-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Diagnostic Value of the PeptestTM in Detecting Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
K. Zeleník, V. Hránková, A. Vrtková, L. Staníková, P. Komínek, M. Formánek
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
MH CZ - DRO - FNOs/2018
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2012
PubMed Central
od 2012
Europe PubMed Central
od 2012
ProQuest Central
od 2019-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2012-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2012-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2019-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2012
PubMed
34279479
DOI
10.3390/jcm10132996
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: The PeptestTM is a non-invasive diagnostic test for measuring the pepsin concentration in saliva, which is thought to correlate with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of the Peptest in detecting LPR based on 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring using several hypopharyngeal reflux episodes as criterion for LPR. METHODS: Patients with suspected LPR were examined with the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS), fasting Peptest, and MII-pH monitoring. We calculated the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the Peptest, RSI, and RFS based on the threshold of one and six hypopharyngeal reflux episodes. RESULTS: Altogether, the data from 46 patients were analyzed. When one hypopharyngeal reflux episode was used as a diagnostic threshold for LPR, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were, respectively, as follows: 35%, 33%, 100%, 100%, and 3%, for the Peptest; 39%, 40%, 0%, 95%, and 0%, for the RSI; and 57%, 58%, 0%, 96%, and 0%, for the RFS. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the Peptest for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were 46%, 27%, 63%, 40.0%, and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A positive Peptest is highly supportive of a pathological LPR diagnosis. However, a negative test could not exclude LPR.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21024435
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211013133931.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211006s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/jcm10132996 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34279479
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Zeleník, Karol $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Diagnostic Value of the PeptestTM in Detecting Laryngopharyngeal Reflux / $c K. Zeleník, V. Hránková, A. Vrtková, L. Staníková, P. Komínek, M. Formánek
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The PeptestTM is a non-invasive diagnostic test for measuring the pepsin concentration in saliva, which is thought to correlate with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of the Peptest in detecting LPR based on 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring using several hypopharyngeal reflux episodes as criterion for LPR. METHODS: Patients with suspected LPR were examined with the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS), fasting Peptest, and MII-pH monitoring. We calculated the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the Peptest, RSI, and RFS based on the threshold of one and six hypopharyngeal reflux episodes. RESULTS: Altogether, the data from 46 patients were analyzed. When one hypopharyngeal reflux episode was used as a diagnostic threshold for LPR, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were, respectively, as follows: 35%, 33%, 100%, 100%, and 3%, for the Peptest; 39%, 40%, 0%, 95%, and 0%, for the RSI; and 57%, 58%, 0%, 96%, and 0%, for the RFS. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the Peptest for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were 46%, 27%, 63%, 40.0%, and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A positive Peptest is highly supportive of a pathological LPR diagnosis. However, a negative test could not exclude LPR.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Hránková, Viktória $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vrtková, Adéla $u Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Staníková, Lucia $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Komínek, Pavel $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Formánek, Martin $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00195462 $t Journal of clinical medicine $x 2077-0383 $g Roč. 10, č. 13 (2021)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34279479 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211006 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211013133928 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1708318 $s 1144932
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 10 $c 13 $e 20210705 $i 2077-0383 $m Journal of clinical medicine $n J Clin Med $x MED00195462
- GRA __
- $a MH CZ - DRO - FNOs/2018 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211006