Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparing the CAM-ICU and ICDSC for assessing delirium in non-intubated intensive care patients

Hana Locihová, Karel Axmann

. 2022 ; 13 (1) : 587-594. [pub] 20220305

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22009551

Aim: The study compared two instruments for detecting delirium, the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) and the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) as a reference method. Design: Prospective observational study. Methods: The study included 126 consecutive patients staying in the intensive care unit (ICU) for more than 24 hours. The diagnostic properties of both questionnaires and agreement between them were studied and compared. Additionally, the two tests were used to assess the relationship between selected patient parameters and the presence of delirium. Results: There was a high level of agreement between the CAM-ICU and ICDSC, as expressed by Cohen's κ of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.821-0.838). Cronbach's α assessing the internal consistency of a Czech version of the CAM-ICU and ICDSC was 0.903 and 0.865, respectively. The CAM-ICU had 85.5% sensitivity (95% CI: 84.6-91.8) and 94.1% specificity (95% CI: 92.4-95.5); the ICDSC (cut-off ≥ 4) had 90.6% sensitivity (95% CI: 87.0-93.5) and 89.0% specificity (95% CI: 86.8-91.0). Conclusion: Both compared diagnostic instruments, the CAM-ICU and ICDSC, appear to be adequate and usable. When compared with the CAM-ICU as a reference method, the ICDSC showed similar results and a good level of agreement.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22009551
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220629144200.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
220419s2022 xr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.15452/cejnm.2021.12.0033 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Locihová, Hana $u Department of Intensive Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Forensic Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava $u AGEL Educational and Research Institute (VIA), Prostějov $u AGEL Secondary Nursing School and Higher Nursing School, Ostrava $7 xx0240540
245    10
$a Comparing the CAM-ICU and ICDSC for assessing delirium in non-intubated intensive care patients / $c Hana Locihová, Karel Axmann
520    9_
$a Aim: The study compared two instruments for detecting delirium, the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) and the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) as a reference method. Design: Prospective observational study. Methods: The study included 126 consecutive patients staying in the intensive care unit (ICU) for more than 24 hours. The diagnostic properties of both questionnaires and agreement between them were studied and compared. Additionally, the two tests were used to assess the relationship between selected patient parameters and the presence of delirium. Results: There was a high level of agreement between the CAM-ICU and ICDSC, as expressed by Cohen's κ of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.821-0.838). Cronbach's α assessing the internal consistency of a Czech version of the CAM-ICU and ICDSC was 0.903 and 0.865, respectively. The CAM-ICU had 85.5% sensitivity (95% CI: 84.6-91.8) and 94.1% specificity (95% CI: 92.4-95.5); the ICDSC (cut-off ≥ 4) had 90.6% sensitivity (95% CI: 87.0-93.5) and 89.0% specificity (95% CI: 86.8-91.0). Conclusion: Both compared diagnostic instruments, the CAM-ICU and ICDSC, appear to be adequate and usable. When compared with the CAM-ICU as a reference method, the ICDSC showed similar results and a good level of agreement.
650    _7
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a pozorovací studie jako téma $7 D064887 $2 czmesh
650    17
$a delirium $x diagnóza $x ošetřování $x terapie $7 D003693 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a pooperační delirium $7 D000071257 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a mechanické ventilátory $7 D012122 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a ošetřovatelská péče o pacienty v kritickém stavu $7 D064648 $2 czmesh
650    _7
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307 $2 czmesh
653    __
$a Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) $a delirium $a Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) $a intensive care unit (ICU)
700    1_
$a Axmann, Karel, $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc $d 1983- $7 xx0221870
773    0_
$t Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery $x 2336-3517 $g Roč. 13, č. 1 (2022), s. 587-594 $w MED00183333
856    41
$u https://cejnm.osu.cz/artkey/cjn-202201-0005_comparing-the-cam-icu-and-icdsc-for-assessing-delirium-in-non-intubated-intensive-care-patients.php $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220419 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220629144155 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1797022 $s 1160749
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 13 $c 1 $d 587-594 $e 20220305 $i 2336-3517 $m Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery $x MED00183333
LZP    __
$c NLK183 $d 20220629 $b NLK111 $a Actavia-MED00183333-20220419

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace