• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for perioperative care and use of GRADE: a systematic review protocol

L. Kantorová, J. Kantor, J. Búřil, P. Búřilová, S. Slezáková, T. Nečas, M. Klugar

. 2021 ; 11 (12) : e052795. [pub] 20211214

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22011695

INTRODUCTION: Perioperative care is a broad field covering an array of elective and emergency procedures. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for perioperative care exist with various degrees of methodological quality. We intend to critically appraise them using AGREE II instrument and investigate the use of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PROSPERO and did not identify any similar systematic review in this area. We will search databases, repositories and websites of guideline developers and medical societies, including MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), DynaMed, the GIN international guideline library and registry of guidelines in development, BIGG international database of GRADE guidelines, ECRI Guideline Trust or National Institute for Clinical Evidence to identify all CPGs for perioperative care in an adult population in a general clinical setting. We will include CPGs, expert guidance, position papers, guidance documents and consensus statements published in the last 5 years by experts or international organisations that provide guidance or recommendations in the available full text with no geographical or language limitation. Excluded will be those containing only good practice statements. Two independent reviewers will perform critical appraisal using the AGREE II tool. The data presented in a narrative and tabular form will include the results of the critical appraisal for all identified CPGs for all AGREE II domains and an assessment of the use of the GRADE approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. We will disseminate the findings through professional networks and conference presentations and will publish the results.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22011695
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220506131234.0
007      
ta
008      
220425s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052795 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34907061
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Kantorová, Lucia $u Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic lucia.kantorova@mail.muni.cz $u Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000319901290
245    10
$a Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for perioperative care and use of GRADE: a systematic review protocol / $c L. Kantorová, J. Kantor, J. Búřil, P. Búřilová, S. Slezáková, T. Nečas, M. Klugar
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Perioperative care is a broad field covering an array of elective and emergency procedures. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for perioperative care exist with various degrees of methodological quality. We intend to critically appraise them using AGREE II instrument and investigate the use of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PROSPERO and did not identify any similar systematic review in this area. We will search databases, repositories and websites of guideline developers and medical societies, including MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), DynaMed, the GIN international guideline library and registry of guidelines in development, BIGG international database of GRADE guidelines, ECRI Guideline Trust or National Institute for Clinical Evidence to identify all CPGs for perioperative care in an adult population in a general clinical setting. We will include CPGs, expert guidance, position papers, guidance documents and consensus statements published in the last 5 years by experts or international organisations that provide guidance or recommendations in the available full text with no geographical or language limitation. Excluded will be those containing only good practice statements. Two independent reviewers will perform critical appraisal using the AGREE II tool. The data presented in a narrative and tabular form will include the results of the critical appraisal for all identified CPGs for all AGREE II domains and an assessment of the use of the GRADE approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. We will disseminate the findings through professional networks and conference presentations and will publish the results.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a konsensus $7 D032921
650    _2
$a databáze faktografické $7 D016208
650    12
$a systém GRADE $7 D000077002
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a perioperační péče $7 D019990
650    _2
$a systematický přehled jako téma $7 D000078202
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kantor, Jiří $u Institute of Special Educational Studies, Faculty of Education, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Center of Evidence-Based Education & Arts Therapies: A JBI Affiliated Group, Faculty of Education, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000160163408 $7 mzk2009521593
700    1_
$a Búřil, Jiří $u Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Ist Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000284928994
700    1_
$a Búřilová, Petra $u Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Slezáková, Simona $u Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Nečas, Tomáš $u Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department od Pediatrics, Tomas Bata Regional Hospital, Zlín, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Klugar, Miloslav $u Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000228047295 $7 mzk2015879957
773    0_
$w MED00184484 $t BMJ open $x 2044-6055 $g Roč. 11, č. 12 (2021), s. e052795
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34907061 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220425 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220506131226 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1789339 $s 1162893
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 11 $c 12 $d e052795 $e 20211214 $i 2044-6055 $m BMJ open $n BMJ Open $x MED00184484
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220425

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace