-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Alpha-diversity and microbial community structure of the male urinary microbiota depend on urine sampling method
J. Hrbacek, D. Morais, P. Cermak, V. Hanacek, R. Zachoval
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
Nature Open Access
od 2011-12-01
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
ProQuest Central
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
- MeSH
- analýza moči MeSH
- biodiverzita * MeSH
- komorbidita MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metagenomika metody MeSH
- mikrobiota * MeSH
- močové ústrojí mikrobiologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Considerable variation exists in the methodology of urinary microbiota studies published so far including the cornerstone of any biomedical analysis: sample collection. The aim of this study was to compare the urinary microbiota of first-catch voided urine (FCU), mid-stream voided urine (MSU) and aseptically catheterised urine in men and define the most suitable urine sampling method. Forty-nine men (mean age 71.3 years) undergoing endoscopic urological procedures were enrolled in the study. Each of them contributed three samples: first-catch urine (FCU), mid-stream urine (MSU) and a catheterised urine sample. The samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS, n = 35) and expanded quantitative urine culture (EQUC, n = 31). Using NGS, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria were the most abundant phyla in our population. The most abundant genera (in order of relative abundance) included: Prevotella, Veillonella, Streptococcus, Porphyromonas, Campylobacter, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Ezakiella, Escherichia and Dialister. Eighty-two of 105 samples were dominated by a single genus. FCU, MSU and catheterised urine samples differed significantly in three of five alpha-diversity measures (ANOVA, p < 0.05): estimated number of operational taxonomic units, Chao1 and abundance-based coverage estimators. Beta-diversity comparisons using the PIME method (Prevalence Interval for Microbiome Evaluation) resulted in clustering of urine samples according to the mode of sampling. EQUC detected cultivable bacteria in 30/31 (97%) FCU and 27/31 (87%) MSU samples. Only 4/31 (13%) of catheterised urine samples showed bacterial growth. Urine samples obtained by transurethral catheterisation under aseptic conditions seem to differ from spontaneously voided urine samples. Whether the added value of a more exact reflection of the bladder microbiota free from urethral contamination outweighs the invasiveness of urethral catheterisation remains to be determined.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22011727
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220506131130.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220425s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41598-021-03292-x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34887510
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Hrbacek, Jan $u Department of Urology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, 14059, Prague, Czech Republic. honzahrbacek@gmail.com
- 245 10
- $a Alpha-diversity and microbial community structure of the male urinary microbiota depend on urine sampling method / $c J. Hrbacek, D. Morais, P. Cermak, V. Hanacek, R. Zachoval
- 520 9_
- $a Considerable variation exists in the methodology of urinary microbiota studies published so far including the cornerstone of any biomedical analysis: sample collection. The aim of this study was to compare the urinary microbiota of first-catch voided urine (FCU), mid-stream voided urine (MSU) and aseptically catheterised urine in men and define the most suitable urine sampling method. Forty-nine men (mean age 71.3 years) undergoing endoscopic urological procedures were enrolled in the study. Each of them contributed three samples: first-catch urine (FCU), mid-stream urine (MSU) and a catheterised urine sample. The samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS, n = 35) and expanded quantitative urine culture (EQUC, n = 31). Using NGS, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria were the most abundant phyla in our population. The most abundant genera (in order of relative abundance) included: Prevotella, Veillonella, Streptococcus, Porphyromonas, Campylobacter, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Ezakiella, Escherichia and Dialister. Eighty-two of 105 samples were dominated by a single genus. FCU, MSU and catheterised urine samples differed significantly in three of five alpha-diversity measures (ANOVA, p < 0.05): estimated number of operational taxonomic units, Chao1 and abundance-based coverage estimators. Beta-diversity comparisons using the PIME method (Prevalence Interval for Microbiome Evaluation) resulted in clustering of urine samples according to the mode of sampling. EQUC detected cultivable bacteria in 30/31 (97%) FCU and 27/31 (87%) MSU samples. Only 4/31 (13%) of catheterised urine samples showed bacterial growth. Urine samples obtained by transurethral catheterisation under aseptic conditions seem to differ from spontaneously voided urine samples. Whether the added value of a more exact reflection of the bladder microbiota free from urethral contamination outweighs the invasiveness of urethral catheterisation remains to be determined.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 12
- $a biodiverzita $7 D044822
- 650 _2
- $a komorbidita $7 D015897
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a metagenomika $x metody $7 D056186
- 650 12
- $a mikrobiota $7 D064307
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a analýza moči $7 D016482
- 650 _2
- $a močové ústrojí $x mikrobiologie $7 D014551
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Morais, Daniel $u Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, 14200, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Cermak, Pavel $u Department of Clinical Microbiology, Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, 14059, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hanacek, Vitezslav $u Department of Urology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, 14059, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Zachoval, Roman $u Department of Urology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, 14059, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 11, č. 1 (2021), s. 23758
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34887510 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220425 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220506131122 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1789360 $s 1162925
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 11 $c 1 $d 23758 $e 20211209 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220425