• Something wrong with this record ?

Pulsed Field Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II

VY. Reddy, SR. Dukkipati, P. Neuzil, A. Anic, J. Petru, M. Funasako, H. Cochet, K. Minami, T. Breskovic, I. Sikiric, L. Sediva, M. Chovanec, J. Koruth, P. Jais

. 2021 ; 7 (5) : 614-627. [pub] 20210428

Language English Country United States

Document type Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using pulsed field ablation (PFA) translates to freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence without an increase in adverse events. BACKGROUND: PFA is a nonthermal ablative modality that, in preclinical studies, is able to preferentially ablate myocardial tissue with minimal effect on surrounding tissues. Herein, we present 1-year clinical outcomes of PFA. METHODS: In 3 multicenter studies (IMPULSE [A Safety and Feasibility Study of the IOWA Approach Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation], PEFCAT [A Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation], and PEFCAT II [Expanded Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Multi Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation]), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients underwent PVI using a basket or flower PFA catheter. Invasive remapping was performed at ∼2 to 3 months, and reconnected PVs were reisolated with PFA or radiofrequency ablation. After a 90-day blanking period, arrhythmia recurrence was assessed over 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: In 121 patients, acute PVI was achieved in 100% of PVs with PFA alone. PV remapping, performed in 110 patients at 93.0 ± 30.1 days, demonstrated durable PVI in 84.8% of PVs (64.5% of patients), and 96.0% of PVs (84.1% of patients) treated with the optimized biphasic energy PFA waveform. Primary adverse events occurred in 2.5% of patients (2 pericardial effusions or tamponade, 1 hematoma); in addition, there was 1 transient ischemic attack. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from any atrial arrhythmia for the entire cohort and for the optimized biphasic energy PFA waveform cohort were 78.5 ± 3.8% and 84.5 ± 5.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PVI with a "single-shot" PFA catheter results in excellent PVI durability and acceptable safety with a low 1-year rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. These data mitigate concern that the nonthermal ablative mechanism of PFA might mask undiscovered compromises to clinical success. (IMPULSE: A Safety and Feasibility Study of the IOWA Approach Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation, NCT03700385; A Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, NCT03714178; PEFCAT II Expanded Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Multi Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation [PEFCAT II], NCT04170608).

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21025806
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026133500.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.014 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33933412
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Reddy, Vivek Y $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: vivek.reddy@mountsinai.org
245    10
$a Pulsed Field Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II / $c VY. Reddy, SR. Dukkipati, P. Neuzil, A. Anic, J. Petru, M. Funasako, H. Cochet, K. Minami, T. Breskovic, I. Sikiric, L. Sediva, M. Chovanec, J. Koruth, P. Jais
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using pulsed field ablation (PFA) translates to freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence without an increase in adverse events. BACKGROUND: PFA is a nonthermal ablative modality that, in preclinical studies, is able to preferentially ablate myocardial tissue with minimal effect on surrounding tissues. Herein, we present 1-year clinical outcomes of PFA. METHODS: In 3 multicenter studies (IMPULSE [A Safety and Feasibility Study of the IOWA Approach Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation], PEFCAT [A Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation], and PEFCAT II [Expanded Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Multi Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation]), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients underwent PVI using a basket or flower PFA catheter. Invasive remapping was performed at ∼2 to 3 months, and reconnected PVs were reisolated with PFA or radiofrequency ablation. After a 90-day blanking period, arrhythmia recurrence was assessed over 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: In 121 patients, acute PVI was achieved in 100% of PVs with PFA alone. PV remapping, performed in 110 patients at 93.0 ± 30.1 days, demonstrated durable PVI in 84.8% of PVs (64.5% of patients), and 96.0% of PVs (84.1% of patients) treated with the optimized biphasic energy PFA waveform. Primary adverse events occurred in 2.5% of patients (2 pericardial effusions or tamponade, 1 hematoma); in addition, there was 1 transient ischemic attack. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from any atrial arrhythmia for the entire cohort and for the optimized biphasic energy PFA waveform cohort were 78.5 ± 3.8% and 84.5 ± 5.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PVI with a "single-shot" PFA catheter results in excellent PVI durability and acceptable safety with a low 1-year rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. These data mitigate concern that the nonthermal ablative mechanism of PFA might mask undiscovered compromises to clinical success. (IMPULSE: A Safety and Feasibility Study of the IOWA Approach Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation, NCT03700385; A Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, NCT03714178; PEFCAT II Expanded Safety and Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE Endocardial Multi Ablation System to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation [PEFCAT II], NCT04170608).
650    12
$a fibrilace síní $x chirurgie $7 D001281
650    12
$a katetrizační ablace $7 D017115
650    _2
$a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a venae pulmonales $x chirurgie $7 D011667
650    _2
$a recidiva $7 D012008
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Dukkipati, Srinivas R $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Neuzil, Petr $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Anic, Ante $u Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital Split, Split, Croatia
700    1_
$a Petru, Jan $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Funasako, Moritoshi $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Cochet, Hubert $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Minami, Kentaro $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Breskovic, Toni $u Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital Split, Split, Croatia
700    1_
$a Sikiric, Ivan $u Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital Split, Split, Croatia
700    1_
$a Sediva, Lucie $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Chovanec, Milan $u Department of Cardiology, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Koruth, Jacob $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Jais, Pierre $u IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
773    0_
$w MED00193518 $t JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $x 2405-5018 $g Roč. 7, č. 5 (2021), s. 614-627
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33933412 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026133506 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1714727 $s 1146313
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 7 $c 5 $d 614-627 $e 20210428 $i 2405-5018 $m JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $n JACC Clin Electrophysiol $x MED00193518
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...