-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Does Wim Hof Method Improve Breathing Economy during Exercise
D. Marko, P. Bahenský, V. Bunc, GJ. Grosicki, JD. Vondrasek
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2012
PubMed Central
od 2012
Europe PubMed Central
od 2012
ProQuest Central
od 2019-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2012-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2012-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2019-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2012
PubMed
35456308
DOI
10.3390/jcm11082218
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
(1) Background: Breathing economy during endurance sports plays a major role in performance. Poor breathing economy is mainly characterized by excessive breathing frequency (BF) and low tidal volume (VT) due to shallow breathing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a 4 week intervention based on the Wim Hof breathing method (WHBM) would improve breathing economy during exercise in adolescent runners. (2) Methods: 19 adolescent (16.6 ± 1.53 years) middle- and long-distance runners (11 boys and 8 girls) participated in the study. Participants were randomly divided into experimental (n = 11) and control groups (n = 8). The study was set in the transition period between competitive race seasons and both groups had a similar training program in terms of running volume and intensity over the course of the study. The experimental group performed breathing exercises every day (~20 min/day) for 4 weeks. The control group did not perform any kind of breathing exercise. The breathing exercises consisted of three sets of controlled hyperventilation and consecutive maximum breath holds. Before and after the intervention, participants performed incremental cycle ergometer testing sessions consisting of two minute stages at 1, 2, 3, and 4 W·kg-1 with breath-by-breath metabolic analysis. During the testing sessions, BF, VT, and minute ventilation (VE) were assessed and compared. (3) Results: There were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) in BF, VT, or VE between experimental and control groups before or after the intervention. A nonsignificant small-to-large effect for an increase in VE and BF in both groups following the 4 week intervention period was observed, possibly due to a reduction in training volume and intensity owing to the down period between competitive seasons. (4) Conclusions: The 4 week intervention of WHBM did not appear to alter parameters of breathing economy during a maximal graded exercise test in adolescent runners.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22017366
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220720100212.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220718s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/jcm11082218 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35456308
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Marko, David $u Sports Motor Skills Laboratory, Faculty of Sports, Physical Training and Education, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000280154530
- 245 10
- $a Does Wim Hof Method Improve Breathing Economy during Exercise / $c D. Marko, P. Bahenský, V. Bunc, GJ. Grosicki, JD. Vondrasek
- 520 9_
- $a (1) Background: Breathing economy during endurance sports plays a major role in performance. Poor breathing economy is mainly characterized by excessive breathing frequency (BF) and low tidal volume (VT) due to shallow breathing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a 4 week intervention based on the Wim Hof breathing method (WHBM) would improve breathing economy during exercise in adolescent runners. (2) Methods: 19 adolescent (16.6 ± 1.53 years) middle- and long-distance runners (11 boys and 8 girls) participated in the study. Participants were randomly divided into experimental (n = 11) and control groups (n = 8). The study was set in the transition period between competitive race seasons and both groups had a similar training program in terms of running volume and intensity over the course of the study. The experimental group performed breathing exercises every day (~20 min/day) for 4 weeks. The control group did not perform any kind of breathing exercise. The breathing exercises consisted of three sets of controlled hyperventilation and consecutive maximum breath holds. Before and after the intervention, participants performed incremental cycle ergometer testing sessions consisting of two minute stages at 1, 2, 3, and 4 W·kg-1 with breath-by-breath metabolic analysis. During the testing sessions, BF, VT, and minute ventilation (VE) were assessed and compared. (3) Results: There were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) in BF, VT, or VE between experimental and control groups before or after the intervention. A nonsignificant small-to-large effect for an increase in VE and BF in both groups following the 4 week intervention period was observed, possibly due to a reduction in training volume and intensity owing to the down period between competitive seasons. (4) Conclusions: The 4 week intervention of WHBM did not appear to alter parameters of breathing economy during a maximal graded exercise test in adolescent runners.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Bahenský, Petr $u Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Education, University of South Bohemia, 371 15 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000259282749
- 700 1_
- $a Bunc, Václav $u Sports Motor Skills Laboratory, Faculty of Sports, Physical Training and Education, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Grosicki, Gregory J $u Biodynamics and Human Performance Center, Georgia Southern University, Savannah, GA 31419, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000189294903
- 700 1_
- $a Vondrasek, Joseph D $u Biodynamics and Human Performance Center, Georgia Southern University, Savannah, GA 31419, USA
- 773 0_
- $w MED00195462 $t Journal of clinical medicine $x 2077-0383 $g Roč. 11, č. 8 (2022)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35456308 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220718 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220720100208 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1816558 $s 1168608
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 11 $c 8 $e 20220415 $i 2077-0383 $m Journal of clinical medicine $n J Clin Med $x MED00195462
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220718