-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Speech Perception and Production in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Pendred Syndrome
J. Skrivan, M. Jurovcik, Z. Aksenovova, J. Astl, RK. Pourova, P. Dytrych, T. Sieger
Jazyk angličtina Země Turecko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2021
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2012
Open Access Digital Library
od 2002-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- kochleární implantáty normy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- nedoslýchavost etiologie chirurgie MeSH
- percepce řeči fyziologie MeSH
- percepční nedoslýchavost komplikace psychologie chirurgie MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- uzlová struma komplikace psychologie chirurgie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
AIMS: Patients with the Pendred syndrome suffer very often from a hearing loss. They may be good candidates for a cochlear implantation, but unfortunately, due to the fluctuating character of the hearing loss, they may escape such indication. In the study, we compared speech production and speech acquisition in 2 groups of implanted patients: those with the Pendred syndrome, and standard non-syndromic patients. METHODS: Ten patients with Pendred syndrome were analyzed for speech perception and production. The control group consisted of 41 non-syndromic implanted patients. All implantees were scored according to speech perception, speech production, and the sum of both. The data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found in language acquisition and production in implantees with Pendred syndrome when compared to non-syndromic patients with cochlear implants. Nor there was any difference in speech production and acquisition between the 2 compared groups regarding surgical age, time elapsed after surgery, or age during the testing. CONCLUSION: In this study evaluating language and speech production and acquisition, patients with Pendred syndrome who underwent cochlear implants show comparable results to their implanted peers with deafness of a different etiology.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22012357
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220506130955.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220425s2021 tu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5152/balkanmedj.2021.20182 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34274914
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a tu
- 100 1_
- $a Skrivan, Jiri $u Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 245 10
- $a Speech Perception and Production in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Pendred Syndrome / $c J. Skrivan, M. Jurovcik, Z. Aksenovova, J. Astl, RK. Pourova, P. Dytrych, T. Sieger
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: Patients with the Pendred syndrome suffer very often from a hearing loss. They may be good candidates for a cochlear implantation, but unfortunately, due to the fluctuating character of the hearing loss, they may escape such indication. In the study, we compared speech production and speech acquisition in 2 groups of implanted patients: those with the Pendred syndrome, and standard non-syndromic patients. METHODS: Ten patients with Pendred syndrome were analyzed for speech perception and production. The control group consisted of 41 non-syndromic implanted patients. All implantees were scored according to speech perception, speech production, and the sum of both. The data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found in language acquisition and production in implantees with Pendred syndrome when compared to non-syndromic patients with cochlear implants. Nor there was any difference in speech production and acquisition between the 2 compared groups regarding surgical age, time elapsed after surgery, or age during the testing. CONCLUSION: In this study evaluating language and speech production and acquisition, patients with Pendred syndrome who underwent cochlear implants show comparable results to their implanted peers with deafness of a different etiology.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
- 650 _2
- $a kochleární implantáty $x normy $7 D003054
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a uzlová struma $x komplikace $x psychologie $x chirurgie $7 D006044
- 650 _2
- $a nedoslýchavost $x etiologie $x chirurgie $7 D034381
- 650 _2
- $a percepční nedoslýchavost $x komplikace $x psychologie $x chirurgie $7 D006319
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a percepce řeči $x fyziologie $7 D013067
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Jurovcik, Michal $u Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Aksenovova, Zdenka $u Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Astl, Jaromír $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Pourova, Radka Kremlikova $u Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Dytrych, Petra $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Sieger, Tomas $u Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00177196 $t Balkan medical journal $x 2146-3131 $g Roč. 38, č. 4 (2021), s. 244-248
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34274914 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220425 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220506130947 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1789795 $s 1163558
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 38 $c 4 $d 244-248 $e - $i 2146-3131 $m Balkan medical journal $n Balkan Med J $x MED00177196
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220425