• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Distal Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: The DISCO RADIAL Trial

A. Aminian, GA. Sgueglia, M. Wiemer, J. Kefer, GL. Gasparini, Z. Ruzsa, MAH. van Leeuwen, C. Ungureanu, G. Leibundgut, B. Vandeloo, S. Kedev, I. Bernat, K. Ratib, JF. Iglesias, E. Al Hage, GA. Posteraro, D. Pascut, F. Maes, D. Regazzoli, K....

. 2022 ; 15 (12) : 1191-1201. [pub] 20220517

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22017941

BACKGROUND: Currently, transradial access (TRA) is the recommended access for coronary procedures because of increased safety, with radial artery occlusion (RAO) being its most frequent complication, which will increasingly affect patients undergoing multiple procedures during their lifetimes. Recently, distal radial access (DRA) has emerged as a promising alternative access to minimize RAO risk. A large-scale, international, randomized trial comparing RAO with TRA and DRA is lacking. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the superiority of DRA compared with conventional TRA with respect to forearm RAO. METHODS: DISCO RADIAL (Distal vs Conventional Radial Access) was an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial in which patients with indications for percutaneous coronary procedure using a 6-F Slender sheath were randomized to DRA or TRA with systematic implementation of best practices to reduce RAO. The primary endpoint was the incidence of forearm RAO assessed by vascular ultrasound at discharge. Secondary endpoints include crossover, hemostasis time, and access site-related complications. RESULTS: Overall, 657 patients underwent TRA, and 650 patients underwent DRA. Forearm RAO did not differ between groups (0.91% vs 0.31%; P = 0.29). Patent hemostasis was achieved in 94.4% of TRA patients. Crossover rates were higher with DRA (3.5% vs 7.4%; P = 0.002), and median hemostasis time was shorter (180 vs 153 minutes; P < 0.001). Radial artery spasm occurred more with DRA (2.7% vs 5.4%; P = 0.015). Overall bleeding events and vascular complications did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: With the implementation of a rigorous hemostasis protocol, DRA and TRA have equally low RAO rates. DRA is associated with a higher crossover rate but a shorter hemostasis time.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22017941
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804134456.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.032 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35595673
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Aminian, Adel $u Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium. Electronic address: adaminian@hotmail.com
245    10
$a Distal Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: The DISCO RADIAL Trial / $c A. Aminian, GA. Sgueglia, M. Wiemer, J. Kefer, GL. Gasparini, Z. Ruzsa, MAH. van Leeuwen, C. Ungureanu, G. Leibundgut, B. Vandeloo, S. Kedev, I. Bernat, K. Ratib, JF. Iglesias, E. Al Hage, GA. Posteraro, D. Pascut, F. Maes, D. Regazzoli, K. Kakonyi, TA. Meijers, G. Colletti, L. Krivoshei, S. Lochy, B. Zafirovska, D. Horák, J. Nolan, S. Degrauwe, K. Tobita, S. Saito
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Currently, transradial access (TRA) is the recommended access for coronary procedures because of increased safety, with radial artery occlusion (RAO) being its most frequent complication, which will increasingly affect patients undergoing multiple procedures during their lifetimes. Recently, distal radial access (DRA) has emerged as a promising alternative access to minimize RAO risk. A large-scale, international, randomized trial comparing RAO with TRA and DRA is lacking. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the superiority of DRA compared with conventional TRA with respect to forearm RAO. METHODS: DISCO RADIAL (Distal vs Conventional Radial Access) was an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial in which patients with indications for percutaneous coronary procedure using a 6-F Slender sheath were randomized to DRA or TRA with systematic implementation of best practices to reduce RAO. The primary endpoint was the incidence of forearm RAO assessed by vascular ultrasound at discharge. Secondary endpoints include crossover, hemostasis time, and access site-related complications. RESULTS: Overall, 657 patients underwent TRA, and 650 patients underwent DRA. Forearm RAO did not differ between groups (0.91% vs 0.31%; P = 0.29). Patent hemostasis was achieved in 94.4% of TRA patients. Crossover rates were higher with DRA (3.5% vs 7.4%; P = 0.002), and median hemostasis time was shorter (180 vs 153 minutes; P < 0.001). Radial artery spasm occurred more with DRA (2.7% vs 5.4%; P = 0.015). Overall bleeding events and vascular complications did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: With the implementation of a rigorous hemostasis protocol, DRA and TRA have equally low RAO rates. DRA is associated with a higher crossover rate but a shorter hemostasis time.
650    12
$a arteriální okluzní nemoci $7 D001157
650    12
$a periferní katetrizace $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D002406
650    _2
$a koronární angiografie $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D017023
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a koronární angioplastika $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D062645
650    _2
$a arteria radialis $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D017534
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Sgueglia, Gregory A $u Division of Cardiology, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Wiemer, Marcus $u Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Johannes Wesling University Hospital Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Germany
700    1_
$a Kefer, Joëlle $u Division of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
700    1_
$a Gasparini, Gabriele L $u Cardio Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Ruzsa, Zoltan $u Invasive Cardiology Division, Internal Medicine Department, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary; Cardiac and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
700    1_
$a van Leeuwen, Maarten A H $u Department of Cardiology, Isala Heart Center, Zwolle, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Ungureanu, Claudiu $u Department of Cardiology, Jolimont Hospital, La Louvière, Belgium
700    1_
$a Leibundgut, Gregor $u Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Vandeloo, Bert $u Department of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
700    1_
$a Kedev, Sasko $u Interventional Cardiology Department, University Clinic of Cardiology, Skopje, North Macedonia
700    1_
$a Bernat, Ivo $u Department of Cardiology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ratib, Karim $u Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Iglesias, Juan F $u Department of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Al Hage, Elias $u Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
700    1_
$a Posteraro, Giuseppe A $u Division of Cardiology, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Pascut, Dan $u Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Johannes Wesling University Hospital Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Germany
700    1_
$a Maes, Frederic $u Division of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
700    1_
$a Regazzoli, Damiano $u Cardio Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Kakonyi, Kornél $u Invasive Cardiology Division, Internal Medicine Department, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary; Cardiac and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
700    1_
$a Meijers, Thomas A $u Department of Cardiology, Isala Heart Center, Zwolle, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Colletti, Giuseppe $u Department of Cardiology, Jolimont Hospital, La Louvière, Belgium
700    1_
$a Krivoshei, Lian $u Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Lochy, Stijn $u Department of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
700    1_
$a Zafirovska, Biljana $u Interventional Cardiology Department, University Clinic of Cardiology, Skopje, North Macedonia
700    1_
$a Horák, David $u Department of Cardiology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Nolan, James $u Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Degrauwe, Sophie $u Department of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Tobita, Kazuki $u Department of Cardiology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
700    1_
$a Saito, Shigeru $u Department of Cardiology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
773    0_
$w MED00186218 $t JACC. Cardiovascular interventions $x 1876-7605 $g Roč. 15, č. 12 (2022), s. 1191-1201
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35595673 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804134450 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1821844 $s 1169184
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 15 $c 12 $d 1191-1201 $e 20220517 $i 1876-7605 $m JACC. Cardiovascular interventions $n JACC Cardiovasc Interv $x MED00186218
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace