-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
A modified Delphi process to establish research priorities in hernia surgery
DSG. Scrimgeour, M. Allan, SR. Knight, B. East, S. Blackwell, N. Dames, L. Laidlaw, D. Light, L. Horgan, NJ. Smart, A. de Beaux, MSJ. Wilson, Scottish Surgical Research Group and the British Hernia Society
Jazyk angličtina Země Francie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- abdominální hernie * MeSH
- biomedicínský výzkum * MeSH
- chirurgie trávicího traktu * MeSH
- delfská metoda MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- operace kýly MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide, yet despite this, there remains a lack of high-quality evidence to support best management. The aim of the study was to use a modified Delphi process to determine future research priorities in this field. METHODS: Stakeholders were invited by email, using British Hernia Society membership details or Twitter, to submit individual research questions via an online survey. In addition, questions obtained from a patient focus group (PFG) were collated to form Phase I. Two rounds of prioritization by stakeholders (phases II and III) were then completed to determine a final list of research questions. All questions were analyzed on an anonymized basis. RESULTS: A total of 266 questions, 19 from the PFG, were submitted by 113 stakeholders in Phase I. Of these, 64 questions were taken forward for prioritization in Phase II, which was completed by 107 stakeholders. Following Phase II analysis, 97 stakeholders prioritized 36 questions in Phase III. This resulted in a final list of 14 research questions, 3 of which were from the PFG. Stakeholders included patients and healthcare professionals (consultant surgeons, trainee surgeons and other multidisciplinary members) from over 27 countries during the 3 phases. CONCLUSION: The study has identified 14 key research priorities pertaining to abdominal wall hernia surgery. Uniquely, these priorities have been determined from participation by both healthcare professionals and patients. These priorities should now be addressed by well-designed, high-quality international collaborative research.
3rd Department of Surgery Motol University Hospital 5 Uvalu 84 150 06 Prague Czech Republic
Centre for Medical Informatics Usher Institute University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH16 4UX Scotland
Department of Colorectal Surgery Aberdeen Royal Infirmary Aberdeen AB25 2ZN Scotland
Department of General Surgery Forth Valley Royal Hospital Larbert FK5 4WR UK
Department of General Surgery Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH16 4SA Scotland
Institute of Genetics and Cancer University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH4 2XU Scotland
Patient Representative Edinburgh UK
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22018178
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804134613.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 fr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10029-021-02519-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34718903
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a fr
- 100 1_
- $a Scrimgeour, D S G $u Department of Colorectal Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN, Scotland. duncan.scrimgeour@nhs.scot
- 245 12
- $a A modified Delphi process to establish research priorities in hernia surgery / $c DSG. Scrimgeour, M. Allan, SR. Knight, B. East, S. Blackwell, N. Dames, L. Laidlaw, D. Light, L. Horgan, NJ. Smart, A. de Beaux, MSJ. Wilson, Scottish Surgical Research Group and the British Hernia Society
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide, yet despite this, there remains a lack of high-quality evidence to support best management. The aim of the study was to use a modified Delphi process to determine future research priorities in this field. METHODS: Stakeholders were invited by email, using British Hernia Society membership details or Twitter, to submit individual research questions via an online survey. In addition, questions obtained from a patient focus group (PFG) were collated to form Phase I. Two rounds of prioritization by stakeholders (phases II and III) were then completed to determine a final list of research questions. All questions were analyzed on an anonymized basis. RESULTS: A total of 266 questions, 19 from the PFG, were submitted by 113 stakeholders in Phase I. Of these, 64 questions were taken forward for prioritization in Phase II, which was completed by 107 stakeholders. Following Phase II analysis, 97 stakeholders prioritized 36 questions in Phase III. This resulted in a final list of 14 research questions, 3 of which were from the PFG. Stakeholders included patients and healthcare professionals (consultant surgeons, trainee surgeons and other multidisciplinary members) from over 27 countries during the 3 phases. CONCLUSION: The study has identified 14 key research priorities pertaining to abdominal wall hernia surgery. Uniquely, these priorities have been determined from participation by both healthcare professionals and patients. These priorities should now be addressed by well-designed, high-quality international collaborative research.
- 650 12
- $a biomedicínský výzkum $7 D035843
- 650 _2
- $a delfská metoda $7 D003697
- 650 12
- $a chirurgie trávicího traktu $7 D013505
- 650 12
- $a abdominální hernie $7 D046449
- 650 _2
- $a operace kýly $7 D059685
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Allan, M $u Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, Scotland
- 700 1_
- $a Knight, S R $u Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, Scotland
- 700 1_
- $a East, B $u 3rd Department of Surgery, Motol University Hospital, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, FK5 4WR, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Blackwell, S $u Patient Representative, Liverpool, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Dames, N $u Patient Representative, Glasgow, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Laidlaw, L $u Patient Representative, Edinburgh, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Light, D $u Department of UGI Surgery, Northumbria Healthcare NHSFT, Rake Ln, Tyne and Wear, North Shields, NE29 8NH, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Horgan, L $u Department of UGI Surgery, Northumbria Healthcare NHSFT, Rake Ln, Tyne and Wear, North Shields, NE29 8NH, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Smart, N J $u Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX25DW, Devon, UK
- 700 1_
- $a de Beaux, A $u Department of General Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, Scotland
- 700 1_
- $a Wilson, M S J $u Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, FK5 4WR, UK
- 710 2_
- $a Scottish Surgical Research Group and the British Hernia Society
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005723 $t Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery $x 1248-9204 $g Roč. 26, č. 3 (2022), s. 751-759
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34718903 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804134607 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1821986 $s 1169421
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 26 $c 3 $d 751-759 $e 20211031 $i 1248-9204 $m Hernia $n Hernia $x MED00005723
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720