• Something wrong with this record ?

Exemplifying endophytes of banana (Musa paradisiaca) for their potential role in growth stimulation and management of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp cubense causing panama wilt

AK. Savani, A. Bhattacharyya, RC. Boro, K. Dinesh, NS. Jc

. 2021 ; 66 (3) : 317-330. [pub] 20210120

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

In the present study, potentiality of endophytic microorganisms such as Rigidiporus vinctus AAU EF, Trichoderma reesei UH EF, and Sphingobacterium tabacisoli UH EB in the management of panama wilt and growth promotion of banana was assessed through artificial inoculation. During the study, a total of 220 bacterial and 110 fungal endophytes were isolated from root, pseudostem, and leaf samples of banana, and they were evaluated against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp cubense causing panama wilt. Out of total 330 bacterial and fungal endophytes, only five endophytes exhibited antagonism against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp cubense, out of which only three isolates, namely Trichoderma reesei UH EF, Rigidiporus vinctus AAU EF, and Sphingobacterium tabacisoli UH EB, produced indole acetic acid, siderophore, and hydrogen cyanide, except one bacterial strain Sphingobacterium tabacisoli UH EB which does not produce hydrogen cyanide. Furthermore, these three endophytes were identified through cultural and morphological characteristics as well as by the sequencing internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and 16S rRNA gene sequences analysis for bacteria, respectively. The response of host plant to endophyte inoculation was assessed by measuring the change in four growth parameters; plant height, pseudo stem girth (diameter), number of roots, and total number of leaves. The application of endophytes, irrespective of isolate and treatment type promoted the overall growth of the plant growth when compared with diseased plants with significant higher values recorded for all parameters assessed. The endophytes reported as growth promoters were found to have significant inhibition effect on Foc which can evidenced with lowest AUDPC values and epidemic rate at 99.09 units2 and 0.02 unit/day, respectively.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21028072
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211105134016.0
007      
ta
008      
211105s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s12223-021-00853-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33471292
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Savani, Ajit Kumar $u Department of Plant Pathology, Assam Agricultural University, 785013, Jorhat, India. ajitkumaragrico@gmail.com
245    10
$a Exemplifying endophytes of banana (Musa paradisiaca) for their potential role in growth stimulation and management of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp cubense causing panama wilt / $c AK. Savani, A. Bhattacharyya, RC. Boro, K. Dinesh, NS. Jc
520    9_
$a In the present study, potentiality of endophytic microorganisms such as Rigidiporus vinctus AAU EF, Trichoderma reesei UH EF, and Sphingobacterium tabacisoli UH EB in the management of panama wilt and growth promotion of banana was assessed through artificial inoculation. During the study, a total of 220 bacterial and 110 fungal endophytes were isolated from root, pseudostem, and leaf samples of banana, and they were evaluated against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp cubense causing panama wilt. Out of total 330 bacterial and fungal endophytes, only five endophytes exhibited antagonism against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp cubense, out of which only three isolates, namely Trichoderma reesei UH EF, Rigidiporus vinctus AAU EF, and Sphingobacterium tabacisoli UH EB, produced indole acetic acid, siderophore, and hydrogen cyanide, except one bacterial strain Sphingobacterium tabacisoli UH EB which does not produce hydrogen cyanide. Furthermore, these three endophytes were identified through cultural and morphological characteristics as well as by the sequencing internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and 16S rRNA gene sequences analysis for bacteria, respectively. The response of host plant to endophyte inoculation was assessed by measuring the change in four growth parameters; plant height, pseudo stem girth (diameter), number of roots, and total number of leaves. The application of endophytes, irrespective of isolate and treatment type promoted the overall growth of the plant growth when compared with diseased plants with significant higher values recorded for all parameters assessed. The endophytes reported as growth promoters were found to have significant inhibition effect on Foc which can evidenced with lowest AUDPC values and epidemic rate at 99.09 units2 and 0.02 unit/day, respectively.
650    12
$a endofyty $x fyziologie $7 D060026
650    12
$a Fusarium $x fyziologie $7 D005670
650    _2
$a Hypocreales $x fyziologie $7 D006999
650    _2
$a mikrobiální interakce $x fyziologie $7 D056265
650    12
$a banánovník $x mikrobiologie $7 D028521
650    12
$a nemoci rostlin $x mikrobiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D010935
650    _2
$a Polyporales $x fyziologie $7 D020072
650    _2
$a RNA ribozomální 16S $x genetika $7 D012336
650    _2
$a Sphingobacterium $x fyziologie $7 D045249
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Bhattacharyya, Ashok $u Department of Plant Pathology, Assam Agricultural University, 785013, Jorhat, India
700    1_
$a Boro, Robin Chandra $u Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, 785013, Jorhat, India
700    1_
$a Dinesh, K $u Department of Plant Pathology, Central Agricultural University, 795004, Imphal, India
700    1_
$a Jc, Nanjunda Swamy $u Department of Plant Pathology, Assam Agricultural University, 785013, Jorhat, India
773    0_
$w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 66, č. 3 (2021), s. 317-330
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33471292 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211105134021 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1719450 $s 1148617
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 66 $c 3 $d 317-330 $e 20210120 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211105

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...