Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Modern and prebiotic amino acids support distinct structural profiles in proteins

V. Tretyachenko, J. Vymětal, T. Neuwirthová, J. Vondrášek, K. Fujishima, K. Hlouchová

. 2022 ; 12 (6) : 220040. [pub] 20220622

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

The earliest proteins had to rely on amino acids available on early Earth before the biosynthetic pathways for more complex amino acids evolved. In extant proteins, a significant fraction of the 'late' amino acids (such as Arg, Lys, His, Cys, Trp and Tyr) belong to essential catalytic and structure-stabilizing residues. How (or if) early proteins could sustain an early biosphere has been a major puzzle. Here, we analysed two combinatorial protein libraries representing proxies of the available sequence space at two different evolutionary stages. The first is composed of the entire alphabet of 20 amino acids while the second one consists of only 10 residues (ASDGLIPTEV) representing a consensus view of plausibly available amino acids through prebiotic chemistry. We show that compact conformations resistant to proteolysis are surprisingly similarly abundant in both libraries. In addition, the early alphabet proteins are inherently more soluble and refoldable, independent of the general Hsp70 chaperone activity. By contrast, chaperones significantly increase the otherwise poor solubility of the modern alphabet proteins suggesting their coevolution with the amino acid repertoire. Our work indicates that while both early and modern amino acids are predisposed to supporting protein structure, they do so with different biophysical properties and via different mechanisms.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22018252
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804134645.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1098/rsob.220040 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35728622
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Tretyachenko, Vyacheslav $u Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 12843, Czech Republic $u Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 12843, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Modern and prebiotic amino acids support distinct structural profiles in proteins / $c V. Tretyachenko, J. Vymětal, T. Neuwirthová, J. Vondrášek, K. Fujishima, K. Hlouchová
520    9_
$a The earliest proteins had to rely on amino acids available on early Earth before the biosynthetic pathways for more complex amino acids evolved. In extant proteins, a significant fraction of the 'late' amino acids (such as Arg, Lys, His, Cys, Trp and Tyr) belong to essential catalytic and structure-stabilizing residues. How (or if) early proteins could sustain an early biosphere has been a major puzzle. Here, we analysed two combinatorial protein libraries representing proxies of the available sequence space at two different evolutionary stages. The first is composed of the entire alphabet of 20 amino acids while the second one consists of only 10 residues (ASDGLIPTEV) representing a consensus view of plausibly available amino acids through prebiotic chemistry. We show that compact conformations resistant to proteolysis are surprisingly similarly abundant in both libraries. In addition, the early alphabet proteins are inherently more soluble and refoldable, independent of the general Hsp70 chaperone activity. By contrast, chaperones significantly increase the otherwise poor solubility of the modern alphabet proteins suggesting their coevolution with the amino acid repertoire. Our work indicates that while both early and modern amino acids are predisposed to supporting protein structure, they do so with different biophysical properties and via different mechanisms.
650    12
$a aminokyseliny $x chemie $7 D000596
650    12
$a prebiotika $7 D056692
650    _2
$a sbalování proteinů $7 D017510
650    _2
$a proteiny $x chemie $7 D011506
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Vymětal, Jiří $u Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 16610, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Neuwirthová, Tereza $u Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 12843, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vondrášek, Jiří $u Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 16610, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Fujishima, Kosuke $u Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 1528550, Japan $u Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Fujisawa 2520882 Japan
700    1_
$a Hlouchová, Klára $u Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 12843, Czech Republic $u Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 16610, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00190574 $t Open biology $x 2046-2441 $g Roč. 12, č. 6 (2022), s. 220040
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35728622 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804134639 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1822043 $s 1169495
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 12 $c 6 $d 220040 $e 20220622 $i 2046-2441 $m Open biology $n Open Biol $x MED00190574
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...