Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Validity of the Aktibipo Self-rating Questionnaire for the Digital Self-assessment of Mood and Relapse Detection in Patients With Bipolar Disorder: Instrument Validation Study

J. Anýž, E. Bakštein, A. Dally, M. Kolenič, J. Hlinka, T. Hartmannová, K. Urbanová, CU. Correll, D. Novák, F. Španiel

. 2021 ; 8 (8) : e26348. [pub] 20210809

Language English Country Canada

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Self-reported mood is a valuable clinical data source regarding disease state and course in patients with mood disorders. However, validated, quick, and scalable digital self-report measures that can also detect relapse are still not available for clinical care. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aim to validate the newly developed ASERT (Aktibipo Self-rating) questionnaire-a 10-item, mobile app-based, self-report mood questionnaire consisting of 4 depression, 4 mania, and 2 nonspecific symptom items, each with 5 possible answers. The validation data set is a subset of the ongoing observational longitudinal AKTIBIPO400 study for the long-term monitoring of mood and activity (via actigraphy) in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). Patients with confirmed BD are included and monitored with weekly ASERT questionnaires and monthly clinical scales (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] and Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS]). METHODS: The content validity of the ASERT questionnaire was assessed using principal component analysis, and the Cronbach α was used to assess the internal consistency of each factor. The convergent validity of the depressive or manic items of the ASERT questionnaire with the MADRS and YMRS, respectively, was assessed using a linear mixed-effects model and linear correlation analyses. In addition, we investigated the capability of the ASERT questionnaire to distinguish relapse (YMRS≥15 and MADRS≥15) from a nonrelapse (interepisode) state (YMRS<15 and MADRS<15) using a logistic mixed-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients with BD were included in this study (follow-up: mean 754 days, SD 266) and completed an average of 78.1% (SD 18.3%) of the requested ASERT assessments (completion time for the 10 ASERT questions: median 24.0 seconds) across all patients in this study. The ASERT depression items were highly associated with MADRS total scores (P<.001; bootstrap). Similarly, ASERT mania items were highly associated with YMRS total scores (P<.001; bootstrap). Furthermore, the logistic mixed-effects regression model for scale-based relapse detection showed high detection accuracy in a repeated holdout validation for both depression (accuracy=85%; sensitivity=69.9%; specificity=88.4%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.880) and mania (accuracy=87.5%; sensitivity=64.9%; specificity=89.9%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.844). CONCLUSIONS: The ASERT questionnaire is a quick and acceptable mood monitoring tool that is administered via a smartphone app. The questionnaire has a good capability to detect the worsening of clinical symptoms in a long-term monitoring scenario.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21024187
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211013134027.0
007      
ta
008      
211006s2021 xxc f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.2196/26348 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34383689
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxc
100    1_
$a Anýž, Jiří $u National Insitute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Validity of the Aktibipo Self-rating Questionnaire for the Digital Self-assessment of Mood and Relapse Detection in Patients With Bipolar Disorder: Instrument Validation Study / $c J. Anýž, E. Bakštein, A. Dally, M. Kolenič, J. Hlinka, T. Hartmannová, K. Urbanová, CU. Correll, D. Novák, F. Španiel
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Self-reported mood is a valuable clinical data source regarding disease state and course in patients with mood disorders. However, validated, quick, and scalable digital self-report measures that can also detect relapse are still not available for clinical care. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aim to validate the newly developed ASERT (Aktibipo Self-rating) questionnaire-a 10-item, mobile app-based, self-report mood questionnaire consisting of 4 depression, 4 mania, and 2 nonspecific symptom items, each with 5 possible answers. The validation data set is a subset of the ongoing observational longitudinal AKTIBIPO400 study for the long-term monitoring of mood and activity (via actigraphy) in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). Patients with confirmed BD are included and monitored with weekly ASERT questionnaires and monthly clinical scales (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] and Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS]). METHODS: The content validity of the ASERT questionnaire was assessed using principal component analysis, and the Cronbach α was used to assess the internal consistency of each factor. The convergent validity of the depressive or manic items of the ASERT questionnaire with the MADRS and YMRS, respectively, was assessed using a linear mixed-effects model and linear correlation analyses. In addition, we investigated the capability of the ASERT questionnaire to distinguish relapse (YMRS≥15 and MADRS≥15) from a nonrelapse (interepisode) state (YMRS<15 and MADRS<15) using a logistic mixed-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients with BD were included in this study (follow-up: mean 754 days, SD 266) and completed an average of 78.1% (SD 18.3%) of the requested ASERT assessments (completion time for the 10 ASERT questions: median 24.0 seconds) across all patients in this study. The ASERT depression items were highly associated with MADRS total scores (P<.001; bootstrap). Similarly, ASERT mania items were highly associated with YMRS total scores (P<.001; bootstrap). Furthermore, the logistic mixed-effects regression model for scale-based relapse detection showed high detection accuracy in a repeated holdout validation for both depression (accuracy=85%; sensitivity=69.9%; specificity=88.4%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.880) and mania (accuracy=87.5%; sensitivity=64.9%; specificity=89.9%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.844). CONCLUSIONS: The ASERT questionnaire is a quick and acceptable mood monitoring tool that is administered via a smartphone app. The questionnaire has a good capability to detect the worsening of clinical symptoms in a long-term monitoring scenario.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Bakštein, Eduard $u National Insitute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dally, Andrea $u Mindpax s.r.o, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kolenič, Marián $u National Insitute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hlinka, Jaroslav $u National Insitute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hartmannová, Tereza $u National Insitute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Mindpax s.r.o, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Urbanová, Kateřina $u National Insitute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Mindpax s.r.o, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Correll, Christoph U $u Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, United States $u Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, United States $u Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
700    1_
$a Novák, Daniel $u Department of Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Španiel, Filip $u National Insitute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00196702 $t JMIR mental health $x 2368-7959 $g Roč. 8, č. 8 (2021), s. e26348
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34383689 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20211006 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211013134024 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1708223 $s 1144684
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 8 $c 8 $d e26348 $e 20210809 $i 2368-7959 $m JMIR mental health $n JMIR Ment Health $x MED00196702
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211006

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...