 2024-12-31
PubMed
32276933
DOI
10.1136/ijgc-2019-001113
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- algoritmy MeSH
- dodržování směrnic statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- karcinom patologie terapie MeSH
- kombinovaná terapie statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lymfatické metastázy MeSH
- nádory děložního čípku patologie terapie MeSH
- peroperační péče MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- sentinelová uzlina patologie chirurgie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: The need for radical surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation may be reduced by abandoning radical surgery in patients in whom lymph node involvement is detected intra-operatively. OBJECTIVES: To analyze, in a retrospective cohort study, the efficacy of the algorithm using intra-operative pathological assessment of sentinel lymph nodes. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution study was carried out, which analyzed data from all consecutive patients with cervical cancer who were referred for primary surgical treatment between May 2005 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) TNM stage T1a1 with lymphovascular space invasion, T1a2, T1b, T2a, and selected T2b with incipient parametrial invasion; (2) adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma; (3) no evidence of enlarged suspicious nodes or distant metastases on pre-operative imaging; (4) primary surgery with curative intent; (5) successful detection of sentinel lymph node, at least, unilaterally. All patients had at least one sentinel lymph node detected and submitted for frozen section evaluation. When sentinel lymph node involvement was detected intra-operatively, the cervical procedure was abandoned and the patient was referred for definitive chemoradiation. Radical surgery was completed in patients with intra-operative negative sentinel lymph nodes. The reliability of intra-operative sentinel lymph node assessment was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio. RESULTS: The study included a total of 309 patients. Sentinel lymph nodes were detected bilaterally in 86% of the patients. Lymph node positivity was detected intra-operatively in 18 (6%) patients in whom the cervical procedure was abandoned. Adjuvant radiotherapy after completed radical surgery was given to 29 (9%) patients, including 20 patients with macrometastases (8) or micrometastases (12) reported from the final histology, eight patients with positive parametria (all ≤3 mm), and one patient with a positive vaginal resection margin. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the intra-operative detection of lymph node positivity (macrometastases or micrometastases) was 47% (95% CI 31% to 64%), 100%, 100%, and 93% (95% CI 90% to 96%), respectively. A total of 18 (6%) patients were spared combined treatment owing to the intra-operative sentinel lymph node triage; 29 patients (9%) received combined treatment with both radical surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy CONCLUSIONS: Of 47 patients with high-risk prognostic risk factors (lymph node, parametria, or surgical margin involvement), combined treatment was successfully avoided in 18 (38%). Despite an effort to triage the patients intra-operatively, 9% received a combination of cervical procedure and adjuvant chemoradiation, mostly owing to the low sensitivity of the frozen section in the detection of micrometastases and macrometastases.
Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses
Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21020495
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830102144.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1136/ijgc-2019-001113 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32276933
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Dostalek, Lukas $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Impact of sentinel lymph node frozen section evaluation to avoid combined treatment in early-stage cervical cancer / $c L. Dostalek, J. Slama, D. Fisherova, R. Kocian, A. Germanova, F. Fruhauf, L. Dusek, P. Dundr, K. Nemejcova, J. Jarkovsky, D. Cibula
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The need for radical surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation may be reduced by abandoning radical surgery in patients in whom lymph node involvement is detected intra-operatively. OBJECTIVES: To analyze, in a retrospective cohort study, the efficacy of the algorithm using intra-operative pathological assessment of sentinel lymph nodes. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution study was carried out, which analyzed data from all consecutive patients with cervical cancer who were referred for primary surgical treatment between May 2005 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) TNM stage T1a1 with lymphovascular space invasion, T1a2, T1b, T2a, and selected T2b with incipient parametrial invasion; (2) adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma; (3) no evidence of enlarged suspicious nodes or distant metastases on pre-operative imaging; (4) primary surgery with curative intent; (5) successful detection of sentinel lymph node, at least, unilaterally. All patients had at least one sentinel lymph node detected and submitted for frozen section evaluation. When sentinel lymph node involvement was detected intra-operatively, the cervical procedure was abandoned and the patient was referred for definitive chemoradiation. Radical surgery was completed in patients with intra-operative negative sentinel lymph nodes. The reliability of intra-operative sentinel lymph node assessment was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio. RESULTS: The study included a total of 309 patients. Sentinel lymph nodes were detected bilaterally in 86% of the patients. Lymph node positivity was detected intra-operatively in 18 (6%) patients in whom the cervical procedure was abandoned. Adjuvant radiotherapy after completed radical surgery was given to 29 (9%) patients, including 20 patients with macrometastases (8) or micrometastases (12) reported from the final histology, eight patients with positive parametria (all ≤3 mm), and one patient with a positive vaginal resection margin. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the intra-operative detection of lymph node positivity (macrometastases or micrometastases) was 47% (95% CI 31% to 64%), 100%, 100%, and 93% (95% CI 90% to 96%), respectively. A total of 18 (6%) patients were spared combined treatment owing to the intra-operative sentinel lymph node triage; 29 patients (9%) received combined treatment with both radical surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy CONCLUSIONS: Of 47 patients with high-risk prognostic risk factors (lymph node, parametria, or surgical margin involvement), combined treatment was successfully avoided in 18 (38%). Despite an effort to triage the patients intra-operatively, 9% received a combination of cervical procedure and adjuvant chemoradiation, mostly owing to the low sensitivity of the frozen section in the detection of micrometastases and macrometastases.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a algoritmy $7 D000465
- 650 _2
- $a karcinom $x patologie $x terapie $7 D002277
- 650 _2
- $a kombinovaná terapie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D003131
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a dodržování směrnic $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D019983
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a peroperační péče $7 D007430
- 650 _2
- $a lymfatické metastázy $7 D008207
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a sentinelová uzlina $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D000071036
- 650 _2
- $a nádory děložního čípku $x patologie $x terapie $7 D002583
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Slama, Jiri $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Fisherova, Daniela $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kocian, Roman $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Germanova, Anna $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Fruhauf, Filip $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dusek, Ladislav $u Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dundr, Pavel $u Department of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Nemejcova, Kristyna $u Department of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jarkovsky, Jiri $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses; Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Cibula, David $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic d_cibula@yahoo.com
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009896 $t International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society $x 1525-1438 $g Roč. 30, č. 6 (2020), s. 744-748
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32276933 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830102145 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1691129 $s 1140941
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 30 $c 6 $d 744-748 $e 20200409 $i 1525-1438 $m International journal of gynecological cancer $n Int J Gynecol Cancer $x MED00009896
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728