Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Czech Version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale: Evaluation and Psychometric Properties

P. Tavel, J. Sandora, J. Furstova, A. Lacev, V. Husek, Z. Puzova, I. Polackova Solcova, K. Malinakova

. 2021 ; 124 (1) : 366-381. [pub] 20200102

Language English Country United States

Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article

Spirituality and spiritual well-being are connected with many areas of human life. Thus, especially in secular countries, there is a need for reliable validated instruments for measuring spirituality. The Spiritual Well-Being Scale is among the world's most often used tools; therefore, the aim of this study was its psychometrical evaluation in the secular environment of the Czech Republic on a nationally representative sample (n = 1797, mean age: 45.9 ± 17.67; 48.6% men). A non-parametric comparison of different sociodemographic groups showed a higher disposition for experiencing spirituality among women, older people, and divorced persons. Based on confirmatory factor analysis, negatively worded items were excluded using a polychoric correlation matrix. The new version of the scale consisting of 11 items had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85; McDonald's ωt = 0.91). The two-factor model of this shortened version, with factors corresponding to the Religious and the Existential subscales of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale, shows a satisfactory fit with the data, where the loadings of all items ranged from medium to high. Thus, this study offered a new version of the tool, convenient for measuring spiritual well-being in secular conditions.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21026152
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220530105745.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1177/0033294119898117 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31896313
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Tavel, Peter
245    10
$a Czech Version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale: Evaluation and Psychometric Properties / $c P. Tavel, J. Sandora, J. Furstova, A. Lacev, V. Husek, Z. Puzova, I. Polackova Solcova, K. Malinakova
520    9_
$a Spirituality and spiritual well-being are connected with many areas of human life. Thus, especially in secular countries, there is a need for reliable validated instruments for measuring spirituality. The Spiritual Well-Being Scale is among the world's most often used tools; therefore, the aim of this study was its psychometrical evaluation in the secular environment of the Czech Republic on a nationally representative sample (n = 1797, mean age: 45.9 ± 17.67; 48.6% men). A non-parametric comparison of different sociodemographic groups showed a higher disposition for experiencing spirituality among women, older people, and divorced persons. Based on confirmatory factor analysis, negatively worded items were excluded using a polychoric correlation matrix. The new version of the scale consisting of 11 items had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85; McDonald's ωt = 0.91). The two-factor model of this shortened version, with factors corresponding to the Religious and the Existential subscales of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale, shows a satisfactory fit with the data, where the loadings of all items ranged from medium to high. Thus, this study offered a new version of the tool, convenient for measuring spiritual well-being in secular conditions.
650    _2
$a faktorová analýza statistická $7 D005163
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a psychometrie $x normy $7 D011594
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    12
$a spiritualita $7 D029181
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Sandora, Jan
700    1_
$a Fürstová, Jana $7 _AN042275
700    1_
$a Lacev, Alek
700    1_
$a Husek, Vit
700    1_
$a Puzova, Zuzana $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Polackova Solcova, Iva $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Malinakova, Klara $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00181661 $t Psychological reports $x 1558-691X $g Roč. 124, č. 1 (2021), s. 366-381
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31896313 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220530105743 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1714999 $s 1146659
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 124 $c 1 $d 366-381 $e 20200102 $i 1558-691X $m Psychological reports $n Psychol Rep $x MED00181661
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...