-
Something wrong with this record ?
Brain activity changes following neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" physiotherapy in multiple sclerosis: a parallel group randomized comparison of two approaches
M. Prochazkova, J. Tintera, S. Spanhelova, T. Prokopiusova, J. Rydlo, M. Pavlikova, A. Prochazka, K. Rasova
Language English Country Italy
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
- Brain diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Multiple Sclerosis diagnostic imaging therapy MeSH
- Physical Therapy Modalities * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: Imaging methods bring new possibilities for describing the brain plasticity processes that underly the improvement of clinical function after physiotherapy in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Although these processes have been described mainly in connection with task-oriented physiotherapy and aerobic training, they have not been properly verified in neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" (facilitation) approaches. AIM: The study determined whether facilitation physiotherapy could enhance brain plasticity, compared two facilitation methods and looked for any relation to clinical improvement in pwMS. DESIGN: The study was designed as parallel group randomized comparison of two kinds of physiotherapeutic interventions referred to healthy controls. SETTING: Thirty-eight outpatients were involved in the study. POPULATION: The study had 80 participants (38 pwMS and 42 healthy controls). METHODS: PwMS were divided into two groups and underwent a two-month physiotherapy program: Vojta reflex locomotion (VRL) or Motor program activating therapy (MPAT), (1 hour, twice a week). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and clinical examination was performed before and after therapy. Healthy controls underwent one fMRI examination. RESULTS: Physiotherapy in pwMS leads to extension of brain activity in specific brain areas (cerebellum, supplementary motor areas and premotor areas) in connection with the improvement of the clinical status of individual patients after therapy (P=0.05). Greater changes (P=0.001) were registered after MPAT than after VRL. The extension of activation was a shift to the examined activation of healthy controls, whose activation was higher in the cerebellum and secondary visual area (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" physiotherapy may enhance brain activity and could involve processes connected with the processing of motion activation. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The study showed that facilitation approach can modulate brain activity. This could be useful for developing of effective physiotherapeutic treatment in MS.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21025657
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026133618.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 it f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06336-4 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32935954
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a it
- 100 1_
- $a Prochazkova, Marie $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Brain activity changes following neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" physiotherapy in multiple sclerosis: a parallel group randomized comparison of two approaches / $c M. Prochazkova, J. Tintera, S. Spanhelova, T. Prokopiusova, J. Rydlo, M. Pavlikova, A. Prochazka, K. Rasova
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Imaging methods bring new possibilities for describing the brain plasticity processes that underly the improvement of clinical function after physiotherapy in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Although these processes have been described mainly in connection with task-oriented physiotherapy and aerobic training, they have not been properly verified in neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" (facilitation) approaches. AIM: The study determined whether facilitation physiotherapy could enhance brain plasticity, compared two facilitation methods and looked for any relation to clinical improvement in pwMS. DESIGN: The study was designed as parallel group randomized comparison of two kinds of physiotherapeutic interventions referred to healthy controls. SETTING: Thirty-eight outpatients were involved in the study. POPULATION: The study had 80 participants (38 pwMS and 42 healthy controls). METHODS: PwMS were divided into two groups and underwent a two-month physiotherapy program: Vojta reflex locomotion (VRL) or Motor program activating therapy (MPAT), (1 hour, twice a week). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and clinical examination was performed before and after therapy. Healthy controls underwent one fMRI examination. RESULTS: Physiotherapy in pwMS leads to extension of brain activity in specific brain areas (cerebellum, supplementary motor areas and premotor areas) in connection with the improvement of the clinical status of individual patients after therapy (P=0.05). Greater changes (P=0.001) were registered after MPAT than after VRL. The extension of activation was a shift to the examined activation of healthy controls, whose activation was higher in the cerebellum and secondary visual area (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" physiotherapy may enhance brain activity and could involve processes connected with the processing of motion activation. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The study showed that facilitation approach can modulate brain activity. This could be useful for developing of effective physiotherapeutic treatment in MS.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a mozek $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D001921
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a roztroušená skleróza $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $7 D009103
- 650 12
- $a techniky fyzikální terapie $7 D026741
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Tintera, Jaroslav $u MR Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Spanhelova, Sarka $u Department of Rehabilitation, Motol Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Prokopiusova, Terezie $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rydlo, Jan $u MR Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pavlikova, Marketa $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Prochazka, Antonin $u Institute of Biophysics and Informatics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rasova, Kamila $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic - kamila.rasova@gmail.com
- 773 0_
- $w MED00174347 $t European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine $x 1973-9095 $g Roč. 57, č. 3 (2021), s. 356-365
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32935954 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026133624 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1714625 $s 1146164
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 57 $c 3 $d 356-365 $e 20200916 $i 1973-9095 $m European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine $n Eur. j. phys. rehabil. med. $x MED00174347
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013