Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

An assessment of PM1 levels based on indicative PM1 measurements and relationships with PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations, for the analysis of hospital admissions and mortality in the Moravian region

H. Šlachtová, I. Tomášek, P. Polaufová, L. Hellebrandová, A. Šplíchalová, H. Tomášková

. 2021 ; 72 (3) : 249-258. [pub] 20210330

Language English Country Poland

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Particulate matter (PM) air pollution is a serious concern in the city of Ostrava. Thus, in 2018, a project entitled "Validation of the relationships between PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 concentrations, and morbidity and mortality, in the heavily polluted region in the Czech Republic," was launched. The relationship between hospital admissions and mortality in the said region is based primarily on short-term PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations and indicative PM1 measurement. The analysis of spatiotemporal variations and the relationship between PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 data from 3 measurement sites within the city of Ostrava is presented. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis was based on the daily average PM concentrations for 5 and 6 months at 2 sites, and on the annual average values (2018-2019) at the baseline station. The correlations of and variability between PM fractions, seasonal differences and explanation of the differences found were the objectives of a detailed analysis. Especially, the potential PM1 variability and its causes were analyzed with respect to the location of the site. RESULTS: The study findings confirmed good correlations between the PM fractions. Compared to PM10, PM2.5 concentrations were more predictive for PM1 concentrations. The annual means of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 reached 37.5, 29.9 and 27.1 μg/m3 in 2018, respectively, and 25.8, 19.9 and 17.9 μg/m3 in 2019, respectively. The concentration levels in the non-heating season were significantly lower than in the heating season in the 2 years under consideration. The levels of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 were significantly correlated (the correlation coefficient, r > 0.96). The levels of PM2.5 represented about 0.82-0.86 of PM10, and the levels of PM1 about 0.92-0.93 of PM2.5. These ratios were found to differ in the heating and non-heating seasons, with the PM2.5-PM10 ratio ranging 0.61-0.63 in the non-heating seasons. CONCLUSIONS: The correlations found will be used for indicative PM1 measurements in other areas of the region. Seasonal variability should be taken into account as well. Med Pr. 2021;72(3):249-58.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22004173
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220127145448.0
007      
ta
008      
220113s2021 pl f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.13075/mp.5893.01078 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33835111
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a pl
100    1_
$a Šlachtová, Hana $u Institute of Public Health, Ostrava, Czech Republic
245    13
$a An assessment of PM1 levels based on indicative PM1 measurements and relationships with PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations, for the analysis of hospital admissions and mortality in the Moravian region / $c H. Šlachtová, I. Tomášek, P. Polaufová, L. Hellebrandová, A. Šplíchalová, H. Tomášková
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Particulate matter (PM) air pollution is a serious concern in the city of Ostrava. Thus, in 2018, a project entitled "Validation of the relationships between PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 concentrations, and morbidity and mortality, in the heavily polluted region in the Czech Republic," was launched. The relationship between hospital admissions and mortality in the said region is based primarily on short-term PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations and indicative PM1 measurement. The analysis of spatiotemporal variations and the relationship between PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 data from 3 measurement sites within the city of Ostrava is presented. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis was based on the daily average PM concentrations for 5 and 6 months at 2 sites, and on the annual average values (2018-2019) at the baseline station. The correlations of and variability between PM fractions, seasonal differences and explanation of the differences found were the objectives of a detailed analysis. Especially, the potential PM1 variability and its causes were analyzed with respect to the location of the site. RESULTS: The study findings confirmed good correlations between the PM fractions. Compared to PM10, PM2.5 concentrations were more predictive for PM1 concentrations. The annual means of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 reached 37.5, 29.9 and 27.1 μg/m3 in 2018, respectively, and 25.8, 19.9 and 17.9 μg/m3 in 2019, respectively. The concentration levels in the non-heating season were significantly lower than in the heating season in the 2 years under consideration. The levels of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 were significantly correlated (the correlation coefficient, r > 0.96). The levels of PM2.5 represented about 0.82-0.86 of PM10, and the levels of PM1 about 0.92-0.93 of PM2.5. These ratios were found to differ in the heating and non-heating seasons, with the PM2.5-PM10 ratio ranging 0.61-0.63 in the non-heating seasons. CONCLUSIONS: The correlations found will be used for indicative PM1 measurements in other areas of the region. Seasonal variability should be taken into account as well. Med Pr. 2021;72(3):249-58.
650    12
$a látky znečišťující vzduch $x škodlivé účinky $x analýza $7 D000393
650    12
$a znečištění ovzduší $x škodlivé účinky $x analýza $7 D000397
650    _2
$a monitorování životního prostředí $7 D004784
650    _2
$a nemocnice $7 D006761
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a velikost částic $7 D010316
650    _2
$a pevné částice $x analýza $7 D052638
650    _2
$a roční období $7 D012621
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Tomášek, Ivan $u Institute of Public Health, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Polaufová, Pavla $u Institute of Public Health, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hellebrandová, Lucie $u Institute of Public Health, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Šplíchalová, Anna $u Institute of Public Health, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tomášková, Hana $u Institute of Public Health, Ostrava, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00003320 $t Medycyna pracy $x 2353-1339 $g Roč. 72, č. 3 (2021), s. 249-258
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33835111 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220113 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220127145445 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1751589 $s 1155322
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 72 $c 3 $d 249-258 $e 20210330 $i 2353-1339 $m Medycyna pracy $n Med Pr $x MED00003320
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220113

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...