-
Something wrong with this record ?
Modern and prebiotic amino acids support distinct structural profiles in proteins
V. Tretyachenko, J. Vymětal, T. Neuwirthová, J. Vondrášek, K. Fujishima, K. Hlouchová
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2011
Free Medical Journals
from 2011
Freely Accessible Science Journals
from 2011-09-01
PubMed Central
from 2011
Europe PubMed Central
from 2011
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2011
PubMed
35728622
DOI
10.1098/rsob.220040
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Amino Acids * chemistry MeSH
- Prebiotics * MeSH
- Proteins chemistry MeSH
- Protein Folding MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The earliest proteins had to rely on amino acids available on early Earth before the biosynthetic pathways for more complex amino acids evolved. In extant proteins, a significant fraction of the 'late' amino acids (such as Arg, Lys, His, Cys, Trp and Tyr) belong to essential catalytic and structure-stabilizing residues. How (or if) early proteins could sustain an early biosphere has been a major puzzle. Here, we analysed two combinatorial protein libraries representing proxies of the available sequence space at two different evolutionary stages. The first is composed of the entire alphabet of 20 amino acids while the second one consists of only 10 residues (ASDGLIPTEV) representing a consensus view of plausibly available amino acids through prebiotic chemistry. We show that compact conformations resistant to proteolysis are surprisingly similarly abundant in both libraries. In addition, the early alphabet proteins are inherently more soluble and refoldable, independent of the general Hsp70 chaperone activity. By contrast, chaperones significantly increase the otherwise poor solubility of the modern alphabet proteins suggesting their coevolution with the amino acid repertoire. Our work indicates that while both early and modern amino acids are predisposed to supporting protein structure, they do so with different biophysical properties and via different mechanisms.
Department of Biochemistry Faculty of Science Charles University Prague 12843 Czech Republic
Department of Cell Biology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague 12843 Czech Republic
Earth Life Science Institute Tokyo Institute of Technology Tokyo 1528550 Japan
Graduate School of Media and Governance Keio University Fujisawa 2520882 Japan
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22018252
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804134645.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1098/rsob.220040 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35728622
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Tretyachenko, Vyacheslav $u Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 12843, Czech Republic $u Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 12843, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Modern and prebiotic amino acids support distinct structural profiles in proteins / $c V. Tretyachenko, J. Vymětal, T. Neuwirthová, J. Vondrášek, K. Fujishima, K. Hlouchová
- 520 9_
- $a The earliest proteins had to rely on amino acids available on early Earth before the biosynthetic pathways for more complex amino acids evolved. In extant proteins, a significant fraction of the 'late' amino acids (such as Arg, Lys, His, Cys, Trp and Tyr) belong to essential catalytic and structure-stabilizing residues. How (or if) early proteins could sustain an early biosphere has been a major puzzle. Here, we analysed two combinatorial protein libraries representing proxies of the available sequence space at two different evolutionary stages. The first is composed of the entire alphabet of 20 amino acids while the second one consists of only 10 residues (ASDGLIPTEV) representing a consensus view of plausibly available amino acids through prebiotic chemistry. We show that compact conformations resistant to proteolysis are surprisingly similarly abundant in both libraries. In addition, the early alphabet proteins are inherently more soluble and refoldable, independent of the general Hsp70 chaperone activity. By contrast, chaperones significantly increase the otherwise poor solubility of the modern alphabet proteins suggesting their coevolution with the amino acid repertoire. Our work indicates that while both early and modern amino acids are predisposed to supporting protein structure, they do so with different biophysical properties and via different mechanisms.
- 650 12
- $a aminokyseliny $x chemie $7 D000596
- 650 12
- $a prebiotika $7 D056692
- 650 _2
- $a sbalování proteinů $7 D017510
- 650 _2
- $a proteiny $x chemie $7 D011506
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Vymětal, Jiří $u Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 16610, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Neuwirthová, Tereza $u Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 12843, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vondrášek, Jiří $u Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 16610, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Fujishima, Kosuke $u Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 1528550, Japan $u Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Fujisawa 2520882 Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Hlouchová, Klára $u Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 12843, Czech Republic $u Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 16610, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00190574 $t Open biology $x 2046-2441 $g Roč. 12, č. 6 (2022), s. 220040
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35728622 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804134639 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1822043 $s 1169495
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 12 $c 6 $d 220040 $e 20220622 $i 2046-2441 $m Open biology $n Open Biol $x MED00190574
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720