-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Clinical Protocols for the Evaluation of Rod Function
K. Stingl, K. Stingl, K. Nowomiejska, L. Kuehlewein, S. Kohl, M. Kempf, T. Strasser, R. Jung, B. Wilhelm, T. Peters, C. Kelbsch, KU. Bartz-Schmidt, H. Langrova, E. Zrenner
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
32805733
DOI
10.1159/000510888
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- adaptace na tmu MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- klinické protokoly MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- testy zrakového pole * MeSH
- zdraví dobrovolníci pro lékařské studie MeSH
- zraková pole * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
This work presents a quick clinical protocol for dark-adapted chromatic (DAC) perimetry as well as a novel clinical tool, scotopic chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC). The goal of the study was to explore the applicability of these methods in a clinical setting, their test-retest repeatability, and the congruence of the results. Local rod sensitivity was assessed at 36 locations within 30° eccentricity of the visual field in 15 healthy subjects (mean age 43 ± 16 years; 7 females and 8 males) with DAC perimetry (red and cyan stimuli) and CPC 2 times in repeated measurements. The duration of individual measurements was 370 ± 5 s for CPC and 366 ± 62 s for DAC perimetry. The intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient was 0.53 for DAC perimetry cyan stimuli, 0.67 for red stimuli, and 0.93 for CPC. However, the spatial resolution of CPC was substantially smaller than in DAC perimetry. We did not find a correlation of DAC perimetry and CPC measurements on the global or the local level. In comparison to DAC perimetry, CPC shows a superior intervisit repeatability in detecting functional changes in the rod population in an objective way with lower spatial resolution. Our results also indicate that these 2 methods measure the rod function in different ways and could thus constitute complementary scotopic functional diagnostics.
Center for Rare Eye Diseases University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
Department of General Ophthalmology Medical University of Lublin Lublin Poland
Department of Ophthalmology Faculty of Medicine Charles University Hradec Králové Czechia
Institute for Ophthalmic Research Center for Ophthalmology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
STZ eyetrial Center for Ophthalmology University Tübingen Tübingen Germany
University Eye Hospital Center for Ophthalmology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22004741
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127145027.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1159/000510888 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32805733
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Stingl, Krunoslav $u University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany $u Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 245 10
- $a Clinical Protocols for the Evaluation of Rod Function / $c K. Stingl, K. Stingl, K. Nowomiejska, L. Kuehlewein, S. Kohl, M. Kempf, T. Strasser, R. Jung, B. Wilhelm, T. Peters, C. Kelbsch, KU. Bartz-Schmidt, H. Langrova, E. Zrenner
- 520 9_
- $a This work presents a quick clinical protocol for dark-adapted chromatic (DAC) perimetry as well as a novel clinical tool, scotopic chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC). The goal of the study was to explore the applicability of these methods in a clinical setting, their test-retest repeatability, and the congruence of the results. Local rod sensitivity was assessed at 36 locations within 30° eccentricity of the visual field in 15 healthy subjects (mean age 43 ± 16 years; 7 females and 8 males) with DAC perimetry (red and cyan stimuli) and CPC 2 times in repeated measurements. The duration of individual measurements was 370 ± 5 s for CPC and 366 ± 62 s for DAC perimetry. The intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient was 0.53 for DAC perimetry cyan stimuli, 0.67 for red stimuli, and 0.93 for CPC. However, the spatial resolution of CPC was substantially smaller than in DAC perimetry. We did not find a correlation of DAC perimetry and CPC measurements on the global or the local level. In comparison to DAC perimetry, CPC shows a superior intervisit repeatability in detecting functional changes in the rod population in an objective way with lower spatial resolution. Our results also indicate that these 2 methods measure the rod function in different ways and could thus constitute complementary scotopic functional diagnostics.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a klinické protokoly $7 D002985
- 650 _2
- $a adaptace na tmu $7 D003623
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a zdraví dobrovolníci pro lékařské studie $7 D064368
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a testy zrakového pole $7 D058609
- 650 12
- $a zraková pole $7 D014794
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Stingl, Katarina $u University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, katarina.stingl@med.uni-tuebingen.de $u Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, katarina.stingl@med.uni-tuebingen.de
- 700 1_
- $a Nowomiejska, Katarzyna $u Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany $u Department of General Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Kuehlewein, Laura $u University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany $u Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Kohl, Susanne $u Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Kempf, Melanie $u University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany $u Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Strasser, Torsten $u Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Jung, Ronja $u University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Wilhelm, Barbara $u STZ eyetrial, Center for Ophthalmology, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Peters, Tobias $u Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany $u STZ eyetrial, Center for Ophthalmology, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Kelbsch, Carina $u University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Bartz-Schmidt, Karl Ulrich $u University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Langrova, Hana $u Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Zrenner, Eberhart $u University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany $u Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany $u Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany $u Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience (CIN), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003619 $t Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde $x 1423-0267 $g Roč. 244, č. 5 (2021), s. 396-407
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32805733 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127145024 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1752042 $s 1155890
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 244 $c 5 $d 396-407 $e 20200817 $i 1423-0267 $m Ophthalmologica $n Ophthalmologica $x MED00003619
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113