Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Brain activity changes following neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" physiotherapy in multiple sclerosis: a parallel group randomized comparison of two approaches

M. Prochazkova, J. Tintera, S. Spanhelova, T. Prokopiusova, J. Rydlo, M. Pavlikova, A. Prochazka, K. Rasova

. 2021 ; 57 (3) : 356-365. [pub] 20200916

Language English Country Italy

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Imaging methods bring new possibilities for describing the brain plasticity processes that underly the improvement of clinical function after physiotherapy in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Although these processes have been described mainly in connection with task-oriented physiotherapy and aerobic training, they have not been properly verified in neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" (facilitation) approaches. AIM: The study determined whether facilitation physiotherapy could enhance brain plasticity, compared two facilitation methods and looked for any relation to clinical improvement in pwMS. DESIGN: The study was designed as parallel group randomized comparison of two kinds of physiotherapeutic interventions referred to healthy controls. SETTING: Thirty-eight outpatients were involved in the study. POPULATION: The study had 80 participants (38 pwMS and 42 healthy controls). METHODS: PwMS were divided into two groups and underwent a two-month physiotherapy program: Vojta reflex locomotion (VRL) or Motor program activating therapy (MPAT), (1 hour, twice a week). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and clinical examination was performed before and after therapy. Healthy controls underwent one fMRI examination. RESULTS: Physiotherapy in pwMS leads to extension of brain activity in specific brain areas (cerebellum, supplementary motor areas and premotor areas) in connection with the improvement of the clinical status of individual patients after therapy (P=0.05). Greater changes (P=0.001) were registered after MPAT than after VRL. The extension of activation was a shift to the examined activation of healthy controls, whose activation was higher in the cerebellum and secondary visual area (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" physiotherapy may enhance brain activity and could involve processes connected with the processing of motion activation. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The study showed that facilitation approach can modulate brain activity. This could be useful for developing of effective physiotherapeutic treatment in MS.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21025657
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026133618.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 it f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06336-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32935954
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a it
100    1_
$a Prochazkova, Marie $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Brain activity changes following neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" physiotherapy in multiple sclerosis: a parallel group randomized comparison of two approaches / $c M. Prochazkova, J. Tintera, S. Spanhelova, T. Prokopiusova, J. Rydlo, M. Pavlikova, A. Prochazka, K. Rasova
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Imaging methods bring new possibilities for describing the brain plasticity processes that underly the improvement of clinical function after physiotherapy in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Although these processes have been described mainly in connection with task-oriented physiotherapy and aerobic training, they have not been properly verified in neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" (facilitation) approaches. AIM: The study determined whether facilitation physiotherapy could enhance brain plasticity, compared two facilitation methods and looked for any relation to clinical improvement in pwMS. DESIGN: The study was designed as parallel group randomized comparison of two kinds of physiotherapeutic interventions referred to healthy controls. SETTING: Thirty-eight outpatients were involved in the study. POPULATION: The study had 80 participants (38 pwMS and 42 healthy controls). METHODS: PwMS were divided into two groups and underwent a two-month physiotherapy program: Vojta reflex locomotion (VRL) or Motor program activating therapy (MPAT), (1 hour, twice a week). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and clinical examination was performed before and after therapy. Healthy controls underwent one fMRI examination. RESULTS: Physiotherapy in pwMS leads to extension of brain activity in specific brain areas (cerebellum, supplementary motor areas and premotor areas) in connection with the improvement of the clinical status of individual patients after therapy (P=0.05). Greater changes (P=0.001) were registered after MPAT than after VRL. The extension of activation was a shift to the examined activation of healthy controls, whose activation was higher in the cerebellum and secondary visual area (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" physiotherapy may enhance brain activity and could involve processes connected with the processing of motion activation. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The study showed that facilitation approach can modulate brain activity. This could be useful for developing of effective physiotherapeutic treatment in MS.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a mozek $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D001921
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a roztroušená skleróza $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $7 D009103
650    12
$a techniky fyzikální terapie $7 D026741
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Tintera, Jaroslav $u MR Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Spanhelova, Sarka $u Department of Rehabilitation, Motol Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Prokopiusova, Terezie $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Rydlo, Jan $u MR Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pavlikova, Marketa $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Prochazka, Antonin $u Institute of Biophysics and Informatics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Rasova, Kamila $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic - kamila.rasova@gmail.com
773    0_
$w MED00174347 $t European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine $x 1973-9095 $g Roč. 57, č. 3 (2021), s. 356-365
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32935954 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026133624 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1714625 $s 1146164
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 57 $c 3 $d 356-365 $e 20200916 $i 1973-9095 $m European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine $n Eur. j. phys. rehabil. med. $x MED00174347
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...