• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Best practices in the flow cytometry of microalgae

D. Čertnerová, DW. Galbraith

. 2021 ; 99 (4) : 359-364. [pub] 20210302

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21025887
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2003 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2012-06-01 do Před 1 rokem
Wiley Free Content od 2003 do Před 1 rokem

Microalgae are photosynthetic microorganisms with a major influence on global ecosystems. Further, owing to the production of various secondary metabolites, microalgae are also intensively studied for their enormous potential in biotechnology and its applications. While flow cytometry (FCM) is a fast and reliable method particularly suitable for genome size estimation in plant and animal studies, its application to microalgae often comes with many methodological challenges due to specific issues (e.g., cell wall composition, and presence of various secondary metabolites). Sample preparation requires considerable amounts of biomass, chemical fixation, and/or extraction of cellular components. In genome size estimation, appropriate methods for isolation of intact nuclei (using lysis buffers, razor-blade chopping, various enzymes, or bead-beating of cells) are essential for successful and high-quality analyses. Nuclear DNA amounts of microalgae diverge greatly, varying by almost 30,000-fold (0.01 to 286 pg). Even though new algal reference standards for genome size are now being introduced, animal red blood cells and nuclei from plant tissues are still predominantly used. Due to our limited knowledge of microalgal life cycles, particular caution should be taken during 1C/2C-value (or ploidy level) assignments.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21025887
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026133417.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/cyto.a.24328 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33611833
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Čertnerová, Dora $u Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Best practices in the flow cytometry of microalgae / $c D. Čertnerová, DW. Galbraith
520    9_
$a Microalgae are photosynthetic microorganisms with a major influence on global ecosystems. Further, owing to the production of various secondary metabolites, microalgae are also intensively studied for their enormous potential in biotechnology and its applications. While flow cytometry (FCM) is a fast and reliable method particularly suitable for genome size estimation in plant and animal studies, its application to microalgae often comes with many methodological challenges due to specific issues (e.g., cell wall composition, and presence of various secondary metabolites). Sample preparation requires considerable amounts of biomass, chemical fixation, and/or extraction of cellular components. In genome size estimation, appropriate methods for isolation of intact nuclei (using lysis buffers, razor-blade chopping, various enzymes, or bead-beating of cells) are essential for successful and high-quality analyses. Nuclear DNA amounts of microalgae diverge greatly, varying by almost 30,000-fold (0.01 to 286 pg). Even though new algal reference standards for genome size are now being introduced, animal red blood cells and nuclei from plant tissues are still predominantly used. Due to our limited knowledge of microalgal life cycles, particular caution should be taken during 1C/2C-value (or ploidy level) assignments.
650    _2
$a biomasa $7 D018533
650    _2
$a biotechnologie $7 D001709
650    _2
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    _2
$a průtoková cytometrie $7 D005434
650    _2
$a délka genomu $7 D059646
650    12
$a mikrořasy $7 D058086
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Galbraith, David W $u School of Plant Sciences, BIO5 Institute, Arizona Cancer Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA $u Henan University, School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Adaptation and Improvement, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, Jin Ming Avenue, Kaifeng, China
773    0_
$w MED00013935 $t Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology $x 1552-4930 $g Roč. 99, č. 4 (2021), s. 359-364
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33611833 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026133424 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1714790 $s 1146394
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 99 $c 4 $d 359-364 $e 20210302 $i 1552-4930 $m Cytometry. Part A $n Cytometry A $x MED00013935
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...