-
Something wrong with this record ?
Pulsed Field Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II
VY. Reddy, SR. Dukkipati, P. Neuzil, A. Anic, J. Petru, M. Funasako, H. Cochet, K. Minami, T. Breskovic, I. Sikiric, L. Sediva, M. Chovanec, J. Koruth, P. Jais
Language English Country United States
Document type Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Atrial Fibrillation * surgery MeSH
- Catheter Ablation * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Recurrence MeSH
- Feasibility Studies MeSH
- Pulmonary Veins * surgery MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using pulsed field ablation (PFA) translates to freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence without an increase in adverse events. BACKGROUND: PFA is a nonthermal ablative modality that, in preclinical studies, is able to preferentially ablate myocardial tissue with minimal effect on surrounding tissues. Herein, we present 1-year clinical outcomes of PFA. METHODS: In 3 multicenter studies (IMPULSE [A Safety and Feasibility Study of the IOWA Approach Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation], PEFCAT [A Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation], and PEFCAT II [Expanded Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Multi Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation]), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients underwent PVI using a basket or flower PFA catheter. Invasive remapping was performed at ∼2 to 3 months, and reconnected PVs were reisolated with PFA or radiofrequency ablation. After a 90-day blanking period, arrhythmia recurrence was assessed over 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: In 121 patients, acute PVI was achieved in 100% of PVs with PFA alone. PV remapping, performed in 110 patients at 93.0 ± 30.1 days, demonstrated durable PVI in 84.8% of PVs (64.5% of patients), and 96.0% of PVs (84.1% of patients) treated with the optimized biphasic energy PFA waveform. Primary adverse events occurred in 2.5% of patients (2 pericardial effusions or tamponade, 1 hematoma); in addition, there was 1 transient ischemic attack. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from any atrial arrhythmia for the entire cohort and for the optimized biphasic energy PFA waveform cohort were 78.5 ± 3.8% and 84.5 ± 5.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PVI with a "single-shot" PFA catheter results in excellent PVI durability and acceptable safety with a low 1-year rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. These data mitigate concern that the nonthermal ablative mechanism of PFA might mask undiscovered compromises to clinical success. (IMPULSE: A Safety and Feasibility Study of the IOWA Approach Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation, NCT03700385; A Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, NCT03714178; PEFCAT II Expanded Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Multi Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation [PEFCAT II], NCT04170608).
Department of Cardiology Homolka Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Cardiology University Clinical Hospital Split Split Croatia
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21025806
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026133500.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.014 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33933412
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Reddy, Vivek Y $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: vivek.reddy@mountsinai.org
- 245 10
- $a Pulsed Field Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II / $c VY. Reddy, SR. Dukkipati, P. Neuzil, A. Anic, J. Petru, M. Funasako, H. Cochet, K. Minami, T. Breskovic, I. Sikiric, L. Sediva, M. Chovanec, J. Koruth, P. Jais
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using pulsed field ablation (PFA) translates to freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence without an increase in adverse events. BACKGROUND: PFA is a nonthermal ablative modality that, in preclinical studies, is able to preferentially ablate myocardial tissue with minimal effect on surrounding tissues. Herein, we present 1-year clinical outcomes of PFA. METHODS: In 3 multicenter studies (IMPULSE [A Safety and Feasibility Study of the IOWA Approach Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation], PEFCAT [A Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation], and PEFCAT II [Expanded Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Multi Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation]), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients underwent PVI using a basket or flower PFA catheter. Invasive remapping was performed at ∼2 to 3 months, and reconnected PVs were reisolated with PFA or radiofrequency ablation. After a 90-day blanking period, arrhythmia recurrence was assessed over 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: In 121 patients, acute PVI was achieved in 100% of PVs with PFA alone. PV remapping, performed in 110 patients at 93.0 ± 30.1 days, demonstrated durable PVI in 84.8% of PVs (64.5% of patients), and 96.0% of PVs (84.1% of patients) treated with the optimized biphasic energy PFA waveform. Primary adverse events occurred in 2.5% of patients (2 pericardial effusions or tamponade, 1 hematoma); in addition, there was 1 transient ischemic attack. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from any atrial arrhythmia for the entire cohort and for the optimized biphasic energy PFA waveform cohort were 78.5 ± 3.8% and 84.5 ± 5.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PVI with a "single-shot" PFA catheter results in excellent PVI durability and acceptable safety with a low 1-year rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. These data mitigate concern that the nonthermal ablative mechanism of PFA might mask undiscovered compromises to clinical success. (IMPULSE: A Safety and Feasibility Study of the IOWA Approach Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation, NCT03700385; A Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, NCT03714178; PEFCAT II Expanded Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Multi Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation [PEFCAT II], NCT04170608).
- 650 12
- $a fibrilace síní $x chirurgie $7 D001281
- 650 12
- $a katetrizační ablace $7 D017115
- 650 _2
- $a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a venae pulmonales $x chirurgie $7 D011667
- 650 _2
- $a recidiva $7 D012008
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Dukkipati, Srinivas R $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Neuzil, Petr $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Anic, Ante $u Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital Split, Split, Croatia
- 700 1_
- $a Petru, Jan $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Funasako, Moritoshi $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Cochet, Hubert $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Minami, Kentaro $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Breskovic, Toni $u Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital Split, Split, Croatia
- 700 1_
- $a Sikiric, Ivan $u Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital Split, Split, Croatia
- 700 1_
- $a Sediva, Lucie $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Chovanec, Milan $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Koruth, Jacob $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Jais, Pierre $u IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
- 773 0_
- $w MED00193518 $t JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $x 2405-5018 $g Roč. 7, č. 5 (2021), s. 614-627
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33933412 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026133506 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1714727 $s 1146313
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 7 $c 5 $d 614-627 $e 20210428 $i 2405-5018 $m JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $n JACC Clin Electrophysiol $x MED00193518
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013