• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The development of infants' sensitivity to native versus non-native rhythm

N. Paillereau, VJ. Podlipský, F. Smolík, Š. Šimáčková, K. Chládková

. 2021 ; 26 (3) : 423-441. [pub] 20210227

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22004398

Speech rhythm is considered one of the first windows into the native language, and the taxonomy of rhythm classes is commonly used to explain early language discrimination. Relying on formal rhythm classification is problematic for two reasons. First, it is not known to which extent infants' sensitivity to language variation is attributable to rhythm alone, and second, it is not known how infants discriminate languages not classified in any of the putative rhythm classes. Employing a central-fixation preference paradigm with natural stimuli, this study tested whether infants differentially attend to native versus nonnative varieties that differ only in temporal rhythm cues, and both of which are rhythmically unclassified. An analysis of total looking time did not detect any rhythm preferences at any age. First-look duration, arguably more closely reflecting infants' underlying perceptual sensitivities, indicated age-specific preferences for native versus non-native rhythm: 4-month-olds seemed to prefer the native-, and 6-month-olds the non-native language-variety. These findings suggest that infants indeed acquire native rhythm cues rather early, by the 4th month, supporting the theory that rhythm can bootstrap further language development. Our data on infants' processing of rhythmically unclassified languages suggest that formal rhythm classification does not determine infants' ability to discriminate language varieties.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22004398
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221018095244.0
007      
ta
008      
220113s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/infa.12395 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33638595
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Paillereau, Nikola $u Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic $u Institute of Phonetics, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
245    14
$a The development of infants' sensitivity to native versus non-native rhythm / $c N. Paillereau, VJ. Podlipský, F. Smolík, Š. Šimáčková, K. Chládková
520    9_
$a Speech rhythm is considered one of the first windows into the native language, and the taxonomy of rhythm classes is commonly used to explain early language discrimination. Relying on formal rhythm classification is problematic for two reasons. First, it is not known to which extent infants' sensitivity to language variation is attributable to rhythm alone, and second, it is not known how infants discriminate languages not classified in any of the putative rhythm classes. Employing a central-fixation preference paradigm with natural stimuli, this study tested whether infants differentially attend to native versus nonnative varieties that differ only in temporal rhythm cues, and both of which are rhythmically unclassified. An analysis of total looking time did not detect any rhythm preferences at any age. First-look duration, arguably more closely reflecting infants' underlying perceptual sensitivities, indicated age-specific preferences for native versus non-native rhythm: 4-month-olds seemed to prefer the native-, and 6-month-olds the non-native language-variety. These findings suggest that infants indeed acquire native rhythm cues rather early, by the 4th month, supporting the theory that rhythm can bootstrap further language development. Our data on infants' processing of rhythmically unclassified languages suggest that formal rhythm classification does not determine infants' ability to discriminate language varieties.
650    _2
$a podněty $7 D003463
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kojenec $7 D007223
650    _2
$a jazyk (prostředek komunikace) $7 D007802
650    _2
$a vývoj řeči $7 D007804
650    _2
$a řeč $7 D013060
650    12
$a percepce řeči $7 D013067
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Podlipský, Václav Jonáš $u Department of English and American Studies, Faculty of Arts, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Smolík, Filip $u Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic $u Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Šimáčková, Šárka $u Department of English and American Studies, Faculty of Arts, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Chládková, Kateřina $u Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic $u Institute of Czech Language and Theory of Communication, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic $7 xx0277682
773    0_
$w MED00007247 $t Infancy $x 1532-7078 $g Roč. 26, č. 3 (2021), s. 423-441
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33638595 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220113 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221018095241 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1751763 $s 1155547
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 26 $c 3 $d 423-441 $e 20210227 $i 1532-7078 $m Infancy $n Infancy $x MED00007247
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220113

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace