• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Psychotherapists' Reports regarding the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Their Patients: A Cross-National Descriptive Study Based on the Social-Ecological Model (SEM)

Y. Schaffler, M. Kuska, A. Barke, BK. Doering, K. Gossmann, Z. Meier, N. Kascakova, P. Tavel, E. Humer, C. Pieh, P. Stippl, W. Schimböck, B. Haid, T. Probst

. 2022 ; 19 (11) : . [pub] 20220602

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22018068

The COVID-19 outbreak has raised questions about how vulnerable groups experience the pandemic. Research that focuses on the view of individuals with pre-existing mental health conditions is still limited, and so are cross-country comparative surveys. We gathered our sample of qualitative data during the first lockdown after governmental measures against the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus came into force in Austria, Czechia, Germany, and Slovakia. A total of n = 1690 psychotherapists from four middle European countries answered the question of how the COVID-19 pandemic was addressed in sessions by their patients during the early stage of unprecedented public health conditions. We employed a descriptive qualitative methodology to determine themes following levels of the social-ecological model (SEM) regarding how the COVID-19 pandemic affected patients. At the public policy level, stressful environmental conditions concerned the governmental mitigation efforts. At the level of community/society, reported key themes were employment, restricted access to educational and health facilities, socioeconomic consequences, and the pandemic itself. Key themes at the interpersonal level regarded forced proximity, the possibility of infection of loved ones, childcare, and homeschooling. Key themes at the individual level were the possibility of contracting COVID-19, having to stay at home/isolation, and a changing environment. Within the SEM framework, adaptive and maladaptive responses to these stressors were reported, with more similarities than differences between the countries. A quantification of word stems showed that the maladaptive reactions predominated.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22018068
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804134533.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/ijerph19116825 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35682406
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Schaffler, Yvonne $u Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000340688930
245    10
$a Psychotherapists' Reports regarding the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Their Patients: A Cross-National Descriptive Study Based on the Social-Ecological Model (SEM) / $c Y. Schaffler, M. Kuska, A. Barke, BK. Doering, K. Gossmann, Z. Meier, N. Kascakova, P. Tavel, E. Humer, C. Pieh, P. Stippl, W. Schimböck, B. Haid, T. Probst
520    9_
$a The COVID-19 outbreak has raised questions about how vulnerable groups experience the pandemic. Research that focuses on the view of individuals with pre-existing mental health conditions is still limited, and so are cross-country comparative surveys. We gathered our sample of qualitative data during the first lockdown after governmental measures against the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus came into force in Austria, Czechia, Germany, and Slovakia. A total of n = 1690 psychotherapists from four middle European countries answered the question of how the COVID-19 pandemic was addressed in sessions by their patients during the early stage of unprecedented public health conditions. We employed a descriptive qualitative methodology to determine themes following levels of the social-ecological model (SEM) regarding how the COVID-19 pandemic affected patients. At the public policy level, stressful environmental conditions concerned the governmental mitigation efforts. At the level of community/society, reported key themes were employment, restricted access to educational and health facilities, socioeconomic consequences, and the pandemic itself. Key themes at the interpersonal level regarded forced proximity, the possibility of infection of loved ones, childcare, and homeschooling. Key themes at the individual level were the possibility of contracting COVID-19, having to stay at home/isolation, and a changing environment. Within the SEM framework, adaptive and maladaptive responses to these stressors were reported, with more similarities than differences between the countries. A quantification of word stems showed that the maladaptive reactions predominated.
650    12
$a COVID-19 $x epidemiologie $7 D000086382
650    _2
$a kontrola infekčních nemocí $7 D003140
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a pandemie $7 D058873
650    _2
$a psychoterapeuti $7 D000082383
650    _2
$a SARS-CoV-2 $7 D000086402
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kuska, Martin $u Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria $u College of Applied Psychology, 41155 Terezin, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Barke, Antonia $u Clinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany
700    1_
$a Doering, Bettina K $u Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, 16861 Neuruppin, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000301998362
700    1_
$a Gossmann, Katharina $u Clinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000306080534
700    1_
$a Meier, Zdenek $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University Olomouc, 77111 Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kascakova, Natalia $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University Olomouc, 77111 Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Psychiatric-Psychotherapeutic Outpatient Clinic, Pro Mente Sana, 81108 Bratislava, Slovakia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000320212847 $7 xx0063778
700    1_
$a Tavel, Peter $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacky University Olomouc, 77111 Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Humer, Elke $u Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000197760353
700    1_
$a Pieh, Christoph $u Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/000000032708303X
700    1_
$a Stippl, Peter $u Austrian Federal Association for Psychotherapy, 1030 Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Schimböck, Wolfgang $u Austrian Federal Association for Psychotherapy, 1030 Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Haid, Barbara $u Austrian Federal Association for Psychotherapy, 1030 Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Probst, Thomas $u Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000261132133
773    0_
$w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 19, č. 11 (2022)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35682406 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804134526 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1821908 $s 1169311
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 19 $c 11 $e 20220602 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720
Zpět

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace