-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Cord Blood Extracellular Vesicles Analyzed by Flow Cytometry with Thresholding Using 405 nm or 488 nm Laser Leads to Concurrent Results
K. Pekárková, J. Soukup, M. Kostelanská, J. Širc, Z. Straňák, K. Holada
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
NV17-31403A
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
1322119
Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Článek
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
ProQuest Central
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) from liquid biopsies are extensively analyzed by flow cytometry, a technology that is continuously evolving. Thresholding utilizing a violet 405 nm laser side scatter (VSSC) has recently been implemented. Here, we collected set of large EV (lEV) samples from cord blood, which we analyzed using a standard flow cytometer improved via a 405 nm laser side scatter. Samples were analyzed using two distinct thresholding methods-one based on VSSC, and one based on VSSC combined with fluorescence thresholding on stained phosphatidylserine. Through these thresholding methods, we compared lEVs from pre-term births and control cord blood. Double-labeled lEVs with platelet CD36+/CD41+, activated platelet CD41+/CD62P+ and endothelial CD31+/CD105+ antibodies were used. Apart from comparing the two groups together, we also correlated measured lEVs with the thresholding methods. We also correlated the results of this study with data analyzed in our previous study in which we used a conventional 488 nm laser SSC. We did not find any difference between the two cord blood groups. However, we found highly concurrent data via our correlation of the thresholding methods, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.80 to 0.96 even though the numbers of detected lEVs differed between thresholding methods. In conclusion, our approaches to thresholding provided concurrent data and it seems that improving the cytometer with the use of a VSSC increases its sensitivity, despite not being particularly critical to the validity of flow cytometric studies that compare pathological and physiological conditions in liquid biopsies.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21024326
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220509175931.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211006s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/diagnostics11081320 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34441255
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Pekárková, Kristýna $u Institute of Immunology and Microbiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Cord Blood Extracellular Vesicles Analyzed by Flow Cytometry with Thresholding Using 405 nm or 488 nm Laser Leads to Concurrent Results / $c K. Pekárková, J. Soukup, M. Kostelanská, J. Širc, Z. Straňák, K. Holada
- 520 9_
- $a Extracellular vesicles (EVs) from liquid biopsies are extensively analyzed by flow cytometry, a technology that is continuously evolving. Thresholding utilizing a violet 405 nm laser side scatter (VSSC) has recently been implemented. Here, we collected set of large EV (lEV) samples from cord blood, which we analyzed using a standard flow cytometer improved via a 405 nm laser side scatter. Samples were analyzed using two distinct thresholding methods-one based on VSSC, and one based on VSSC combined with fluorescence thresholding on stained phosphatidylserine. Through these thresholding methods, we compared lEVs from pre-term births and control cord blood. Double-labeled lEVs with platelet CD36+/CD41+, activated platelet CD41+/CD62P+ and endothelial CD31+/CD105+ antibodies were used. Apart from comparing the two groups together, we also correlated measured lEVs with the thresholding methods. We also correlated the results of this study with data analyzed in our previous study in which we used a conventional 488 nm laser SSC. We did not find any difference between the two cord blood groups. However, we found highly concurrent data via our correlation of the thresholding methods, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.80 to 0.96 even though the numbers of detected lEVs differed between thresholding methods. In conclusion, our approaches to thresholding provided concurrent data and it seems that improving the cytometer with the use of a VSSC increases its sensitivity, despite not being particularly critical to the validity of flow cytometric studies that compare pathological and physiological conditions in liquid biopsies.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Soukup, Jakub $u Institute of Immunology and Microbiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 44 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kostelanská, Marie $u Institute of Immunology and Microbiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Širc, Jan $u The Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, 147 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Straňák, Zbyněk $u The Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, 147 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Holada, Karel $u Institute of Immunology and Microbiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00195450 $t Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) $x 2075-4418 $g Roč. 11, č. 8 (2021)
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211006 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220509175929 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1708279 $s 1144823
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 11 $c 8 $e 20210722 $i 2075-4418 $m Diagnostics $n Diagnostics $x MED00195450
- GRA __
- $a NV17-31403A $p MZ0
- GRA __
- $a 1322119 $p Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211006