-
Something wrong with this record ?
The bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host
N. Modrackova, A. Stovicek, J. Burtscher, P. Bolechova, J. Killer, KJ. Domig, V. Neuzil-Bunesova
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2011
Free Medical Journals
from 2011
Nature Open Access
from 2011-12-01
PubMed Central
from 2011
Europe PubMed Central
from 2011
ProQuest Central
from 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2011
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2011-12-01
- MeSH
- Bifidobacterium genetics isolation & purification MeSH
- Feces microbiology MeSH
- Microbiota * MeSH
- Primates microbiology MeSH
- Probiotics MeSH
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S genetics MeSH
- Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Bifidobacteria, which commonly inhabit the primate gut, are beneficial contributors to host wellbeing. Anatomical differences and natural habitat allow an arrangement of primates into two main parvorders; New World monkeys (NWM) and Old World monkeys (OWM). The number of newly described bifidobacterial species is clearly elevated in NWM. This corresponds to our finding that bifidobacteria were the dominant group of cultivated gut anaerobes in NWM, while their numbers halved in OWM and were often replaced by Clostridiaceae with sarcina morphology. We examined an extended MALDI-TOF MS database as a potential identification tool for rapid screening of bifidobacterial distribution in captive primates. Bifidobacterial isolates of NWM were assigned mainly to species of primate origin, while OWM possessed typically multi-host bifidobacteria. Moreover, bifidobacterial counts reflected the feed specialization of captive primates decreasing from frugivore-insectivores, gummivore-insectivores, frugivore-folivores to frugivore-omnivores. Amplicon sequencing analysis supported this trend with regards to the inverse ratio of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes. In addition, a significantly higher diversity of the bacterial population in OWM was found. The evolution specialization of primates seems to be responsible for Bifidobacterium abundance and species occurrence. Balanced microbiota of captive primates could be supported by optimized prebiotic and probiotic stimulation based on the primate host.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22004058
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127145610.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41598-021-94824-y $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34315970
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Modrackova, Nikol $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Czechia
- 245 14
- $a The bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host / $c N. Modrackova, A. Stovicek, J. Burtscher, P. Bolechova, J. Killer, KJ. Domig, V. Neuzil-Bunesova
- 520 9_
- $a Bifidobacteria, which commonly inhabit the primate gut, are beneficial contributors to host wellbeing. Anatomical differences and natural habitat allow an arrangement of primates into two main parvorders; New World monkeys (NWM) and Old World monkeys (OWM). The number of newly described bifidobacterial species is clearly elevated in NWM. This corresponds to our finding that bifidobacteria were the dominant group of cultivated gut anaerobes in NWM, while their numbers halved in OWM and were often replaced by Clostridiaceae with sarcina morphology. We examined an extended MALDI-TOF MS database as a potential identification tool for rapid screening of bifidobacterial distribution in captive primates. Bifidobacterial isolates of NWM were assigned mainly to species of primate origin, while OWM possessed typically multi-host bifidobacteria. Moreover, bifidobacterial counts reflected the feed specialization of captive primates decreasing from frugivore-insectivores, gummivore-insectivores, frugivore-folivores to frugivore-omnivores. Amplicon sequencing analysis supported this trend with regards to the inverse ratio of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes. In addition, a significantly higher diversity of the bacterial population in OWM was found. The evolution specialization of primates seems to be responsible for Bifidobacterium abundance and species occurrence. Balanced microbiota of captive primates could be supported by optimized prebiotic and probiotic stimulation based on the primate host.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a Bifidobacterium $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001644
- 650 _2
- $a feces $x mikrobiologie $7 D005243
- 650 12
- $a mikrobiota $7 D064307
- 650 _2
- $a primáti $x mikrobiologie $7 D011323
- 650 _2
- $a probiotika $7 D019936
- 650 _2
- $a RNA ribozomální 16S $x genetika $7 D012336
- 650 _2
- $a spektrometrie hmotnostní - ionizace laserem za účasti matrice $7 D019032
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Stovicek, Adam $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Burtscher, Johanna $u Institute of Food Science, Department of Food Science and Technology, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Muthgasse 18, 1190, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Bolechova, Petra $u Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Czechia $u Zoo Liberec, Lidove sady 425/1, Liberec 1, 460 01, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Killer, Jiri $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Czechia $u Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics V.V.I, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, Prague 4, 142 20, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Domig, Konrad J $u Institute of Food Science, Department of Food Science and Technology, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Muthgasse 18, 1190, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Neuzil-Bunesova, Vera $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Czechia. bunesova@af.czu.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 11, č. 1 (2021), s. 15273
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34315970 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127145606 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1751503 $s 1155207
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 11 $c 1 $d 15273 $e 20210727 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113
