-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Influence of sports groups on the risk of stress urinary incontinence in sportswomen
M. Selecka, M. Hagovska, A. Bukova, J. Svihra
Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- inkontinence moči * MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- stresová inkontinence moči * epidemiologie etiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate sports groups on the risk of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in sportswomen and its impact on their quality of life. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. The group consisted of 249 sportswomen with a mean age of 22.18 ± 6.11 years. We used the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-UI), the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) and the Quality of Life Assessment Questionnaire Concerning Urinary Incontinence (Contilife) were used for evaluation. We divided the sports into the following six groups: 1. Functional mobilization sports (FMS); 2. Strength sports (SS); 3. Aesthetic-coordination and sensory-concentration sports (ACS); 4. Heuristic-individual and martial arts (HIS + MAS); 5. Heuristic-collective sports with a hockey stick (HCS-A); and 6. Heuristic-collective sports with a ball (HCS-B). RESULTS: The symptoms of SUI according to the ICIQ-UI SF were 1.80 ± 2.93. The estimate of the relative risk (OR) of developing SUI was most significant in the FMS group (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.04-3.68; p < 0.03). Other sports groups did not pose a significant relative risk of developing SUI and had a lower incidence of SUI. In SS was OR = 0.77, in EKS, OR = 0.69, in (HIS + BS), OR = 1.26, in (HKS-A) was OR = 0.63, in (HKS-B) was OR = 1.02. There were no significant differences between the groups in the overall score of the Contilife, which assesses quality of life. CONCLUSION: The Functional mobilization sports group had a 1.96 times higher risk of SUI compared to that in other sports groups.
Department of Health Promotion Faculty of Sports Studies Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Physical Education and Sport Institution PJ Safarik University Kosice Slovak Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21025014
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026134213.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 ie f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.047 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34399106
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ie
- 100 1_
- $a Selecka, Michaela $u Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Influence of sports groups on the risk of stress urinary incontinence in sportswomen / $c M. Selecka, M. Hagovska, A. Bukova, J. Svihra
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: To evaluate sports groups on the risk of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in sportswomen and its impact on their quality of life. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. The group consisted of 249 sportswomen with a mean age of 22.18 ± 6.11 years. We used the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-UI), the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) and the Quality of Life Assessment Questionnaire Concerning Urinary Incontinence (Contilife) were used for evaluation. We divided the sports into the following six groups: 1. Functional mobilization sports (FMS); 2. Strength sports (SS); 3. Aesthetic-coordination and sensory-concentration sports (ACS); 4. Heuristic-individual and martial arts (HIS + MAS); 5. Heuristic-collective sports with a hockey stick (HCS-A); and 6. Heuristic-collective sports with a ball (HCS-B). RESULTS: The symptoms of SUI according to the ICIQ-UI SF were 1.80 ± 2.93. The estimate of the relative risk (OR) of developing SUI was most significant in the FMS group (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.04-3.68; p < 0.03). Other sports groups did not pose a significant relative risk of developing SUI and had a lower incidence of SUI. In SS was OR = 0.77, in EKS, OR = 0.69, in (HIS + BS), OR = 1.26, in (HKS-A) was OR = 0.63, in (HKS-B) was OR = 1.02. There were no significant differences between the groups in the overall score of the Contilife, which assesses quality of life. CONCLUSION: The Functional mobilization sports group had a 1.96 times higher risk of SUI compared to that in other sports groups.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a průřezové studie $7 D003430
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 650 12
- $a inkontinence moči $7 D014549
- 650 12
- $a stresová inkontinence moči $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D014550
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Hagovska, Magdalena $u Department of Physiatry, Balneology, and Medical Rehabilitation, Institution - Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Kosice, Slovak Republic. Electronic address: magdalena.hagovska@upjs.sk
- 700 1_
- $a Bukova, Alena $u Institute of Physical Education and Sport, Institution - PJ Safarik University, Kosice, Slovak Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Svihra, Jan $u Department of Urology, Institution - Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Martin, Comenius University Bratislava, University Hospital Martin, Slovak Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001632 $t European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology $x 1872-7654 $g Roč. 264, č. - (2021), s. 374-379
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34399106 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026134219 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1714179 $s 1145521
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 264 $c - $d 374-379 $e 20210729 $i 1872-7654 $m European journal of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology $n Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol $x MED00001632
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013