• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Classification and standardized reporting of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) Consensus Statements

S. Choong, J. DE LA Rosette, J. Denstedt, G. Zeng, K. Sarica, G. Mazzon, I. Saltirov, SK. Pal, M. Agrawal, J. Desai, A. Petrik, N. Buchholz, MV. Maroclo, S. Gordon, A. Sridhar

. 2022 ; 74 (1) : 110-118. [pub] 20210113

Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22011195

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to reach a consensus in the classification and standardized reporting for the different types of PCNLs. METHODS: The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology was used to reach a consensus. Thirty-two statements were formulated reviewing the literature on guidelines and consensus on PCNLs, and included procedure specific details, outcome measurements and a classification for PCNLs. Experts were invited to two rounds of input, the first enabled independent modifications of the proposed statements and provided the option to add statements. The second round facilitated scoring of all statements. Each statement was discussed in the third round to decide which statements to include. Any suggestion or disagreement was debated and discussed to reach a consensual agreement. RESULTS: Twenty-five recommendations were identified to provide standardized reporting of procedure and outcomes. Consensual scoring above 80% were strongly agreed upon by the panel. The top treatment related outcomes were size of sheath used (99.1%) and position for PCNL (93.5%). The highest ranked Outcome Measures included definition of postoperative hospital length of stay (94.4%) and estimated blood loss (93.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The consensus statements will be useful to clarify operative technique, in the design of clinical trials and standardized reporting, and presentation of results to compare outcomes of different types of PCNLs.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22011195
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220506131530.0
007      
ta
008      
220425s2022 it f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.04107-7 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33439573
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a it
100    1_
$a Choong, Simon $u Institute of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
245    10
$a Classification and standardized reporting of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) Consensus Statements / $c S. Choong, J. DE LA Rosette, J. Denstedt, G. Zeng, K. Sarica, G. Mazzon, I. Saltirov, SK. Pal, M. Agrawal, J. Desai, A. Petrik, N. Buchholz, MV. Maroclo, S. Gordon, A. Sridhar
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to reach a consensus in the classification and standardized reporting for the different types of PCNLs. METHODS: The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology was used to reach a consensus. Thirty-two statements were formulated reviewing the literature on guidelines and consensus on PCNLs, and included procedure specific details, outcome measurements and a classification for PCNLs. Experts were invited to two rounds of input, the first enabled independent modifications of the proposed statements and provided the option to add statements. The second round facilitated scoring of all statements. Each statement was discussed in the third round to decide which statements to include. Any suggestion or disagreement was debated and discussed to reach a consensual agreement. RESULTS: Twenty-five recommendations were identified to provide standardized reporting of procedure and outcomes. Consensual scoring above 80% were strongly agreed upon by the panel. The top treatment related outcomes were size of sheath used (99.1%) and position for PCNL (93.5%). The highest ranked Outcome Measures included definition of postoperative hospital length of stay (94.4%) and estimated blood loss (93.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The consensus statements will be useful to clarify operative technique, in the design of clinical trials and standardized reporting, and presentation of results to compare outcomes of different types of PCNLs.
650    _2
$a konsensus $7 D032921
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a perkutánní nefrolitotomie $x metody $7 D000074642
650    _2
$a hodnocení výsledků zdravotní péče $7 D017063
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    12
$a urolitiáza $x chirurgie $7 D052878
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a DE LA Rosette, Jean $u Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Denstedt, John $u Division of Urology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
700    1_
$a Zeng, Guohua $u Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
700    1_
$a Sarica, Kemal $u School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Biruni University, Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Mazzon, Giorgio $u Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Bassano del Grappa, Vicenza, Italy - giorgiomazzon83@gmail.com
700    1_
$a Saltirov, Iliya $u Department of Urology and Nephrology, Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria
700    1_
$a Pal, Shashi K $u Department of Urology, Apollo Group of Hospitals and Holy Family Hospital, New Delhi, India
700    1_
$a Agrawal, Madhu $u Department of Urology, Center for Minimally-Invasive Endourology, Global Rainbow Healthcare, Agra, India
700    1_
$a Desai, Janak $u Department of Urology, Samved Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
700    1_
$a Petrik, Aleš $u Department of Urology, Region Hospital Ceske Budejovice, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Buchholz, Noor $u Department of Urology, Sobeh's Vascular and Medical Center, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
700    1_
$a Maroclo, Marcus V $u Unit of Endourology, Hospital de Base of the Federal District, Brasília, Brazil
700    1_
$a Gordon, Stephen $u Department of Urology, Epsom and St. Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Surrey, UK
700    1_
$a Sridhar, Ashwin $u Institute of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
773    0_
$w MED00208300 $t Minerva urology and nephrology $x 2724-6442 $g Roč. 74, č. 1 (2022), s. 110-118
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33439573 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220425 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220506131522 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1789013 $s 1162393
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 74 $c 1 $d 110-118 $e 20210113 $i 2724-6442 $m Minerva urology and nephrology $n Minerva Urol Nephrol $x MED00208300
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220425

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace