• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Tissue Flossing Around the Thigh Does Not Provide Acute Enhancement of Neuromuscular Function

AH. Paravlic, J. Segula, K. Drole, V. Hadzic, M. Pajek, J. Vodicar

. 2022 ; 13 (-) : 870498. [pub] 20220427

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22017291

Nowadays, various methods are used for acute performance enhancement. The most recent of these is tissue flossing, which is becoming increasingly popular for both performance enhancement and rehabilitation. However, the effects of flossing on athletic performance have not been clearly demonstrated, which could be due to differences in the methodology used. In particular, the rest periods between the end of the preconditioning activity and the performance of the criterion task or assessment tools varied considerably in the published literature. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of applying tissue flossing to the thigh on bilateral countermovement jump performance and contractile properties of vastus lateralis (VL) muscle. Nineteen recreational athletes (11 males; aged 23.1 ± 2.7 years) were randomly assigned to days of flossing application (3 sets for 2 min of flossing with 2 min rest between sets) with preset experimental pressure (EXP = 95 ± 17.4 mmHg) or control condition (CON = 18.9 ± 3.5 mmHg). The first part of the measurements was performed before and after warm-up consisting of 5 min of cycling followed by dynamic stretching and specific jumping exercises, while the second part consisted of six measurement points after flossing application (0.5, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 min). The warm-up improved muscle response time (VL = -5%), contraction time (VL = -3.6%) muscle stiffness (VL = 17.5%), contraction velocity (VL = 23.5%), jump height (13.9%) and average power (10.5%). On the contrary, sustain time, half-relaxation time and take-off velocity stayed unaltered. Flossing, however, showed negative effects for muscle response time (F = 18.547, p < 0.001), contraction time (F = 14.899, p < 0.001), muscle stiffness (F = 8.365, p < 0.001), contraction velocity (F = 11.180, p < 0.001), jump height (F = 14.888, p < 0.001) and average power (F = 13.488, p < 0.001), whereas sustain time, half-relaxation time and take-off velocity were unaffected until the end of the study protocol regardless of condition assigned and/or time points of the assessment. It was found that the warm-up routine potentiated neuromuscular function, whereas the flossing protocol used in the current study resulted in fatigue rather than potentiation. Therefore, future studies aimed to investigate the dose-response relationship of different configurations of preconditioning activities on neuromuscular function are warranted.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22017291
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220720100156.0
007      
ta
008      
220718s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fphys.2022.870498 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35574482
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Paravlic, Armin H $u Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia $u Science and Research Centre Koper, Institute for Kinesiology Research, Koper, Slovenia $u Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
245    10
$a Tissue Flossing Around the Thigh Does Not Provide Acute Enhancement of Neuromuscular Function / $c AH. Paravlic, J. Segula, K. Drole, V. Hadzic, M. Pajek, J. Vodicar
520    9_
$a Nowadays, various methods are used for acute performance enhancement. The most recent of these is tissue flossing, which is becoming increasingly popular for both performance enhancement and rehabilitation. However, the effects of flossing on athletic performance have not been clearly demonstrated, which could be due to differences in the methodology used. In particular, the rest periods between the end of the preconditioning activity and the performance of the criterion task or assessment tools varied considerably in the published literature. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of applying tissue flossing to the thigh on bilateral countermovement jump performance and contractile properties of vastus lateralis (VL) muscle. Nineteen recreational athletes (11 males; aged 23.1 ± 2.7 years) were randomly assigned to days of flossing application (3 sets for 2 min of flossing with 2 min rest between sets) with preset experimental pressure (EXP = 95 ± 17.4 mmHg) or control condition (CON = 18.9 ± 3.5 mmHg). The first part of the measurements was performed before and after warm-up consisting of 5 min of cycling followed by dynamic stretching and specific jumping exercises, while the second part consisted of six measurement points after flossing application (0.5, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 min). The warm-up improved muscle response time (VL = -5%), contraction time (VL = -3.6%) muscle stiffness (VL = 17.5%), contraction velocity (VL = 23.5%), jump height (13.9%) and average power (10.5%). On the contrary, sustain time, half-relaxation time and take-off velocity stayed unaltered. Flossing, however, showed negative effects for muscle response time (F = 18.547, p < 0.001), contraction time (F = 14.899, p < 0.001), muscle stiffness (F = 8.365, p < 0.001), contraction velocity (F = 11.180, p < 0.001), jump height (F = 14.888, p < 0.001) and average power (F = 13.488, p < 0.001), whereas sustain time, half-relaxation time and take-off velocity were unaffected until the end of the study protocol regardless of condition assigned and/or time points of the assessment. It was found that the warm-up routine potentiated neuromuscular function, whereas the flossing protocol used in the current study resulted in fatigue rather than potentiation. Therefore, future studies aimed to investigate the dose-response relationship of different configurations of preconditioning activities on neuromuscular function are warranted.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Segula, Jure $u Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
700    1_
$a Drole, Kristina $u Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
700    1_
$a Hadzic, Vedran $u Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
700    1_
$a Pajek, Maja $u Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
700    1_
$a Vodicar, Janez $u Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
773    0_
$w MED00174601 $t Frontiers in physiology $x 1664-042X $g Roč. 13, č. - (2022), s. 870498
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35574482 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20220718 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220720100152 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1816523 $s 1168533
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 13 $c - $d 870498 $e 20220427 $i 1664-042X $m Frontiers in physiology $n Front. physiol. $x MED00174601
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220718

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...