-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Short-term Outcomes of Water Vapor Therapy (Rezūm) for BPH/LUTS in the First Czech Cohort
R. Wasserbauer, D. Pacik, G. Varga, V. Vit, J. Jarkovsky, M. Fedorko
Jazyk angličtina Země Írán
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2004
Free Medical Journals
od 2004
ProQuest Central
od 2010-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2009-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2003
PubMed
34549803
DOI
10.22037/uj.v18i.6843
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- hyperplazie prostaty * komplikace MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pára MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- symptomy dolních močových cest * etiologie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term results of water vapor therapy (Rezūm) for BPH/LUTS in the first cohort of Czech patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with BPH and moderate to severe LUTS (N = 76) who underwent Rezūm treatment from December 2019 to July 2020 were included in the prospective study. Prior to the procedure, they completed the IPSS and OABv8 questionnaires and underwent uroflowmetry, transrectal ultrasound of the prostate, and PSA sampling. The parameters before and 3 months after the procedure were compared and statistically evaluated. RESULTS: The study protocol was completed by 92% of patients (N = 70). We observed a significant increase in Qmax (median 17.7 vs. 8.8 mL/s, P < .001), Qave (9 vs. 4.5 mL/s, P = .001) and voided volume (241 vs. 171 mL, P < .001) and a significant reduction in post-void residual (average 17.5 vs. 67.7 mL), prostate volume (39.3 vs. 62.3 mL) and total PSA (median 1.9 vs. 2.5 ng/mL, resp. P values < .001). There was also a significant decrease in OABv8 score (average 7.6 vs. 16.6, P < .001) and IPSS QoL (1.6 vs. 4.0, P = .037). The improvement in the IPSS score was apparent, yet statistically insignificant (6.8 vs. 16, P = .079). CONCLUSION: Water vapor therapy is an effective and safe method of BPH/LUTS treatment in the short-term.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22012204
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220506130954.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220425s2021 ir f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.22037/uj.v18i.6843 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34549803
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ir
- 100 1_
- $a Wasserbauer, Roman $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic. wasserbauer.roman@fnbrno.cz
- 245 10
- $a Short-term Outcomes of Water Vapor Therapy (Rezūm) for BPH/LUTS in the First Czech Cohort / $c R. Wasserbauer, D. Pacik, G. Varga, V. Vit, J. Jarkovsky, M. Fedorko
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term results of water vapor therapy (Rezūm) for BPH/LUTS in the first cohort of Czech patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with BPH and moderate to severe LUTS (N = 76) who underwent Rezūm treatment from December 2019 to July 2020 were included in the prospective study. Prior to the procedure, they completed the IPSS and OABv8 questionnaires and underwent uroflowmetry, transrectal ultrasound of the prostate, and PSA sampling. The parameters before and 3 months after the procedure were compared and statistically evaluated. RESULTS: The study protocol was completed by 92% of patients (N = 70). We observed a significant increase in Qmax (median 17.7 vs. 8.8 mL/s, P < .001), Qave (9 vs. 4.5 mL/s, P = .001) and voided volume (241 vs. 171 mL, P < .001) and a significant reduction in post-void residual (average 17.5 vs. 67.7 mL), prostate volume (39.3 vs. 62.3 mL) and total PSA (median 1.9 vs. 2.5 ng/mL, resp. P values < .001). There was also a significant decrease in OABv8 score (average 7.6 vs. 16.6, P < .001) and IPSS QoL (1.6 vs. 4.0, P = .037). The improvement in the IPSS score was apparent, yet statistically insignificant (6.8 vs. 16, P = .079). CONCLUSION: Water vapor therapy is an effective and safe method of BPH/LUTS treatment in the short-term.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a symptomy dolních močových cest $x etiologie $7 D059411
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 12
- $a hyperplazie prostaty $x komplikace $7 D011470
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 _2
- $a pára $7 D013227
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Pacik, Dalibor $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic. dalibor.pacik@gmail.com
- 700 1_
- $a Varga, Gabriel $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic. varga.gabriel@fnbrno.cz
- 700 1_
- $a Vit, Vitezslav $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic. vit.vitezslav@fnbrno.cz
- 700 1_
- $a Jarkovsky, Jiri $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 3, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic . jaro@sci.muni.cz
- 700 1_
- $a Fedorko, Michal $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic. fedorko.michal@fnbrno.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00177143 $t Urology journal $x 1735-546X $g Roč. 18, č. 6 (2021), s. 699-702
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34549803 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220425 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220506130946 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1789692 $s 1163405
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 18 $c 6 $d 699-702 $e 20210920 $i 1735-546X $m Urology journal $n Urol J $x MED00177143
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220425