-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The effect of column history in supercritical fluid chromatography: Practical implications
K. Plachká, J. Střítecký, F. Svec, L. Nováková
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- formiáty chemie MeSH
- hydroxid amonný chemie MeSH
- methanol chemie MeSH
- oxid křemičitý chemie MeSH
- superkritická fluidní chromatografie metody MeSH
- voda chemie MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Long-term stability of retention times of a wide range of analytes has been evaluated using eight different stationary phases. These were from a single manufacturer to minimize the differences in silanol activity caused by the manufacturing process. The tested stationary phases included bridge ethylene hybrid, 2-ethylpyridine bridge ethylene hybrid with direct modification of silica particles, bidentate crosslinked charged surface hybrid fluorophenyl, bidentate crosslinked high strength silica C18, and propanediol linked phases including diol (pure propanediol linker), and three phases based on diol further modified with 2-picolylamine, diethylamine, and 1-aminoanthracene group. Retention times were monitored at the first injection, after three, nine, twelve months, and after the column regeneration via washing with pure water. The analyses were carried out using three different mobile phases, including methanol, methanol with 10 mmol/L ammonium formate, and methanol with 0.1% ammonium hydroxide. No overall decreasing or increasing trends were observed after evaluating individual contributing parameters such as analyte, stationary phase, and organic modifier. Our results suggest that the silyl-ether formation is not the only factor contributing to changes in the stationary phase pore surface. Indeed, the adsorption of mobile phase additives is probably another significant factor. That was also confirmed by the regeneration procedure using water, which is likely to reverse the silyl-ether formation to achieve the original retention. However, the retention times returned to the original values for all analytes only on three columns. Retention times on other columns remained shifted within ± 15 % RSD depending on the analyte properties and the nature of organic modifier. The retention time variations observed for each analyte group, i.e., acids, bases, and neutrals, were interpreted for each stationary phase. We concluded that the sterically protected surfaces exhibited significantly smaller changes in the retention times. Although the regeneration procedure effect depended on the column type, the results suggested beneficial effect of water. However, as the adsorption of additives on the column surface is an additional factor leading to retention time variations, the recommendation of using only one additive and/or organic modifier in each column will clearly improve the long-term repeatability of the retention times.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21025116
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026134116.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462272 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34107402
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Plachká, Kateřina $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 245 14
- $a The effect of column history in supercritical fluid chromatography: Practical implications / $c K. Plachká, J. Střítecký, F. Svec, L. Nováková
- 520 9_
- $a Long-term stability of retention times of a wide range of analytes has been evaluated using eight different stationary phases. These were from a single manufacturer to minimize the differences in silanol activity caused by the manufacturing process. The tested stationary phases included bridge ethylene hybrid, 2-ethylpyridine bridge ethylene hybrid with direct modification of silica particles, bidentate crosslinked charged surface hybrid fluorophenyl, bidentate crosslinked high strength silica C18, and propanediol linked phases including diol (pure propanediol linker), and three phases based on diol further modified with 2-picolylamine, diethylamine, and 1-aminoanthracene group. Retention times were monitored at the first injection, after three, nine, twelve months, and after the column regeneration via washing with pure water. The analyses were carried out using three different mobile phases, including methanol, methanol with 10 mmol/L ammonium formate, and methanol with 0.1% ammonium hydroxide. No overall decreasing or increasing trends were observed after evaluating individual contributing parameters such as analyte, stationary phase, and organic modifier. Our results suggest that the silyl-ether formation is not the only factor contributing to changes in the stationary phase pore surface. Indeed, the adsorption of mobile phase additives is probably another significant factor. That was also confirmed by the regeneration procedure using water, which is likely to reverse the silyl-ether formation to achieve the original retention. However, the retention times returned to the original values for all analytes only on three columns. Retention times on other columns remained shifted within ± 15 % RSD depending on the analyte properties and the nature of organic modifier. The retention time variations observed for each analyte group, i.e., acids, bases, and neutrals, were interpreted for each stationary phase. We concluded that the sterically protected surfaces exhibited significantly smaller changes in the retention times. Although the regeneration procedure effect depended on the column type, the results suggested beneficial effect of water. However, as the adsorption of additives on the column surface is an additional factor leading to retention time variations, the recommendation of using only one additive and/or organic modifier in each column will clearly improve the long-term repeatability of the retention times.
- 650 _2
- $a hydroxid amonný $x chemie $7 D064753
- 650 _2
- $a superkritická fluidní chromatografie $x metody $7 D025924
- 650 _2
- $a formiáty $x chemie $7 D005561
- 650 _2
- $a methanol $x chemie $7 D000432
- 650 _2
- $a oxid křemičitý $x chemie $7 D012822
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a voda $x chemie $7 D014867
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Střítecký, Jakub $u Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Šimkova 870, Hradec Králové 500 03, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Svec, Frantisek $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Nováková, Lucie $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. Electronic address: nol@email.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004962 $t Journal of chromatography. A $x 1873-3778 $g Roč. 1651, č. - (2021), s. 462272
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34107402 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026134122 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1714251 $s 1145623
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 1651 $c - $d 462272 $e 20210524 $i 1873-3778 $m Journal of chromatography. A, Including electrophoresis and other separation methods $n J Chromatogr A $x MED00004962
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013