-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Opportunistic genomic screening. Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics
G. de Wert, W. Dondorp, A. Clarke, EMC. Dequeker, C. Cordier, Z. Deans, CG. van El, F. Fellmann, R. Hastings, S. Hentze, H. Howard, M. Macek, A. Mendes, C. Patch, E. Rial-Sebbag, V. Stefansdottir, MC. Cornel, F. Forzano, European Society of Human Genetics
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2009
PubMed Central
od 2009 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central
od 2009 do Před 1 rokem
ProQuest Central
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1998-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- genetické testování etika normy MeSH
- genetika člověka etika organizace a řízení normy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma * MeSH
- společnosti lékařské normy MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
If genome sequencing is performed in health care, in theory the opportunity arises to take a further look at the data: opportunistic genomic screening (OGS). The European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) in 2013 recommended that genome analysis should be restricted to the original health problem at least for the time being. Other organizations have argued that 'actionable' genetic variants should or could be reported (including American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, French Society of Predictive and Personalized Medicine, Genomics England). They argue that the opportunity should be used to routinely and systematically look for secondary findings-so-called opportunistic screening. From a normative perspective, the distinguishing characteristic of screening is not so much its context (whether public health or health care), but the lack of an indication for having this specific test or investigation in those to whom screening is offered. Screening entails a more precarious benefits-to-risks balance. The ESHG continues to recommend a cautious approach to opportunistic screening. Proportionality and autonomy must be guaranteed, and in collectively funded health-care systems the potential benefits must be balanced against health care expenditures. With regard to genome sequencing in pediatrics, ESHG argues that it is premature to look for later-onset conditions in children. Counseling should be offered and informed consent is and should be a central ethical norm. Depending on developing evidence on penetrance, actionability, and available resources, OGS pilots may be justified to generate data for a future, informed, comparative analysis of OGS and its main alternatives, such as cascade testing.
CEQAS GenQA John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford UK
Clinical Genetics Department Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Département de génétique SYNLAB Chemin d'Entre Bois 21 1018 Lausanne Switzerland
Department of Genetics and Molecular Medicine Landspitali University Hospital Reykjavik Iceland
Genomics England Queen Mary University of London London UK
Medical Ethics Lund Universitet Lund SE 221 00 Sweden
Praxis für Humangenetik Mannheim Germany
Society and Ethics Research Group Connecting Science Wellcome Genome Campus Cambridge CB10 1SA UK
The ColLaboratory University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22012512
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220506130231.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220425s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41431-020-00758-w $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33223530
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a de Wert, Guido $u Department of Health, Ethics and Society, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, and Research School GROW for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. g.dewert@maastrichtuniversity.nl $1 https://orcid.org/0000000204104902
- 245 10
- $a Opportunistic genomic screening. Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics / $c G. de Wert, W. Dondorp, A. Clarke, EMC. Dequeker, C. Cordier, Z. Deans, CG. van El, F. Fellmann, R. Hastings, S. Hentze, H. Howard, M. Macek, A. Mendes, C. Patch, E. Rial-Sebbag, V. Stefansdottir, MC. Cornel, F. Forzano, European Society of Human Genetics
- 520 9_
- $a If genome sequencing is performed in health care, in theory the opportunity arises to take a further look at the data: opportunistic genomic screening (OGS). The European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) in 2013 recommended that genome analysis should be restricted to the original health problem at least for the time being. Other organizations have argued that 'actionable' genetic variants should or could be reported (including American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, French Society of Predictive and Personalized Medicine, Genomics England). They argue that the opportunity should be used to routinely and systematically look for secondary findings-so-called opportunistic screening. From a normative perspective, the distinguishing characteristic of screening is not so much its context (whether public health or health care), but the lack of an indication for having this specific test or investigation in those to whom screening is offered. Screening entails a more precarious benefits-to-risks balance. The ESHG continues to recommend a cautious approach to opportunistic screening. Proportionality and autonomy must be guaranteed, and in collectively funded health-care systems the potential benefits must be balanced against health care expenditures. With regard to genome sequencing in pediatrics, ESHG argues that it is premature to look for later-onset conditions in children. Counseling should be offered and informed consent is and should be a central ethical norm. Depending on developing evidence on penetrance, actionability, and available resources, OGS pilots may be justified to generate data for a future, informed, comparative analysis of OGS and its main alternatives, such as cascade testing.
- 650 _2
- $a genetické testování $x etika $x normy $7 D005820
- 650 _2
- $a genetika člověka $x etika $x organizace a řízení $x normy $7 D000074705
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $7 D017410
- 650 _2
- $a společnosti lékařské $x normy $7 D012955
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Dondorp, Wybo $u Department of Health, Ethics and Society, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, and Research School GROW for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000340527192
- 700 1_
- $a Clarke, Angus $u Institute of Medical Genetics, Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000212009286 $7 xx0121351
- 700 1_
- $a Dequeker, Elisabeth M C $u Biomedical Quality Assurance Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Cordier, Christophe $u Département de génétique, SYNLAB, Chemin d'Entre-Bois 21, 1018, Lausanne, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Deans, Zandra $u UK National External Quality Assessment Service for Molecular Genetics/Genomics Quality Assessment, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- 700 1_
- $a van El, Carla G $u Section Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000322012320
- 700 1_
- $a Fellmann, Florence $u The ColLaboratory, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Hastings, Ros $u CEQAS/GenQA, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Hentze, Sabine $u Praxis für Humangenetik, Mannheim, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Howard, Heidi $u Medical Ethics, Lund Universitet, Lund, SE-221 00, Sweden $u Division of Industrial Biotechnology, Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, 412 96, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Macek, Milan $u Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000251735280
- 700 1_
- $a Mendes, Alvaro $u UnIGENe and CGPP-Centre for Predictive and Preventive Genetics, IBMC-Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- 700 1_
- $a Patch, Chris $u Genomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK $u Society and Ethics Research Group, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000241910663
- 700 1_
- $a Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle $u Laboratoire d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, UMR 1027 INSERM, Université Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France
- 700 1_
- $a Stefansdottir, Vigdis $u Department of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000344513126
- 700 1_
- $a Cornel, Martina C $u The ColLaboratory, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000253975544
- 700 1_
- $a Forzano, Francesca $u Clinical Genetics Department, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- 710 2_
- $a European Society of Human Genetics
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005019 $t European journal of human genetics : EJHG $x 1476-5438 $g Roč. 29, č. 3 (2021), s. 365-377
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33223530 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220425 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220506130223 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1789917 $s 1163713
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 29 $c 3 $d 365-377 $e 20201122 $i 1476-5438 $m European journal of human genetics $n Eur J Hum Genet $x MED00005019
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220425