-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Levator ani avulsion: a Systematic evidence review (LASER)
Z. Rusavy, L. Paymova, M. Kozerovsky, A. Veverkova, V. Kalis, RA. Kamel, KM. Ismail
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, systematický přehled
Grantová podpora
Progres Q39
Charles University Research Fund
918119
Charles University Grant Agency
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000787
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
The European Regional Development Fund
PubMed
34245656
DOI
10.1111/1471-0528.16837
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- císařský řez škodlivé účinky statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- onemocnění dna pánevního epidemiologie etiologie MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- vakuová extrakce porodnická škodlivé účinky statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
BACKGROUND: There is variation in the reported incidence rates of levator avulsion (LA) and paucity of research into its risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To explore the incidence rate of LA by mode of birth, imaging modality, timing of diagnosis and laterality of avulsion. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and MIDIRS with no language restriction from inception to April 2019. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: A study was included if LA was assessed by an imaging modality after the first vaginal birth or caesarean section. Case series and reports were not included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: RevMan v5.3 was used for the meta-analyses and SW SAS and STATISTICA packages were used for type and timing of imaging analyses. RESULTS: We included 37 primary non-randomised studies from 17 countries and involving 5594 women. Incidence rates of LA were 1, 15, 21, 38.5 and 52% following caesarean, spontaneous, vacuum, spatula and forceps births, respectively, with no differences by imaging modality. Odds ratio of LA following spontaneous birth versus caesarean section was 10.69. The odds ratios for LA following vacuum and forceps compared with spontaneous birth were 1.66 and 6.32, respectively. LA was more likely to occur unilaterally than bilaterally following spontaneous (P < 0.0001) and vacuum-assisted (P = 0.0103) births but not forceps. Incidence was higher if assessment was performed in the first 4 weeks postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: LA incidence rates following caesarean, spontaneous, vacuum and forceps deliveries were 1, 15, 21 and 52%, respectively. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging were comparable tools for LA diagnosis. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Levator avulsion incidence rates after caesarean, spontaneous, vacuum and forceps deliveries were 1, 15, 21 and 52%, respectively.
Biomedical Centre Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Pilsen Czech Republic
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University Hospital Pilsen Czech Republic
Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Cairo University Cairo Egypt
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22010821
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220506130239.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220425s2022 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/1471-0528.16837 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34245656
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Rusavy, Z $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000171259819
- 245 10
- $a Levator ani avulsion: a Systematic evidence review (LASER) / $c Z. Rusavy, L. Paymova, M. Kozerovsky, A. Veverkova, V. Kalis, RA. Kamel, KM. Ismail
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: There is variation in the reported incidence rates of levator avulsion (LA) and paucity of research into its risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To explore the incidence rate of LA by mode of birth, imaging modality, timing of diagnosis and laterality of avulsion. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and MIDIRS with no language restriction from inception to April 2 $a BACKGROUND There is variation in the reported incidence rates of levator avulsion LA and paucity of research into its risk factors OBJECTIVE To explore the incidence rate of LA by mode of birth imaging modality timing of diagnosis and laterality of avulsion SEARCH STRATEGY We searched MEDLINE EMBASE CINAHL AMED and MIDIRS with no language restriction from inception to April 2019 STUDY EL $a BACKGROUND: There is variation in the reported incidence rates of levator avulsion (LA) and paucity of research into its risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To explore the incidence rate of LA by mode of birth, imaging modality, timing of diagnosis and laterality of avulsion. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and MIDIRS with no language restriction from inception to April 2019. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: A study was included if LA was assessed by an imaging modality after the first vaginal birth or caesarean section. Case series and reports were not included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: RevMan v5.3 was used for the meta-analyses and SW SAS and STATISTICA packages were used for type and timing of imaging analyses. RESULTS: We included 37 primary non-randomised studies from 17 countries and involving 5594 women. Incidence rates of LA were 1, 15, 21, 38.5 and 52% following caesarean, spontaneous, vacuum, spatula and forceps births, respectively, with no differences by imaging modality. Odds ratio of LA following spontaneous birth versus caesarean section was 10.69. The odds ratios for LA following vacuum and forceps compared with spontaneous birth were 1.66 and 6.32, respectively. LA was more likely to occur unilaterally than bilaterally following spontaneous (P < 0.0001) and vacuum-assisted (P = 0.0103) births but not forceps. Incidence was higher if assessment was performed in the first 4 weeks postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: LA incidence rates following caesarean, spontaneous, vacuum and forceps deliveries were 1, 15, 21 and 52%, respectively. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging were comparable tools for LA diagnosis. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Levator avulsion incidence rates after caesarean, spontaneous, vacuum and forceps deliveries were 1, 15, 21 and 52%, respectively.
- 650 _2
- $a císařský řez $x škodlivé účinky $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D002585
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a incidence $7 D015994
- 650 _2
- $a onemocnění dna pánevního $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D059952
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a vakuová extrakce porodnická $x škodlivé účinky $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D014620
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 700 1_
- $a Paymova, L $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kozerovsky, M $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Veverkova, A $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kalis, V $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000170036795 $7 xx0076199
- 700 1_
- $a Kamel, R A $u Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt $1 https://orcid.org/0000000201781086
- 700 1_
- $a Ismail, K M $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000194490706
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005444 $t BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology $x 1471-0528 $g Roč. 129, č. 4 (2022), s. 517-528
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34245656 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220425 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220506130231 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1788779 $s 1162019
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 129 $c 4 $d 517-528 $e 20210801 $i 1471-0528 $m BJOG $n BJOG $x MED00005444
- GRA __
- $a Progres Q39 $p Charles University Research Fund
- GRA __
- $a 918119 $p Charles University Grant Agency
- GRA __
- $a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000787 $p Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
- GRA __
- $p The European Regional Development Fund
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220425
