Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Impact of sentinel lymph node frozen section evaluation to avoid combined treatment in early-stage cervical cancer

L. Dostalek, J. Slama, D. Fisherova, R. Kocian, A. Germanova, F. Fruhauf, L. Dusek, P. Dundr, K. Nemejcova, J. Jarkovsky, D. Cibula

. 2020 ; 30 (6) : 744-748. [pub] 20200409

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21020495

BACKGROUND: The need for radical surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation may be reduced by abandoning radical surgery in patients in whom lymph node involvement is detected intra-operatively. OBJECTIVES: To analyze, in a retrospective cohort study, the efficacy of the algorithm using intra-operative pathological assessment of sentinel lymph nodes. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution study was carried out, which analyzed data from all consecutive patients with cervical cancer who were referred for primary surgical treatment between May 2005 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) TNM stage T1a1 with lymphovascular space invasion, T1a2, T1b, T2a, and selected T2b with incipient parametrial invasion; (2) adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma; (3) no evidence of enlarged suspicious nodes or distant metastases on pre-operative imaging; (4) primary surgery with curative intent; (5) successful detection of sentinel lymph node, at least, unilaterally. All patients had at least one sentinel lymph node detected and submitted for frozen section evaluation. When sentinel lymph node involvement was detected intra-operatively, the cervical procedure was abandoned and the patient was referred for definitive chemoradiation. Radical surgery was completed in patients with intra-operative negative sentinel lymph nodes. The reliability of intra-operative sentinel lymph node assessment was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio. RESULTS: The study included a total of 309 patients. Sentinel lymph nodes were detected bilaterally in 86% of the patients. Lymph node positivity was detected intra-operatively in 18 (6%) patients in whom the cervical procedure was abandoned. Adjuvant radiotherapy after completed radical surgery was given to 29 (9%) patients, including 20 patients with macrometastases (8) or micrometastases (12) reported from the final histology, eight patients with positive parametria (all ≤3 mm), and one patient with a positive vaginal resection margin. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the intra-operative detection of lymph node positivity (macrometastases or micrometastases) was 47% (95% CI 31% to 64%), 100%, 100%, and 93% (95% CI 90% to 96%), respectively. A total of 18 (6%) patients were spared combined treatment owing to the intra-operative sentinel lymph node triage; 29 patients (9%) received combined treatment with both radical surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy CONCLUSIONS: Of 47 patients with high-risk prognostic risk factors (lymph node, parametria, or surgical margin involvement), combined treatment was successfully avoided in 18 (38%). Despite an effort to triage the patients intra-operatively, 9% received a combination of cervical procedure and adjuvant chemoradiation, mostly owing to the low sensitivity of the frozen section in the detection of micrometastases and macrometastases.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21020495
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830102144.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1136/ijgc-2019-001113 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32276933
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Dostalek, Lukas $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Impact of sentinel lymph node frozen section evaluation to avoid combined treatment in early-stage cervical cancer / $c L. Dostalek, J. Slama, D. Fisherova, R. Kocian, A. Germanova, F. Fruhauf, L. Dusek, P. Dundr, K. Nemejcova, J. Jarkovsky, D. Cibula
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The need for radical surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation may be reduced by abandoning radical surgery in patients in whom lymph node involvement is detected intra-operatively. OBJECTIVES: To analyze, in a retrospective cohort study, the efficacy of the algorithm using intra-operative pathological assessment of sentinel lymph nodes. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution study was carried out, which analyzed data from all consecutive patients with cervical cancer who were referred for primary surgical treatment between May 2005 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) TNM stage T1a1 with lymphovascular space invasion, T1a2, T1b, T2a, and selected T2b with incipient parametrial invasion; (2) adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma; (3) no evidence of enlarged suspicious nodes or distant metastases on pre-operative imaging; (4) primary surgery with curative intent; (5) successful detection of sentinel lymph node, at least, unilaterally. All patients had at least one sentinel lymph node detected and submitted for frozen section evaluation. When sentinel lymph node involvement was detected intra-operatively, the cervical procedure was abandoned and the patient was referred for definitive chemoradiation. Radical surgery was completed in patients with intra-operative negative sentinel lymph nodes. The reliability of intra-operative sentinel lymph node assessment was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio. RESULTS: The study included a total of 309 patients. Sentinel lymph nodes were detected bilaterally in 86% of the patients. Lymph node positivity was detected intra-operatively in 18 (6%) patients in whom the cervical procedure was abandoned. Adjuvant radiotherapy after completed radical surgery was given to 29 (9%) patients, including 20 patients with macrometastases (8) or micrometastases (12) reported from the final histology, eight patients with positive parametria (all ≤3 mm), and one patient with a positive vaginal resection margin. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the intra-operative detection of lymph node positivity (macrometastases or micrometastases) was 47% (95% CI 31% to 64%), 100%, 100%, and 93% (95% CI 90% to 96%), respectively. A total of 18 (6%) patients were spared combined treatment owing to the intra-operative sentinel lymph node triage; 29 patients (9%) received combined treatment with both radical surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy CONCLUSIONS: Of 47 patients with high-risk prognostic risk factors (lymph node, parametria, or surgical margin involvement), combined treatment was successfully avoided in 18 (38%). Despite an effort to triage the patients intra-operatively, 9% received a combination of cervical procedure and adjuvant chemoradiation, mostly owing to the low sensitivity of the frozen section in the detection of micrometastases and macrometastases.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    _2
$a karcinom $x patologie $x terapie $7 D002277
650    _2
$a kombinovaná terapie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D003131
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a dodržování směrnic $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D019983
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a peroperační péče $7 D007430
650    _2
$a lymfatické metastázy $7 D008207
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a sentinelová uzlina $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D000071036
650    _2
$a nádory děložního čípku $x patologie $x terapie $7 D002583
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Slama, Jiri $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Fisherova, Daniela $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kocian, Roman $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Germanova, Anna $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Fruhauf, Filip $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dusek, Ladislav $u Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dundr, Pavel $u Department of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Nemejcova, Kristyna $u Department of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jarkovsky, Jiri $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses; Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Cibula, David $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic d_cibula@yahoo.com
773    0_
$w MED00009896 $t International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society $x 1525-1438 $g Roč. 30, č. 6 (2020), s. 744-748
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32276933 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830102145 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1691129 $s 1140941
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 30 $c 6 $d 744-748 $e 20200409 $i 1525-1438 $m International journal of gynecological cancer $n Int J Gynecol Cancer $x MED00009896
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...