-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Are ovine and porcine carotid arteries equivalent animal models for experimental cardiac surgery: A quantitative histological comparison
M. Grajciarová, D. Turek, A. Malečková, R. Pálek, V. Liška, P. Tomášek, M. Králičková, Z. Tonar
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- arteriae carotides chirurgie MeSH
- intimomediální šíře tepenné stěny * MeSH
- koronární bypass metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mamární tepny * MeSH
- modely u zvířat MeSH
- ovce MeSH
- prasata MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a common cardiac surgery. Manufacturing small-diameter (2-5 mm) vascular grafts for CABG is important for patients who lack first-choice autologous arterial, or venous conduits. Ovine and porcine common carotid arteries (CCAs) are used as large animal models for in vivo testing of newly developed tissue-engineered arterial grafts. It is unknown to what extent these models are interchangeable and whether the left and right arteries of the same subjects can be used as experimental controls. Therefore, we compared the microscopic structure of paired left and right ovine and porcine CCAs in the proximodistal direction and compared these animal model samples to samples of human coronary arteries (CAs) and human internal thoracic arteries (ITAs). METHODS: We compared the histological composition of whole CCAs of sheep (n = 22 animals) with whole porcine CCAs (n = 21), segments of human CAs (n = 21), and human ITAs (n = 21). Using unbiased sampling and stereological methods, we quantified the fractions of elastin, total collagen, type I collagen, type III collagen, smooth muscle actin (SMA) and chondroitin sulfate (CS) A, B, and C. We also quantified the densities and distributions of nuclear profiles, nervi vasorum and vasa vasorum as well as the thickness of the intima-media and total wall thickness. RESULTS: The differences between the paired samples of left and right CCAs in sheep were substantially greater than the differences in laterality in porcine CCAs. The right ovine CCAs had a smaller fraction of elastin (p < 0.001), greater fraction of SMA (p < 0.01), and greater intima-media thickness (p < 0.001) than the paired left side CCAs. In pigs, the right CCAs had a greater fraction of elastin (p < 0.05) and a greater density of vasa vasorum in the media (p < 0.001) than the left-side CCAs. The fractions of elastin and CS decreased and the fraction of SMA increased in the proximodistal direction in both the ovine (p < 0.001) and porcine (p < 0.001) CCAs. Ovine CCAs had a muscular phenotype along their entire length, but porcine CCAs were elastic-type arteries in the proximal segments but muscular type arteries in middle and distal segments. The CCAs of both animals differed from the human CAs and ITAs in most parameters, but the ovine CCAs had a comparable fraction of elastin and CS to human ITAs. CONCLUSIONS: From a histological point of view, ovine and porcine CCAs were not equivalent in most quantitative parameters to human CAs and ITAs. Left and right ovine CCAs did not have the same histological composition, which is limiting for their mutual equivalence as sham-operated controls in experiments. These differences should be taken into account when designing and interpreting experiments using these models in cardiac surgery. The complete morphometric data obtained by quantitative evaluation of arterial segments were provided to facilitate the power analysis necessary for justification of the minimum number of samples when planning further experiments. The middle or distal segments of ovine and porcine CCAs remain the most realistic and the best characterized large animal models for testing artificial arterial CABG conduits.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22010656
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220815142921.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220425s2022 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.aanat.2022.151910 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35189268
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Grajciarová, Martina $u Department of Histology and Embryology and Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Karlovarska 48, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Are ovine and porcine carotid arteries equivalent animal models for experimental cardiac surgery: A quantitative histological comparison / $c M. Grajciarová, D. Turek, A. Malečková, R. Pálek, V. Liška, P. Tomášek, M. Králičková, Z. Tonar
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a common cardiac surgery. Manufacturing small-diameter (2-5 mm) vascular grafts for CABG is important for patients who lack first-choice autologous arterial, or venous conduits. Ovine and porcine common carotid arteries (CCAs) are used as large animal models for in vivo testing of newly developed tissue-engineered arterial grafts. It is unknown to what extent these models are interchangeable and whether the left and right arteries of the same subjects can be used as experimental controls. Therefore, we compared the microscopic structure of paired left and right ovine and porcine CCAs in the proximodistal direction and compared these animal model samples to samples of human coronary arteries (CAs) and human internal thoracic arteries (ITAs). METHODS: We compared the histological composition of whole CCAs of sheep (n = 22 animals) with whole porcine CCAs (n = 21), segments of human CAs (n = 21), and human ITAs (n = 21). Using unbiased sampling and stereological methods, we quantified the fractions of elastin, total collagen, type I collagen, type III collagen, smooth muscle actin (SMA) and chondroitin sulfate (CS) A, B, and C. We also quantified the densities and distributions of nuclear profiles, nervi vasorum and vasa vasorum as well as the thickness of the intima-media and total wall thickness. RESULTS: The differences between the paired samples of left and right CCAs in sheep were substantially greater than the differences in laterality in porcine CCAs. The right ovine CCAs had a smaller fraction of elastin (p < 0.001), greater fraction of SMA (p < 0.01), and greater intima-media thickness (p < 0.001) than the paired left side CCAs. In pigs, the right CCAs had a greater fraction of elastin (p < 0.05) and a greater density of vasa vasorum in the media (p < 0.001) than the left-side CCAs. The fractions of elastin and CS decreased and the fraction of SMA increased in the proximodistal direction in both the ovine (p < 0.001) and porcine (p < 0.001) CCAs. Ovine CCAs had a muscular phenotype along their entire length, but porcine CCAs were elastic-type arteries in the proximal segments but muscular type arteries in middle and distal segments. The CCAs of both animals differed from the human CAs and ITAs in most parameters, but the ovine CCAs had a comparable fraction of elastin and CS to human ITAs. CONCLUSIONS: From a histological point of view, ovine and porcine CCAs were not equivalent in most quantitative parameters to human CAs and ITAs. Left and right ovine CCAs did not have the same histological composition, which is limiting for their mutual equivalence as sham-operated controls in experiments. These differences should be taken into account when designing and interpreting experiments using these models in cardiac surgery. The complete morphometric data obtained by quantitative evaluation of arterial segments were provided to facilitate the power analysis necessary for justification of the minimum number of samples when planning further experiments. The middle or distal segments of ovine and porcine CCAs remain the most realistic and the best characterized large animal models for testing artificial arterial CABG conduits.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a arteriae carotides $x chirurgie $7 D002339
- 650 12
- $a intimomediální šíře tepenné stěny $7 D059168
- 650 _2
- $a koronární bypass $x metody $7 D001026
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a mamární tepny $7 D008323
- 650 _2
- $a modely u zvířat $7 D023421
- 650 _2
- $a ovce $7 D012756
- 650 _2
- $a prasata $7 D013552
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Turek, Daniel $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Katerinska 32, 121 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Malečková, Anna $u Department of Histology and Embryology and Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Karlovarska 48, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pálek, Richard $u Department of Surgery and Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Husova 3, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Liška, Václav $u Department of Surgery and Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Husova 3, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tomášek, Petr $u Department of Histology and Embryology and Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Karlovarska 48, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic; Department of Forensic Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Na Bulovce Hospital, Budinova 2, 180 81 Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0268978
- 700 1_
- $a Králičková, Milena $u Department of Histology and Embryology and Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Karlovarska 48, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tonar, Zbyněk $u Department of Histology and Embryology and Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Karlovarska 48, 301 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic. Electronic address: tonar@lfp.cuni.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000417 $t Annals of anatomy Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft $x 1618-0402 $g Roč. 242, č. - (2022), s. 151910
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35189268 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220425 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220815142919 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1788705 $s 1161854
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 242 $c - $d 151910 $e 20220218 $i 1618-0402 $m Annals of anatomy $n Ann Anat $x MED00000417
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220425