Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Effects of mechanical ventilation versus apnea on bi-ventricular pressure-volume loop recording

M. Dam Lyhne, C. Schmidt Mortensen, J. Valentin Hansen, S. Juel Dragsbaek, JE. Nielsen-Kudsk, A. Andersen

. 2022 ; 71 (1) : 103-111. [pub] 20220119

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22009481

Respiration changes intrathoracic pressure and lung volumes in a cyclic manner, which affect cardiac function. Invasive ventricular pressure-volume (PV) loops can be recorded during ongoing mechanical ventilation or in transient apnea. No consensus exists considering ventilatory mode during PV loop recording. The objective of this study was to investigate the magnitude of any systematic difference of bi-ventricular PV loop variables recorded during mechanical ventilation versus apnea. PV loops were recorded simultaneously from the right ventricle and left ventricle in a closed chest porcine model during mechanical ventilation and in transient apnea (n=72). Variables were compared by regression analyses. Mechanical ventilation versus apnea affected regression coefficients for important PV variables including right ventricular stroke volume (1.22, 95% CI [1.08-1.36], p=0.003), right ventricular ejection fraction (0.90, 95% CI [0.81-1.00], p=0.043) and right ventricular arterial elastance (0.61, 95%CI [0.55-0.68], p<0.0001). Right ventricular pressures and volumes were parallelly shifted with Y-intercepts different from 0. Few left ventricular variables were affected, mainly first derivatives of pressure (dP/dt(max): 0.96, 95% CI [0.92-0.99], p=0.016, and dP/dt(min): 0.92, 95% CI [0.86-0.99], p=0.026), which might be due to decreased heart rate in apnea (Y-intercept -6.88, 95% CI [-12.22; -1.54], p=0.012). We conclude, that right ventricular stroke volume, ejection fraction and arterial elastance were mostly affected by apnea compared to mechanical ventilation. The results motivate future standardization of respiratory modality when measuring PV relationships.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22009481
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230331102956.0
007      
ta
008      
220419s2022 xr d f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.33549/physiolres.934787 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35043651
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Dam Lyhne, Mads $u Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
245    10
$a Effects of mechanical ventilation versus apnea on bi-ventricular pressure-volume loop recording / $c M. Dam Lyhne, C. Schmidt Mortensen, J. Valentin Hansen, S. Juel Dragsbaek, JE. Nielsen-Kudsk, A. Andersen
520    9_
$a Respiration changes intrathoracic pressure and lung volumes in a cyclic manner, which affect cardiac function. Invasive ventricular pressure-volume (PV) loops can be recorded during ongoing mechanical ventilation or in transient apnea. No consensus exists considering ventilatory mode during PV loop recording. The objective of this study was to investigate the magnitude of any systematic difference of bi-ventricular PV loop variables recorded during mechanical ventilation versus apnea. PV loops were recorded simultaneously from the right ventricle and left ventricle in a closed chest porcine model during mechanical ventilation and in transient apnea (n=72). Variables were compared by regression analyses. Mechanical ventilation versus apnea affected regression coefficients for important PV variables including right ventricular stroke volume (1.22, 95% CI [1.08-1.36], p=0.003), right ventricular ejection fraction (0.90, 95% CI [0.81-1.00], p=0.043) and right ventricular arterial elastance (0.61, 95%CI [0.55-0.68], p<0.0001). Right ventricular pressures and volumes were parallelly shifted with Y-intercepts different from 0. Few left ventricular variables were affected, mainly first derivatives of pressure (dP/dt(max): 0.96, 95% CI [0.92-0.99], p=0.016, and dP/dt(min): 0.92, 95% CI [0.86-0.99], p=0.026), which might be due to decreased heart rate in apnea (Y-intercept -6.88, 95% CI [-12.22; -1.54], p=0.012). We conclude, that right ventricular stroke volume, ejection fraction and arterial elastance were mostly affected by apnea compared to mechanical ventilation. The results motivate future standardization of respiratory modality when measuring PV relationships.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a apnoe $x diagnóza $7 D001049
650    12
$a srdeční komory $7 D006352
650    _2
$a umělé dýchání $x škodlivé účinky $7 D012121
650    _2
$a tepový objem $x fyziologie $7 D013318
650    _2
$a prasata $7 D013552
650    _2
$a funkce levé komory srdeční $x fyziologie $7 D016277
650    12
$a funkce pravé komory srdeční $7 D016278
650    _2
$a komorový tlak (srdce) $7 D017725
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Schmidt Mortensen, Christian $u Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
700    1_
$a Valentin Hansen, Jacob $u Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
700    1_
$a Juel Dragsbaek, Simone $u Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
700    1_
$a Nielsen-Kudsk, Jens Erik $u Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
700    1_
$a Andersen, Asger $u Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
773    0_
$w MED00003824 $t Physiological research $x 1802-9973 $g Roč. 71, č. 1 (2022), s. 103-111
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35043651 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 4120 $c 266 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220419 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230331102951 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1796989 $s 1160679
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 71 $c 1 $d 103-111 $e 20220119 $i 1802-9973 $m Physiological research $n Physiol. Res. (Print) $x MED00003824
LZP    __
$b NLK198 $a Pubmed-20220419

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...