Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Differential impact of radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy on recurrence patterns: an assessment using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT(MRI)

B. Grubmüller, V. Jahrreiss, N. Huebner, M. Mitterhauser, J. Stangl-Kremser, KH. Grubmüller, P. Baltzer, M. Hacker, G. Goldner, SF. Shariat, S. Rasul

. 2021 ; 24 (2) : 439-447. [pub] 20200929

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22012435

E-zdroje NLK Online Plný text

ProQuest Central od 2000-07-01 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library od 1997-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2000-07-01 do Před 1 rokem
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 2000-07-01 do Před 1 rokem

PURPOSE: To evaluate the differential impact of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) on recurrence patterns in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) using [68Ga]Ga-PSMAHBED-CC conjugate 11 positron emission tomography (PSMA 11-PET). METHODS: We assessed 162 consecutive patients who experienced biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP for nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PC). All had at least one positive lesion on imaging. No patient was on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Patients were categorized into those who had received adjuvant/salvage RT ± ADT and those who did not (RP only). Lesion- and patient-based analyses were performed. The impact of the radiation field was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 57 BCR patients underwent RP only, 105 received postoperative RT. Median PSA was 1.01 ng/ml (IQR 0.58-2). In the lesion-based analysis, compared to the RP only patients, those who had received postoperative RT, had less lymph node (LN) recurrences distal to the common iliac bifurcation (35.2 vs. 57.9%, p = 0.05), but were more likely to harbor positive LNs proximal to the iliac bifurcation and in the presacral (34.2 vs. 12.3%, p = 0.002) areas as well as bone metastases (25.7 vs. 8.8%, p = 0.01). In the patient-based analysis, the patients with postoperative RT after RP had less recurrence in the pelvis only (pelvic LNs and/or prostate bed) (52.4 vs. 79%, p = 0.002), but were more likely to harbor extrapelvic recurrence (41.9 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.001). Patients who received RT to the prostate bed only had more recurrence to the pelvic LN only (54.2% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.002), but less extrapelvic recurrence (31.3 vs. 53.2%, p = 0.03) and less bone recurrence (16.7 vs. 36.2%, p = 0.031) compared to those patients, who received RT to the prostate bed and pelvic nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative radiation treatment alters the recurrence pattern in BCR patients after RP. Further prospective studies are needed to establish a decision tree for optimal imaging/management according to previous treatments.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22012435
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220506130409.0
007      
ta
008      
220425s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/s41391-020-00294-0 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32994534
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Grubmüller, Bernhard $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Workinggroup of Diagnostic Imaging in Urology, Austrian Society of Urology, Vienna, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000287461488
245    10
$a Differential impact of radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy on recurrence patterns: an assessment using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT(MRI) / $c B. Grubmüller, V. Jahrreiss, N. Huebner, M. Mitterhauser, J. Stangl-Kremser, KH. Grubmüller, P. Baltzer, M. Hacker, G. Goldner, SF. Shariat, S. Rasul
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: To evaluate the differential impact of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) on recurrence patterns in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) using [68Ga]Ga-PSMAHBED-CC conjugate 11 positron emission tomography (PSMA 11-PET). METHODS: We assessed 162 consecutive patients who experienced biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP for nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PC). All had at least one positive lesion on imaging. No patient was on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Patients were categorized into those who had received adjuvant/salvage RT ± ADT and those who did not (RP only). Lesion- and patient-based analyses were performed. The impact of the radiation field was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 57 BCR patients underwent RP only, 105 received postoperative RT. Median PSA was 1.01 ng/ml (IQR 0.58-2). In the lesion-based analysis, compared to the RP only patients, those who had received postoperative RT, had less lymph node (LN) recurrences distal to the common iliac bifurcation (35.2 vs. 57.9%, p = 0.05), but were more likely to harbor positive LNs proximal to the iliac bifurcation and in the presacral (34.2 vs. 12.3%, p = 0.002) areas as well as bone metastases (25.7 vs. 8.8%, p = 0.01). In the patient-based analysis, the patients with postoperative RT after RP had less recurrence in the pelvis only (pelvic LNs and/or prostate bed) (52.4 vs. 79%, p = 0.002), but were more likely to harbor extrapelvic recurrence (41.9 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.001). Patients who received RT to the prostate bed only had more recurrence to the pelvic LN only (54.2% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.002), but less extrapelvic recurrence (31.3 vs. 53.2%, p = 0.03) and less bone recurrence (16.7 vs. 36.2%, p = 0.031) compared to those patients, who received RT to the prostate bed and pelvic nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative radiation treatment alters the recurrence pattern in BCR patients after RP. Further prospective studies are needed to establish a decision tree for optimal imaging/management according to previous treatments.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a kombinovaná terapie $7 D003131
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a izotopy gallia $x metabolismus $7 D005709
650    _2
$a radioizotopy galia $x metabolismus $7 D005710
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $x diagnóza $x diagnostické zobrazování $x epidemiologie $x metabolismus $7 D009364
650    _2
$a PET/CT $x metody $7 D000072078
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a prostatektomie $x metody $7 D011468
650    _2
$a nádory prostaty $x patologie $x radioterapie $x chirurgie $7 D011471
650    _2
$a radiofarmaka $x metabolismus $7 D019275
650    _2
$a radioterapie $x metody $7 D011878
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
651    _2
$a Rakousko $x epidemiologie $7 D001317
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Jahrreiss, Victoria $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Huebner, Nicolai $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Mitterhauser, Markus $u Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Applied Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Stangl-Kremser, Judith $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000286442445
700    1_
$a Grubmüller, Karl Hermann $u Department of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
700    1_
$a Baltzer, Pascal $u Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Hacker, Marcus $u Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Goldner, Gregor $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Department of Urology and Division of Medical Oncology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia. shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at
700    1_
$a Rasul, Sazan $u Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
773    0_
$w MED00008064 $t Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases $x 1476-5608 $g Roč. 24, č. 2 (2021), s. 439-447
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32994534 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220425 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220506130401 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1789860 $s 1163636
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 24 $c 2 $d 439-447 $e 20200929 $i 1476-5608 $m Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases $n Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis $x MED00008064
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220425

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...