Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Could the new coronavirus have infected humans prior November 2019

A. Tichopád, L. Pecen, V. Sedlák

. 2021 ; 16 (8) : e0248255. [pub] 20210819

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21025104

The pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus is believed to originate in China from where it spread to other parts of the world. The first cluster of diseased individuals was reported in China as early as in December 2019. It has also been well established that the virus stroke Italy later in January or in February 2020, hence distinctly after the outbreak in China. The work by Apolone et al. published in the Italian Medical Journal in November 2020 and retracted upon expression of concern on 22 March 2021, however propose that the virus could have stroke people already in September 2019, possibly following even earlier outbreak in China. By fitting an early part of the epidemic curve with the exponential and extrapolating it backwards, we could estimate the day-zero of the epidemic and calculated its confidence intervals in Italy and China. We also calculated how probable it is that Italy encountered the virus prior 1 January 2020. We determined an early portion of the epidemic curve representing unhindered exponential growth which fit the exponential model with high determination >0.97 in both countries. We conservatively suggest that the day-zero in China and Italy was 8 December 2019 (95% CI: 3 Dec., 20 Dec.) and 22 January 2020 (95% CI: 16 Jan., 29 Jan.), respectively. Given the uncertainty of the very early data in China and adjusting hence our model to fit the exponentially behaved data only, we can even admit that the pandemic originated through November 2019 (95% CI: 31 Oct., 22 Dec.). With high confidence (p <0.01) China encountered the virus prior Italy. We generally view any pre-pandemic presence of the virus in humans before November 2019 as very unlikely. The later established dynamics of the epidemics data suggests that the country of the origin was China.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21025104
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026134124.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0248255 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34411115
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Tichopád, Aleš $u Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Immunochemistry Diagnostics, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen of Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Could the new coronavirus have infected humans prior November 2019 / $c A. Tichopád, L. Pecen, V. Sedlák
520    9_
$a The pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus is believed to originate in China from where it spread to other parts of the world. The first cluster of diseased individuals was reported in China as early as in December 2019. It has also been well established that the virus stroke Italy later in January or in February 2020, hence distinctly after the outbreak in China. The work by Apolone et al. published in the Italian Medical Journal in November 2020 and retracted upon expression of concern on 22 March 2021, however propose that the virus could have stroke people already in September 2019, possibly following even earlier outbreak in China. By fitting an early part of the epidemic curve with the exponential and extrapolating it backwards, we could estimate the day-zero of the epidemic and calculated its confidence intervals in Italy and China. We also calculated how probable it is that Italy encountered the virus prior 1 January 2020. We determined an early portion of the epidemic curve representing unhindered exponential growth which fit the exponential model with high determination >0.97 in both countries. We conservatively suggest that the day-zero in China and Italy was 8 December 2019 (95% CI: 3 Dec., 20 Dec.) and 22 January 2020 (95% CI: 16 Jan., 29 Jan.), respectively. Given the uncertainty of the very early data in China and adjusting hence our model to fit the exponentially behaved data only, we can even admit that the pandemic originated through November 2019 (95% CI: 31 Oct., 22 Dec.). With high confidence (p <0.01) China encountered the virus prior Italy. We generally view any pre-pandemic presence of the virus in humans before November 2019 as very unlikely. The later established dynamics of the epidemics data suggests that the country of the origin was China.
650    12
$a COVID-19 $x epidemiologie $x přenos $7 D000086382
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a biologické modely $7 D008954
650    12
$a pandemie $7 D058873
650    12
$a SARS-CoV-2 $7 D000086402
651    _2
$a Čína $x epidemiologie $7 D002681
651    _2
$a Itálie $x epidemiologie $7 D007558
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Pecen, Ladislav $u Department of Immunochemistry Diagnostics, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen of Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Institute of Computer Science of the Czech Academy of Science, The Czech Academy of Science, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sedlák, Vratislav $u Department of Pneumology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové of Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 16, č. 8 (2021), s. e0248255
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34411115 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026134130 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1714242 $s 1145611
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 16 $c 8 $d e0248255 $e 20210819 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Find record

Citation metrics

Logged in users only

Archiving options