• Something wrong with this record ?

Contemporary analysis of the effect of marital status on survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy: A population-based study

CC. Ruvolo, L. Nocera, FL. Stolzenbach, M. Wenzel, C. Würnschimmel, F. Fusco, A. Palmieri, Z. Tian, SF. Shariat, F. Saad, A. Briganti, C. Imbimbo, V. Mirone, PI. Karakiewicz

. 2021 ; 39 (11) : 789.e9-789.e17. [pub] 20210604

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22012051

PURPOSE: Unmarried status is an established risk factor for worse cancer control outcomes in various malignancies. Moreover, several investigators observed worse outcomes in unmarried males, but not in females. This concept has not been tested in upper tract urothelial carcinoma and represents the topic of the study. METHODS: Within Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2004-2016), we identified 8833 non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (5208 males vs. 3625 females). Kaplan Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models predicting overall mortality, other-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality were used. RESULTS: Overall, 1323 males (25.4%) and 1986 females (54.8%) were unmarried. Except for lower rates of chemotherapy in unmarried males (15.6 vs. 19.6%, P = 0.001) and unmarried females (13.8 vs. 23.6%, P < 0.001), no clinically meaningful differences were recorded between males and females. In multivariable Cox regression models, unmarried status was an independent predictor of higher overall mortality in both males (Hazard ratio [HR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-1.48, P < 0.001) and females (HR: 1.13, 95%CI: 1.00-1.27, P = 0.04), as well as of higher other-cause mortality in both males (HR: 1.53, 95%CI: 1.26-1.84,P < 0.001) and females (HR: 1.43, 95%CI: 1.15-1.78,P < 0.01). However, higher cancer-specific mortality was only recorded in unmarried males (HR: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.08-1.42, P < 0.01), but not in females (HR: 1.02, 95%CI: 0.89-1.17, P = 0.7). CONCLUSION: Unmarried status is a marker of worse survival in both males and females and should be flagged as an important risk factor at diagnosis, in both sexes. In consequence, unmarried patients represent candidate for interventions aimed at decreasing the survival gap relative to married counterparts.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22012051
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220506130438.0
007      
ta
008      
220425s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.040 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34092481
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Ruvolo, Claudia Collà $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. Electronic address: c.collaruvolo@gmail.com
245    10
$a Contemporary analysis of the effect of marital status on survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy: A population-based study / $c CC. Ruvolo, L. Nocera, FL. Stolzenbach, M. Wenzel, C. Würnschimmel, F. Fusco, A. Palmieri, Z. Tian, SF. Shariat, F. Saad, A. Briganti, C. Imbimbo, V. Mirone, PI. Karakiewicz
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Unmarried status is an established risk factor for worse cancer control outcomes in various malignancies. Moreover, several investigators observed worse outcomes in unmarried males, but not in females. This concept has not been tested in upper tract urothelial carcinoma and represents the topic of the study. METHODS: Within Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2004-2016), we identified 8833 non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (5208 males vs. 3625 females). Kaplan Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models predicting overall mortality, other-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality were used. RESULTS: Overall, 1323 males (25.4%) and 1986 females (54.8%) were unmarried. Except for lower rates of chemotherapy in unmarried males (15.6 vs. 19.6%, P = 0.001) and unmarried females (13.8 vs. 23.6%, P < 0.001), no clinically meaningful differences were recorded between males and females. In multivariable Cox regression models, unmarried status was an independent predictor of higher overall mortality in both males (Hazard ratio [HR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-1.48, P < 0.001) and females (HR: 1.13, 95%CI: 1.00-1.27, P = 0.04), as well as of higher other-cause mortality in both males (HR: 1.53, 95%CI: 1.26-1.84,P < 0.001) and females (HR: 1.43, 95%CI: 1.15-1.78,P < 0.01). However, higher cancer-specific mortality was only recorded in unmarried males (HR: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.08-1.42, P < 0.01), but not in females (HR: 1.02, 95%CI: 0.89-1.17, P = 0.7). CONCLUSION: Unmarried status is a marker of worse survival in both males and females and should be flagged as an important risk factor at diagnosis, in both sexes. In consequence, unmarried patients represent candidate for interventions aimed at decreasing the survival gap relative to married counterparts.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a databáze faktografické $x normy $7 D016208
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a manželský stav $7 D017533
650    _2
$a nefroureterektomie $x metody $7 D000074682
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a program SEER $x normy $7 D018426
650    _2
$a analýza přežití $7 D016019
650    _2
$a nádory močového měchýře $x mortalita $x chirurgie $7 D001749
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Nocera, Luigi $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IBCAS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Stolzenbach, Franziska L $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Wenzel, Mike $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
700    1_
$a Würnschimmel, Christoph $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Fusco, Ferdinando $u Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
700    1_
$a Palmieri, Alessandro $u Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
700    1_
$a Tian, Zhe $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
700    1_
$a Saad, Fred $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
700    1_
$a Briganti, Alberto $u Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IBCAS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Imbimbo, Ciro $u Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
700    1_
$a Mirone, Vincenzo $u Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
700    1_
$a Karakiewicz, Pierre I $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
773    0_
$w MED00008671 $t Urologic oncology $x 1873-2496 $g Roč. 39, č. 11 (2021), s. 789.e9-789.e17
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34092481 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220425 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220506130430 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1789584 $s 1163252
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 39 $c 11 $d 789.e9-789.e17 $e 20210604 $i 1873-2496 $m Urologic oncology $n Urol Oncol $x MED00008671
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220425

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options