• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Understanding orthodontists' decision making in relation to innovations from encounter to implementation: A qualitative study

M. Papakostopoulou, J. Kučera, H. Tycová

. 2022 ; 161 (4) : e316-e335. [pub] 20220125

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22018896

INTRODUCTION: High-quality scientific and technological advancements are necessary if quality improvement is to be achieved in orthodontic treatment. However, suboptimal research uptake in clinical practice and innovation adoption patterns that are not consistent with scientific evidence suggest that a better understanding of the adoption behavior of clinicians is needed. This research aimed to explore the factors that influence orthodontists to adopt innovations into practice. METHODS: This was a qualitative study in which 9 semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with orthodontists and third-year orthodontic residents. The interviews were digitally recorded, and field notes were taken. Data were professionally transcribed verbatim and deidentified. Thematic analysis was used to inductively generate codes and subsequent themes. This study was reported according to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies checklist. RESULTS: Six main themes emerged as facilitators or barriers to adoption. In addition, a sequence of events that took place from knowledge encounter through to implementation was described. Factors influencing adoption included: the perceived state of one's current practice; features of the encounter; attributes of the innovation; clinician's personality traits; practice management; and external influences relating to the professional community, patients, and marketing pressures. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides an insight into what orthodontists consider in their decisions to adopt new knowledge into clinical practice. The findings can help clinicians navigate decision making around innovation adoption by increasing awareness of the factors that influence this process to ensure that switching practice leads to quality improvement.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22018896
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804135151.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.10.012 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35086738
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Papakostopoulou, Margarita $u Department of Orthodontics, First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: margypapak@gmail.com
245    10
$a Understanding orthodontists' decision making in relation to innovations from encounter to implementation: A qualitative study / $c M. Papakostopoulou, J. Kučera, H. Tycová
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: High-quality scientific and technological advancements are necessary if quality improvement is to be achieved in orthodontic treatment. However, suboptimal research uptake in clinical practice and innovation adoption patterns that are not consistent with scientific evidence suggest that a better understanding of the adoption behavior of clinicians is needed. This research aimed to explore the factors that influence orthodontists to adopt innovations into practice. METHODS: This was a qualitative study in which 9 semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with orthodontists and third-year orthodontic residents. The interviews were digitally recorded, and field notes were taken. Data were professionally transcribed verbatim and deidentified. Thematic analysis was used to inductively generate codes and subsequent themes. This study was reported according to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies checklist. RESULTS: Six main themes emerged as facilitators or barriers to adoption. In addition, a sequence of events that took place from knowledge encounter through to implementation was described. Factors influencing adoption included: the perceived state of one's current practice; features of the encounter; attributes of the innovation; clinician's personality traits; practice management; and external influences relating to the professional community, patients, and marketing pressures. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides an insight into what orthodontists consider in their decisions to adopt new knowledge into clinical practice. The findings can help clinicians navigate decision making around innovation adoption by increasing awareness of the factors that influence this process to ensure that switching practice leads to quality improvement.
650    12
$a rozhodování $7 D003657
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a ortodontisté $7 D000066792
650    _2
$a kvalitativní výzkum $7 D036301
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kučera, Josef $u Department of Orthodontics, First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tycová, Hana $u Department of Orthodontics, First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00000274 $t American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics $x 1097-6752 $g Roč. 161, č. 4 (2022), s. e316-e335
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35086738 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804135145 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1822471 $s 1170139
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 161 $c 4 $d e316-e335 $e 20220125 $i 1097-6752 $m American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics $n Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop $x MED00000274
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace