• Something wrong with this record ?

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update

M. Rouprêt, M. Babjuk, M. Burger, O. Capoun, D. Cohen, EM. Compérat, NC. Cowan, JL. Dominguez-Escrig, P. Gontero, A. Hugh Mostafid, J. Palou, B. Peyronnet, T. Seisen, V. Soukup, RJ. Sylvester, BWGV. Rhijn, R. Zigeuner, SF. Shariat

. 2021 ; 79 (1) : 62-79. [pub] 20200624

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article, Practice Guideline

CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate recommendations into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified following a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUC were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, upper urinary tract carcinoma, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Owing to the rarity of UTUC, there are insufficient data to provide strong recommendations. The 2017 tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis and risk stratification as well as for radical and conservative treatment, and prognostic factors are discussed. A single postoperative dose of intravesical mitomycin after nephroureterectomy reduces the risk of bladder tumour recurrence. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumour and two functional kidneys. After radical nephroureterectomy, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is indicated in locally advanced UTUC. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen, based on the proposed risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY: Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, an appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.

Department of Pathology Sorbonne University Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris Hopital Tenon Paris France

Department of Radiology The Queen Alexandra Hospital Portsmouth UK

Department of Surgical Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Urology Caritas St Josef Medical Center University of Regensburg Regensburg Germany

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Centre Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Fundacio Puigvert Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Department of Urology Hospital Motol 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of urology university of Rennes Rennes France

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA

Division of Urology Molinette Hospital University of Torino School of Medicine Torino Italy

EAU Guidelines Office Arnhem The Netherlands

Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health 1 M Sechenov 1st Moscow State Medical University Moscow Russia

Royal Surrey Hospital Guildford UK

Urology Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología Valencia Spain

Urology General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Praha Prague Czech Republic

Urology GRC n°5 Predictive ONCO URO Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital AP HP Sorbonne University Paris France

Urology Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust Royal Free Hospital London UK

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21026245
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026133059.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.042 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32593530
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Rouprêt, Morgan $u Urology, GRC n°5, Predictive ONCO-URO, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France. Electronic address: morgan.roupret@aphp.fr
245    10
$a European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update / $c M. Rouprêt, M. Babjuk, M. Burger, O. Capoun, D. Cohen, EM. Compérat, NC. Cowan, JL. Dominguez-Escrig, P. Gontero, A. Hugh Mostafid, J. Palou, B. Peyronnet, T. Seisen, V. Soukup, RJ. Sylvester, BWGV. Rhijn, R. Zigeuner, SF. Shariat
520    9_
$a CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate recommendations into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified following a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUC were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, upper urinary tract carcinoma, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Owing to the rarity of UTUC, there are insufficient data to provide strong recommendations. The 2017 tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis and risk stratification as well as for radical and conservative treatment, and prognostic factors are discussed. A single postoperative dose of intravesical mitomycin after nephroureterectomy reduces the risk of bladder tumour recurrence. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumour and two functional kidneys. After radical nephroureterectomy, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is indicated in locally advanced UTUC. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen, based on the proposed risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY: Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, an appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
650    _2
$a karcinom z přechodných buněk $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D002295
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a nádory ledvin $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D007680
650    12
$a ledvinná pánvička $7 D007682
650    _2
$a nádory močovodu $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D014516
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi $7 D017065
700    1_
$a Babjuk, Marko $u Department of Urology, Hospital Motol, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Burger, Maximilian $u Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Capoun, Otakar $u Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Cohen, Daniel $u Urology, Royal Free London-NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
700    1_
$a Compérat, Eva M $u Department of Pathology, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hopital Tenon, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Cowan, Nigel C $u Department of Radiology, The Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
700    1_
$a Dominguez-Escrig, Jose L $u Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
700    1_
$a Gontero, Paolo $u Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
700    1_
$a Hugh Mostafid, A $u Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
700    1_
$a Palou, Joan $u Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Peyronnet, Benoit $u Department of urology, university of Rennes, Rennes, France
700    1_
$a Seisen, Thomas $u Urology, GRC n°5, Predictive ONCO-URO, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Soukup, Viktor $u Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sylvester, Richard J $u EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Rhijn, Bas W G van $u Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Zigeuner, Richard $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Hospital Motol, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
773    0_
$w MED00001669 $t European urology $x 1873-7560 $g Roč. 79, č. 1 (2021), s. 62-79
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32593530 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026133105 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1715072 $s 1146752
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 79 $c 1 $d 62-79 $e 20200624 $i 1873-7560 $m European urology $n Eur Urol $x MED00001669
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...