• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The effect of column history in supercritical fluid chromatography: Practical implications

K. Plachká, J. Střítecký, F. Svec, L. Nováková

. 2021 ; 1651 (-) : 462272. [pub] 20210524

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21025116

Long-term stability of retention times of a wide range of analytes has been evaluated using eight different stationary phases. These were from a single manufacturer to minimize the differences in silanol activity caused by the manufacturing process. The tested stationary phases included bridge ethylene hybrid, 2-ethylpyridine bridge ethylene hybrid with direct modification of silica particles, bidentate crosslinked charged surface hybrid fluorophenyl, bidentate crosslinked high strength silica C18, and propanediol linked phases including diol (pure propanediol linker), and three phases based on diol further modified with 2-picolylamine, diethylamine, and 1-aminoanthracene group. Retention times were monitored at the first injection, after three, nine, twelve months, and after the column regeneration via washing with pure water. The analyses were carried out using three different mobile phases, including methanol, methanol with 10 mmol/L ammonium formate, and methanol with 0.1% ammonium hydroxide. No overall decreasing or increasing trends were observed after evaluating individual contributing parameters such as analyte, stationary phase, and organic modifier. Our results suggest that the silyl-ether formation is not the only factor contributing to changes in the stationary phase pore surface. Indeed, the adsorption of mobile phase additives is probably another significant factor. That was also confirmed by the regeneration procedure using water, which is likely to reverse the silyl-ether formation to achieve the original retention. However, the retention times returned to the original values for all analytes only on three columns. Retention times on other columns remained shifted within ± 15 % RSD depending on the analyte properties and the nature of organic modifier. The retention time variations observed for each analyte group, i.e., acids, bases, and neutrals, were interpreted for each stationary phase. We concluded that the sterically protected surfaces exhibited significantly smaller changes in the retention times. Although the regeneration procedure effect depended on the column type, the results suggested beneficial effect of water. However, as the adsorption of additives on the column surface is an additional factor leading to retention time variations, the recommendation of using only one additive and/or organic modifier in each column will clearly improve the long-term repeatability of the retention times.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21025116
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026134116.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462272 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34107402
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Plachká, Kateřina $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
245    14
$a The effect of column history in supercritical fluid chromatography: Practical implications / $c K. Plachká, J. Střítecký, F. Svec, L. Nováková
520    9_
$a Long-term stability of retention times of a wide range of analytes has been evaluated using eight different stationary phases. These were from a single manufacturer to minimize the differences in silanol activity caused by the manufacturing process. The tested stationary phases included bridge ethylene hybrid, 2-ethylpyridine bridge ethylene hybrid with direct modification of silica particles, bidentate crosslinked charged surface hybrid fluorophenyl, bidentate crosslinked high strength silica C18, and propanediol linked phases including diol (pure propanediol linker), and three phases based on diol further modified with 2-picolylamine, diethylamine, and 1-aminoanthracene group. Retention times were monitored at the first injection, after three, nine, twelve months, and after the column regeneration via washing with pure water. The analyses were carried out using three different mobile phases, including methanol, methanol with 10 mmol/L ammonium formate, and methanol with 0.1% ammonium hydroxide. No overall decreasing or increasing trends were observed after evaluating individual contributing parameters such as analyte, stationary phase, and organic modifier. Our results suggest that the silyl-ether formation is not the only factor contributing to changes in the stationary phase pore surface. Indeed, the adsorption of mobile phase additives is probably another significant factor. That was also confirmed by the regeneration procedure using water, which is likely to reverse the silyl-ether formation to achieve the original retention. However, the retention times returned to the original values for all analytes only on three columns. Retention times on other columns remained shifted within ± 15 % RSD depending on the analyte properties and the nature of organic modifier. The retention time variations observed for each analyte group, i.e., acids, bases, and neutrals, were interpreted for each stationary phase. We concluded that the sterically protected surfaces exhibited significantly smaller changes in the retention times. Although the regeneration procedure effect depended on the column type, the results suggested beneficial effect of water. However, as the adsorption of additives on the column surface is an additional factor leading to retention time variations, the recommendation of using only one additive and/or organic modifier in each column will clearly improve the long-term repeatability of the retention times.
650    _2
$a hydroxid amonný $x chemie $7 D064753
650    _2
$a superkritická fluidní chromatografie $x metody $7 D025924
650    _2
$a formiáty $x chemie $7 D005561
650    _2
$a methanol $x chemie $7 D000432
650    _2
$a oxid křemičitý $x chemie $7 D012822
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a voda $x chemie $7 D014867
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Střítecký, Jakub $u Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Šimkova 870, Hradec Králové 500 03, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Svec, Frantisek $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Nováková, Lucie $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. Electronic address: nol@email.cz
773    0_
$w MED00004962 $t Journal of chromatography. A $x 1873-3778 $g Roč. 1651, č. - (2021), s. 462272
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34107402 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026134122 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1714251 $s 1145623
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 1651 $c - $d 462272 $e 20210524 $i 1873-3778 $m Journal of chromatography. A, Including electrophoresis and other separation methods $n J Chromatogr A $x MED00004962
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...