• Something wrong with this record ?

Mutagenic strategies against luxS gene affect the early stage of biofilm formation of Campylobacter jejuni

M. Teren, E. Shagieva, L. Vondrakova, J. Viktorova, V. Svarcova, K. Demnerova, HT. Michova

. 2022 ; 63 (1) : 145-157. [pub] 20210827

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Currently, it is clear that the luxS gene has an impact on the process of biofilm formation in Campylobacter jejuni. However, even within the species, naturally occurring strains of Campylobacter lacking the luxS gene exist, which can form biofilms. In order to better understand the genetic determinants and the role of quorum sensing through the LuxS/AI-2 pathway in biofilm formation, a set of mutant/complemented strains of C. jejuni 81-176 were prepared. Additionally, the impact of the mutagenic strategy used against the luxS gene was investigated. Biofilm formation was affected by both the presence and absence of the luxS gene, and by the mutagenic strategy used. Analysis by CLSM showed that all mutant strains formed significantly less biofilm mass when compared to the wild-type. Interestingly, the deletion mutant (∆luxS) showed a larger decrease in biofilm mass than the substitution (∙luxS) and insertional inactivated ([Formula: see text]luxS) mutants, even though all the mutant strains lost the ability to produce autoinducer-2 molecules. Moreover, the biofilm of the ∆luxS mutant lacked the characteristic microcolonies observed in all other strains. The complementation of all mutant strains resulted in restored ability to produce AI-2, to form a complex biofilm, and to develop microcolonies at the level of the wild-type.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22011158
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230419114819.0
007      
ta
008      
220425s2022 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s13353-021-00655-y $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34448102
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Teren, Martin $u Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic. terenm@vscht.cz
245    10
$a Mutagenic strategies against luxS gene affect the early stage of biofilm formation of Campylobacter jejuni / $c M. Teren, E. Shagieva, L. Vondrakova, J. Viktorova, V. Svarcova, K. Demnerova, HT. Michova
520    9_
$a Currently, it is clear that the luxS gene has an impact on the process of biofilm formation in Campylobacter jejuni. However, even within the species, naturally occurring strains of Campylobacter lacking the luxS gene exist, which can form biofilms. In order to better understand the genetic determinants and the role of quorum sensing through the LuxS/AI-2 pathway in biofilm formation, a set of mutant/complemented strains of C. jejuni 81-176 were prepared. Additionally, the impact of the mutagenic strategy used against the luxS gene was investigated. Biofilm formation was affected by both the presence and absence of the luxS gene, and by the mutagenic strategy used. Analysis by CLSM showed that all mutant strains formed significantly less biofilm mass when compared to the wild-type. Interestingly, the deletion mutant (∆luxS) showed a larger decrease in biofilm mass than the substitution (∙luxS) and insertional inactivated ([Formula: see text]luxS) mutants, even though all the mutant strains lost the ability to produce autoinducer-2 molecules. Moreover, the biofilm of the ∆luxS mutant lacked the characteristic microcolonies observed in all other strains. The complementation of all mutant strains resulted in restored ability to produce AI-2, to form a complex biofilm, and to develop microcolonies at the level of the wild-type.
650    _2
$a bakteriální proteiny $x genetika $7 D001426
650    _2
$a biofilmy $7 D018441
650    12
$a Campylobacter jejuni $x genetika $7 D016123
650    _2
$a lyasy štěpící vazby C-S $x genetika $7 D013437
650    _2
$a mutageny $7 D009153
650    _2
$a quorum sensing $x genetika $7 D053038
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Shagieva, Ekaterina $u Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0300180
700    1_
$a Vondrakova, Lucie $u Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Viktorova, Jitka $u Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Svarcova, Viviana $u Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Demnerova, Katerina $u Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Michova, Hana $u Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0300362
773    0_
$w MED00002521 $t Journal of applied genetics $x 2190-3883 $g Roč. 63, č. 1 (2022), s. 145-157
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34448102 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220425 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230419114815 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1788980 $s 1162356
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 63 $c 1 $d 145-157 $e 20210827 $i 2190-3883 $m Journal of Applied Genetics $n J Appl Genet $x MED00002521
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220425

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...