-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparison of 12-cm versus 6-cm long peripheral catheters in patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA)
K. Pavelkova, K. Lisova, P. Blahova, D. Mokra, O. Hloch, J. Charvat
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Administration, Intravenous MeSH
- Catheters MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Catheterization, Peripheral * adverse effects MeSH
- Punctures MeSH
- Ultrasonography MeSH
- Catheters, Indwelling MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: Long peripheral catheter is 6-15 cm long vascular device. The aim of the study was to compare the frequency of complications of two types of long peripheral catheters with different length inserted in DIVA patients. METHODS: Under ultrasound navigation 2.7F 6.4 cm or 4Fr 12 cm long peripheral catheter was inserted. Complications of both long peripheral catheters were prospectively observed and their relationship to the patient's age, gender, selected vein, number of punctures and Barthel score system was evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-three 12 cm and fifty-five 6.4 cm long peripheral catheters were inserted. Median of dwelling time was 8 days for 6.4 cm and 9 days for 12 cm long peripheral catheter. There were 17 (26%) complications in 6.4 cm (38/1000 catheter days) and 15 (16%) in 12 cm catheter (17/1000 catheter days), p = 0.04. The complications of both peripheral catheters were not associated with the age of patients, gender, number of punctures and selected vein for insertion. Unlike 12 cm catheter, the complications of 6.4 cm long peripheral catheter were significantly associated with the result of Barthel scoring system (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The frequency of complications was more common with 6,4 cm than with 12 cm catheter.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22011527
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220713142634.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220425s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/1129729820983151 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33349111
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Pavelková, Kateřina, $u Medical Department of 2nd Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Faculty Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1975- $7 xx0274730
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of 12-cm versus 6-cm long peripheral catheters in patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) / $c K. Pavelkova, K. Lisova, P. Blahova, D. Mokra, O. Hloch, J. Charvat
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Long peripheral catheter is 6-15 cm long vascular device. The aim of the study was to compare the frequency of complications of two types of long peripheral catheters with different length inserted in DIVA patients. METHODS: Under ultrasound navigation 2.7F 6.4 cm or 4Fr 12 cm long peripheral catheter was inserted. Complications of both long peripheral catheters were prospectively observed and their relationship to the patient's age, gender, selected vein, number of punctures and Barthel score system was evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-three 12 cm and fifty-five 6.4 cm long peripheral catheters were inserted. Median of dwelling time was 8 days for 6.4 cm and 9 days for 12 cm long peripheral catheter. There were 17 (26%) complications in 6.4 cm (38/1000 catheter days) and 15 (16%) in 12 cm catheter (17/1000 catheter days), p = 0.04. The complications of both peripheral catheters were not associated with the age of patients, gender, number of punctures and selected vein for insertion. Unlike 12 cm catheter, the complications of 6.4 cm long peripheral catheter were significantly associated with the result of Barthel scoring system (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The frequency of complications was more common with 6,4 cm than with 12 cm catheter.
- 650 _2
- $a intravenózní podání $7 D061605
- 650 12
- $a periferní katetrizace $x škodlivé účinky $7 D002406
- 650 _2
- $a katétry $7 D057785
- 650 _2
- $a zaváděcí katétry $7 D002408
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a punkce $7 D011677
- 650 _2
- $a ultrasonografie $7 D014463
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Lisova, Katerina $u Medical Department of 2nd Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Faculty Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Blahova, Petra $u Medical Department of 2nd Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Faculty Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Mokra, Dana $u Medical Department of 2nd Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Faculty Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hloch, Ondrej $u Medical Department of 2nd Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Faculty Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Charvat, Jiri $u Medical Department of 2nd Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Faculty Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000197346638
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181745 $t The journal of vascular access $x 1724-6032 $g Roč. 23, č. 1 (2022), s. 94-97
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33349111 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220425 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220713142629 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1789236 $s 1162725
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 23 $c 1 $d 94-97 $e 20201221 $i 1724-6032 $m The journal of vascular access $n J Vasc Access $x MED00181745
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220425