Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

The Contributory Role of Cell Blocks in Salivary Gland Neoplasms Fine Needle Aspirations Classified by the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology

E. Tommola, D. Kalfert, H. Hakso-Mäkinen, I. Kholová

. 2021 ; 11 (10) : . [pub] 20210927

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
X5211 Pirkanmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri
Support Foundation Pirkanmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri
2019 Tampereen Tuberkuloosisäätiö
Progres Q28/LF1 (UNCE 204013) Univerzita Karlova v Praze

(1) Background: The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was introduced in 2018, bringing an organ-specific classification system for salivary gland cytopathology. The aim of present study is to evaluate the MSRSGC prospectively, based on a two-year experience in the tertiary care center pathology department, and evaluate the role of routine cell block (CB) preparation in salivary gland cytopathological diagnostics. (2) Methods: In our institution, the Department of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland, the MSRSGC has been implemented in salivary gland cytopathology since January 2018 and, over a two-year period (January 2018-December 2019), there were 365 fine-needle aspirations, of which 164 had a surgical follow-up. The CB methods used were Plasma-thrombin, the collection of visible fragments, and the Shandon and in-house methods. (3) Results: The MSRSGC diagnostic figures were as follows: accuracy 87.5%, sensitivity 45.8% and specificity 98.9%. For diagnostic categories of MSRSGC (non-neoplastic, benign neoplasm and malignant neoplasm) (n = 63) diagnostic accuracy was 98.4%, and for undetermined categories (atypia of undetermined significance, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential and suspicious for malignancy) (n = 49) diagnostic accuracy was 73.5%. Non-contributory cell blocks resulted more often in a false negative diagnosis (25%, 3/12) than a true negative diagnosis (10%, 7/73, p < 0.001), and is, most likely, an insufficient cytological diagnosis (86%, 18/21, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: The application of MSRSGC and CBs are beneficial in salivary gland cytological diagnosis, increasing diagnostic accuracy and, thus, patients' management and treatment.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22001679
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220112153656.0
007      
ta
008      
220107s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/diagnostics11101778 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34679476
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Tommola, Erkka $u Fimlab Laboratories, Department of Pathology, Tampere University Hospital, 33520 Tampere, Finland $u Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland
245    14
$a The Contributory Role of Cell Blocks in Salivary Gland Neoplasms Fine Needle Aspirations Classified by the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology / $c E. Tommola, D. Kalfert, H. Hakso-Mäkinen, I. Kholová
520    9_
$a (1) Background: The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was introduced in 2018, bringing an organ-specific classification system for salivary gland cytopathology. The aim of present study is to evaluate the MSRSGC prospectively, based on a two-year experience in the tertiary care center pathology department, and evaluate the role of routine cell block (CB) preparation in salivary gland cytopathological diagnostics. (2) Methods: In our institution, the Department of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland, the MSRSGC has been implemented in salivary gland cytopathology since January 2018 and, over a two-year period (January 2018-December 2019), there were 365 fine-needle aspirations, of which 164 had a surgical follow-up. The CB methods used were Plasma-thrombin, the collection of visible fragments, and the Shandon and in-house methods. (3) Results: The MSRSGC diagnostic figures were as follows: accuracy 87.5%, sensitivity 45.8% and specificity 98.9%. For diagnostic categories of MSRSGC (non-neoplastic, benign neoplasm and malignant neoplasm) (n = 63) diagnostic accuracy was 98.4%, and for undetermined categories (atypia of undetermined significance, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential and suspicious for malignancy) (n = 49) diagnostic accuracy was 73.5%. Non-contributory cell blocks resulted more often in a false negative diagnosis (25%, 3/12) than a true negative diagnosis (10%, 7/73, p < 0.001), and is, most likely, an insufficient cytological diagnosis (86%, 18/21, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: The application of MSRSGC and CBs are beneficial in salivary gland cytological diagnosis, increasing diagnostic accuracy and, thus, patients' management and treatment.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kalfert, David $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Charles University, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hakso-Mäkinen, Heli $u Fimlab Laboratories, Department of Pathology, Tampere University Hospital, 33520 Tampere, Finland
700    1_
$a Kholová, Ivana $u Fimlab Laboratories, Department of Pathology, Tampere University Hospital, 33520 Tampere, Finland $u Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland
773    0_
$w MED00195450 $t Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) $x 2075-4418 $g Roč. 11, č. 10 (2021)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34679476 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20220107 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220112153652 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1745569 $s 1152826
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 11 $c 10 $e 20210927 $i 2075-4418 $m Diagnostics $n Diagnostics $x MED00195450
GRA    __
$a X5211 $p Pirkanmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri
GRA    __
$a Support Foundation $p Pirkanmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri
GRA    __
$a 2019 $p Tampereen Tuberkuloosisäätiö
GRA    __
$a Progres Q28/LF1 (UNCE 204013) $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220107

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...