• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Ostial dimensional changes after pulmonary vein isolation: Pulsed field ablation vs radiofrequency ablation

K. Kuroki, W. Whang, C. Eggert, J. Lam, J. Leavitt, I. Kawamura, A. Reddy, B. Morrow, C. Schneider, J. Petru, MK. Turagam, JS. Koruth, MA. Miller, S. Choudry, B. Ellsworth, SR. Dukkipati, P. Neuzil, VY. Reddy

. 2020 ; 17 (9) : 1528-1535. [pub] 20200504

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21026577

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis is an important potential complication of PV isolation using thermal modalities such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an alternative energy that causes nonthermal myocardial cell death. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of PFA vs RFA on the incidence and severity of PV narrowing or stenosis. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 4 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation trials using either PFA or RFA; because of absent CT scans or poor computed tomography scan quality, 73 of 153 patients (47.7%) were excluded. Baseline and 3-month cardiac computed tomography scans were reconstructed into 3-dimensional images, and the long and short axes of the PV ostia were quantitatively and qualitatively assessed in a randomized blinded manner by 2 physicians. RESULTS: A total of 299 PVs from 80 patients after either PFA (n = 37) or RFA (n = 43) were enrolled. PV ostial diameters decreased significantly less with PFA than with RFA (% change; long axis: 0.9% ± 8.5% vs -11.9% ± 16.3%; P < .001 and short axis: 3.4% ± 12.7% vs -12.9% ± 18.5%; P < .001). After a combined quantitative/qualitative analysis, mild (30%-49%), moderate (50%-69%), or severe (70%-100%) PV narrowing was observed, respectively, in 9.0% (15 of 166), 1.8% (3 of 166), and 1.2% (2 of 166) of PVs in the RFA cohort but in none of the PVs after PFA (P < .001). Overall, PV narrowing/stenosis was present in 0% and 0% vs 12.0% and 32.5% of PVs and patients who underwent PFA and RFA, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that unlike after RFA, the incidence and severity of PV narrowing/stenosis after PV isolation is virtually eliminated with PFA.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21026577
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026132805.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.04.040 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32380290
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Kuroki, Kenji $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
245    10
$a Ostial dimensional changes after pulmonary vein isolation: Pulsed field ablation vs radiofrequency ablation / $c K. Kuroki, W. Whang, C. Eggert, J. Lam, J. Leavitt, I. Kawamura, A. Reddy, B. Morrow, C. Schneider, J. Petru, MK. Turagam, JS. Koruth, MA. Miller, S. Choudry, B. Ellsworth, SR. Dukkipati, P. Neuzil, VY. Reddy
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis is an important potential complication of PV isolation using thermal modalities such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an alternative energy that causes nonthermal myocardial cell death. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of PFA vs RFA on the incidence and severity of PV narrowing or stenosis. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 4 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation trials using either PFA or RFA; because of absent CT scans or poor computed tomography scan quality, 73 of 153 patients (47.7%) were excluded. Baseline and 3-month cardiac computed tomography scans were reconstructed into 3-dimensional images, and the long and short axes of the PV ostia were quantitatively and qualitatively assessed in a randomized blinded manner by 2 physicians. RESULTS: A total of 299 PVs from 80 patients after either PFA (n = 37) or RFA (n = 43) were enrolled. PV ostial diameters decreased significantly less with PFA than with RFA (% change; long axis: 0.9% ± 8.5% vs -11.9% ± 16.3%; P < .001 and short axis: 3.4% ± 12.7% vs -12.9% ± 18.5%; P < .001). After a combined quantitative/qualitative analysis, mild (30%-49%), moderate (50%-69%), or severe (70%-100%) PV narrowing was observed, respectively, in 9.0% (15 of 166), 1.8% (3 of 166), and 1.2% (2 of 166) of PVs in the RFA cohort but in none of the PVs after PFA (P < .001). Overall, PV narrowing/stenosis was present in 0% and 0% vs 12.0% and 32.5% of PVs and patients who underwent PFA and RFA, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that unlike after RFA, the incidence and severity of PV narrowing/stenosis after PV isolation is virtually eliminated with PFA.
650    _2
$a fibrilace síní $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D001281
650    _2
$a katetrizační ablace $x metody $7 D017115
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a převodní systém srdeční $x patofyziologie $7 D006329
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a zobrazování trojrozměrné $x metody $7 D021621
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a venae pulmonales $x chirurgie $7 D011667
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Whang, William $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
700    1_
$a Eggert, Charles $u Farapulse Inc, Menlo Park, California
700    1_
$a Lam, Jeff $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
700    1_
$a Leavitt, Jonas $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
700    1_
$a Kawamura, Iwanari $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
700    1_
$a Reddy, Ananya $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
700    1_
$a Morrow, Blake $u Farapulse Inc, Menlo Park, California
700    1_
$a Schneider, Christopher $u Farapulse Inc, Menlo Park, California
700    1_
$a Petru, Jan $u Cardiology Department, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Turagam, Mohit K $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
700    1_
$a Koruth, Jacob S $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
700    1_
$a Miller, Marc A $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
700    1_
$a Choudry, Subbarao $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
700    1_
$a Ellsworth, Betsy $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
700    1_
$a Dukkipati, Srinivas R $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
700    1_
$a Neuzil, Petr $u Cardiology Department, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Reddy, Vivek Y $u Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Cardiology Department, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: vivek.reddy@mountsinai.org
773    0_
$w MED00156180 $t Heart rhythm $x 1556-3871 $g Roč. 17, č. 9 (2020), s. 1528-1535
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32380290 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026132811 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1715339 $s 1147084
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 17 $c 9 $d 1528-1535 $e 20200504 $i 1556-3871 $m Heart rhythm $n Heart Rhythm $x MED00156180
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace