-
Something wrong with this record ?
Best practices in the flow cytometry of microalgae
D. Čertnerová, DW. Galbraith
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2003 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2012-06-01 to 1 year ago
Wiley Free Content
from 2003 to 1 year ago
PubMed
33611833
DOI
10.1002/cyto.a.24328
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Biomass MeSH
- Biotechnology MeSH
- Genome Size MeSH
- Ecosystem MeSH
- Microalgae * MeSH
- Flow Cytometry MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Microalgae are photosynthetic microorganisms with a major influence on global ecosystems. Further, owing to the production of various secondary metabolites, microalgae are also intensively studied for their enormous potential in biotechnology and its applications. While flow cytometry (FCM) is a fast and reliable method particularly suitable for genome size estimation in plant and animal studies, its application to microalgae often comes with many methodological challenges due to specific issues (e.g., cell wall composition, and presence of various secondary metabolites). Sample preparation requires considerable amounts of biomass, chemical fixation, and/or extraction of cellular components. In genome size estimation, appropriate methods for isolation of intact nuclei (using lysis buffers, razor-blade chopping, various enzymes, or bead-beating of cells) are essential for successful and high-quality analyses. Nuclear DNA amounts of microalgae diverge greatly, varying by almost 30,000-fold (0.01 to 286 pg). Even though new algal reference standards for genome size are now being introduced, animal red blood cells and nuclei from plant tissues are still predominantly used. Due to our limited knowledge of microalgal life cycles, particular caution should be taken during 1C/2C-value (or ploidy level) assignments.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21025887
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026133417.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/cyto.a.24328 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33611833
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Čertnerová, Dora $u Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Best practices in the flow cytometry of microalgae / $c D. Čertnerová, DW. Galbraith
- 520 9_
- $a Microalgae are photosynthetic microorganisms with a major influence on global ecosystems. Further, owing to the production of various secondary metabolites, microalgae are also intensively studied for their enormous potential in biotechnology and its applications. While flow cytometry (FCM) is a fast and reliable method particularly suitable for genome size estimation in plant and animal studies, its application to microalgae often comes with many methodological challenges due to specific issues (e.g., cell wall composition, and presence of various secondary metabolites). Sample preparation requires considerable amounts of biomass, chemical fixation, and/or extraction of cellular components. In genome size estimation, appropriate methods for isolation of intact nuclei (using lysis buffers, razor-blade chopping, various enzymes, or bead-beating of cells) are essential for successful and high-quality analyses. Nuclear DNA amounts of microalgae diverge greatly, varying by almost 30,000-fold (0.01 to 286 pg). Even though new algal reference standards for genome size are now being introduced, animal red blood cells and nuclei from plant tissues are still predominantly used. Due to our limited knowledge of microalgal life cycles, particular caution should be taken during 1C/2C-value (or ploidy level) assignments.
- 650 _2
- $a biomasa $7 D018533
- 650 _2
- $a biotechnologie $7 D001709
- 650 _2
- $a ekosystém $7 D017753
- 650 _2
- $a průtoková cytometrie $7 D005434
- 650 _2
- $a délka genomu $7 D059646
- 650 12
- $a mikrořasy $7 D058086
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Galbraith, David W $u School of Plant Sciences, BIO5 Institute, Arizona Cancer Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA $u Henan University, School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Adaptation and Improvement, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, Jin Ming Avenue, Kaifeng, China
- 773 0_
- $w MED00013935 $t Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology $x 1552-4930 $g Roč. 99, č. 4 (2021), s. 359-364
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33611833 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026133424 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1714790 $s 1146394
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 99 $c 4 $d 359-364 $e 20210302 $i 1552-4930 $m Cytometry. Part A $n Cytometry A $x MED00013935
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013