-
Something wrong with this record ?
Association of De Ritis ratio with oncological outcomes in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)
E. Laukhtina, H. Mostafaei, D. D'Andrea, B. Pradere, F. Quhal, K. Mori, N. Miura, VM. Schuettfort, R. Sari Motlagh, A. Aydh, M. Abufaraj, PI. Karakiewicz, D. Enikeev, S. Kimura, SF. Shariat
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-02-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2000-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-02-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Alanine Transaminase blood MeSH
- Aspartate Aminotransferases blood MeSH
- Progression-Free Survival MeSH
- Neoplasm Invasiveness MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local epidemiology MeSH
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms blood pathology surgery MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE: The De Ritis ratio (aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, DRR) has been linked to oncological outcomes in several cancers. We aimed to assess the association of DRR with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1117 patients diagnosed with NMIBC originating from an established multicenter database. To define the optimal pretreatment DRR cut-off value, we determined a value of 1.2 as having a maximum Youden index value. The overall population was therefore divided into two De Ritis ratio groups using this cut-off (lower, < 1.2 vs. higher, ≥ 1.2). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the association of DRR with RFS and PFS. The discrimination of the model was evaluated with the Harrel's concordance index (C-index). RESULTS: Overall, 405 (36%) patients had a DRR ≥ 1.2. On univariable Cox regression analysis, DRR was significantly associated with RFS (HR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.47, p = 0.03), but not with PFS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.65-1.44, p = 0.9). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, which adjusted for the effect of established clinicopathologic features, DRR ≥ 1.2 remained significantly associated with worse RFS (HR:1.21, 95% CI 1.00-1.46, p = 0.04). The addition of DRR only minimally improved the discrimination of a base model that included established clinicopathologic features (C-index = 0.683 vs. C-index = 0.681). On DCA the inclusion of DRR did not improve the net-benefit of the prognostic model. CONCLUSION: Despite the statistically significant association of the DRR with RFS in patients with NMIBC, it does not seem to add any prognostic or clinical benefit beyond that of currently available clinical factors.
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit University of Montreal Health Centre Montreal Canada
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine Ehime Japan
Department of Urology King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam Saudi Arabia
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology University Hospital of Tours Tours France
Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
European Association of Urology Research Foundation Arnhem The Netherlands
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
King Faisal Medical City Abha Saudi Arabia
Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran
The National Center for Diabetes Endocrinology and Genetics The University of Jordan Amman Jordan
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21025705
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026133600.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00345-020-03384-9 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32808107
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Laukhtina, Ekaterina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- 245 10
- $a Association of De Ritis ratio with oncological outcomes in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) / $c E. Laukhtina, H. Mostafaei, D. D'Andrea, B. Pradere, F. Quhal, K. Mori, N. Miura, VM. Schuettfort, R. Sari Motlagh, A. Aydh, M. Abufaraj, PI. Karakiewicz, D. Enikeev, S. Kimura, SF. Shariat
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: The De Ritis ratio (aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, DRR) has been linked to oncological outcomes in several cancers. We aimed to assess the association of DRR with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1117 patients diagnosed with NMIBC originating from an established multicenter database. To define the optimal pretreatment DRR cut-off value, we determined a value of 1.2 as having a maximum Youden index value. The overall population was therefore divided into two De Ritis ratio groups using this cut-off (lower, < 1.2 vs. higher, ≥ 1.2). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the association of DRR with RFS and PFS. The discrimination of the model was evaluated with the Harrel's concordance index (C-index). RESULTS: Overall, 405 (36%) patients had a DRR ≥ 1.2. On univariable Cox regression analysis, DRR was significantly associated with RFS (HR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.47, p = 0.03), but not with PFS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.65-1.44, p = 0.9). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, which adjusted for the effect of established clinicopathologic features, DRR ≥ 1.2 remained significantly associated with worse RFS (HR:1.21, 95% CI 1.00-1.46, p = 0.04). The addition of DRR only minimally improved the discrimination of a base model that included established clinicopathologic features (C-index = 0.683 vs. C-index = 0.681). On DCA the inclusion of DRR did not improve the net-benefit of the prognostic model. CONCLUSION: Despite the statistically significant association of the DRR with RFS in patients with NMIBC, it does not seem to add any prognostic or clinical benefit beyond that of currently available clinical factors.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a alanintransaminasa $x krev $7 D000410
- 650 _2
- $a aspartátaminotransferasy $x krev $7 D001219
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a invazivní růst nádoru $7 D009361
- 650 _2
- $a lokální recidiva nádoru $x epidemiologie $7 D009364
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a doba přežití bez progrese choroby $7 D000077982
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a nádory močového měchýře $x krev $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D001749
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Mostafaei, Hadi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- 700 1_
- $a D'Andrea, David $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Pradere, Benjamin $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
- 700 1_
- $a Quhal, Fahad $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
- 700 1_
- $a Mori, Keiichiro $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Miura, Noriyoshi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Schuettfort, Victor M $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Sari Motlagh, Reza $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Aydh, Abdulmajeed $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
- 700 1_
- $a Abufaraj, Mohammad $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria $u Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan $u The National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- 700 1_
- $a Karakiewicz, Pierre I $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Enikeev, Dmitry $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- 700 1_
- $a Kimura, Shoji $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004739 $t World journal of urology $x 1433-8726 $g Roč. 39, č. 6 (2021), s. 1961-1968
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32808107 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026133606 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1714653 $s 1146212
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 39 $c 6 $d 1961-1968 $e 20200817 $i 1433-8726 $m World journal of urology $n World J Urol $x MED00004739
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013