-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Effects of mechanical ventilation versus apnea on bi-ventricular pressure-volume loop recording
M. Dam Lyhne, C. Schmidt Mortensen, J. Valentin Hansen, S. Juel Dragsbaek, JE. Nielsen-Kudsk, A. Andersen
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 1991
Free Medical Journals
od 1998
PubMed Central
od 2020
ProQuest Central
od 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2006-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2005-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2005-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1998
- MeSH
- apnoe diagnóza MeSH
- funkce levé komory srdeční fyziologie MeSH
- funkce pravé komory srdeční * MeSH
- komorový tlak (srdce) MeSH
- prasata MeSH
- srdeční komory * MeSH
- tepový objem fyziologie MeSH
- umělé dýchání škodlivé účinky MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Respiration changes intrathoracic pressure and lung volumes in a cyclic manner, which affect cardiac function. Invasive ventricular pressure-volume (PV) loops can be recorded during ongoing mechanical ventilation or in transient apnea. No consensus exists considering ventilatory mode during PV loop recording. The objective of this study was to investigate the magnitude of any systematic difference of bi-ventricular PV loop variables recorded during mechanical ventilation versus apnea. PV loops were recorded simultaneously from the right ventricle and left ventricle in a closed chest porcine model during mechanical ventilation and in transient apnea (n=72). Variables were compared by regression analyses. Mechanical ventilation versus apnea affected regression coefficients for important PV variables including right ventricular stroke volume (1.22, 95% CI [1.08-1.36], p=0.003), right ventricular ejection fraction (0.90, 95% CI [0.81-1.00], p=0.043) and right ventricular arterial elastance (0.61, 95%CI [0.55-0.68], p<0.0001). Right ventricular pressures and volumes were parallelly shifted with Y-intercepts different from 0. Few left ventricular variables were affected, mainly first derivatives of pressure (dP/dt(max): 0.96, 95% CI [0.92-0.99], p=0.016, and dP/dt(min): 0.92, 95% CI [0.86-0.99], p=0.026), which might be due to decreased heart rate in apnea (Y-intercept -6.88, 95% CI [-12.22; -1.54], p=0.012). We conclude, that right ventricular stroke volume, ejection fraction and arterial elastance were mostly affected by apnea compared to mechanical ventilation. The results motivate future standardization of respiratory modality when measuring PV relationships.
Department of Cardiology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22009481
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230331102956.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220419s2022 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.33549/physiolres.934787 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35043651
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Dam Lyhne, Mads $u Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- 245 10
- $a Effects of mechanical ventilation versus apnea on bi-ventricular pressure-volume loop recording / $c M. Dam Lyhne, C. Schmidt Mortensen, J. Valentin Hansen, S. Juel Dragsbaek, JE. Nielsen-Kudsk, A. Andersen
- 520 9_
- $a Respiration changes intrathoracic pressure and lung volumes in a cyclic manner, which affect cardiac function. Invasive ventricular pressure-volume (PV) loops can be recorded during ongoing mechanical ventilation or in transient apnea. No consensus exists considering ventilatory mode during PV loop recording. The objective of this study was to investigate the magnitude of any systematic difference of bi-ventricular PV loop variables recorded during mechanical ventilation versus apnea. PV loops were recorded simultaneously from the right ventricle and left ventricle in a closed chest porcine model during mechanical ventilation and in transient apnea (n=72). Variables were compared by regression analyses. Mechanical ventilation versus apnea affected regression coefficients for important PV variables including right ventricular stroke volume (1.22, 95% CI [1.08-1.36], p=0.003), right ventricular ejection fraction (0.90, 95% CI [0.81-1.00], p=0.043) and right ventricular arterial elastance (0.61, 95%CI [0.55-0.68], p<0.0001). Right ventricular pressures and volumes were parallelly shifted with Y-intercepts different from 0. Few left ventricular variables were affected, mainly first derivatives of pressure (dP/dt(max): 0.96, 95% CI [0.92-0.99], p=0.016, and dP/dt(min): 0.92, 95% CI [0.86-0.99], p=0.026), which might be due to decreased heart rate in apnea (Y-intercept -6.88, 95% CI [-12.22; -1.54], p=0.012). We conclude, that right ventricular stroke volume, ejection fraction and arterial elastance were mostly affected by apnea compared to mechanical ventilation. The results motivate future standardization of respiratory modality when measuring PV relationships.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a apnoe $x diagnóza $7 D001049
- 650 12
- $a srdeční komory $7 D006352
- 650 _2
- $a umělé dýchání $x škodlivé účinky $7 D012121
- 650 _2
- $a tepový objem $x fyziologie $7 D013318
- 650 _2
- $a prasata $7 D013552
- 650 _2
- $a funkce levé komory srdeční $x fyziologie $7 D016277
- 650 12
- $a funkce pravé komory srdeční $7 D016278
- 650 _2
- $a komorový tlak (srdce) $7 D017725
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Schmidt Mortensen, Christian $u Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- 700 1_
- $a Valentin Hansen, Jacob $u Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- 700 1_
- $a Juel Dragsbaek, Simone $u Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- 700 1_
- $a Nielsen-Kudsk, Jens Erik $u Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- 700 1_
- $a Andersen, Asger $u Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003824 $t Physiological research $x 1802-9973 $g Roč. 71, č. 1 (2022), s. 103-111
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35043651 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 4120 $c 266 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220419 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230331102951 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1796989 $s 1160679
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 71 $c 1 $d 103-111 $e 20220119 $i 1802-9973 $m Physiological research $n Physiol. Res. (Print) $x MED00003824
- LZP __
- $b NLK198 $a Pubmed-20220419