-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Designing industrial work to be 'just right' to promote health - a study protocol for a goldilocks work intervention
AF. Lerche, SE. Mathiassen, CL. Rasmussen, L. Straker, K. Søgaard, A. Holtermann
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu protokol klinické studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2001-01-12
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
PubMed Central
od 2001
Europe PubMed Central
od 2001
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- hygiena práce * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- podpora zdraví * metody MeSH
- pracoviště MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- stoj MeSH
- únava MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- protokol klinické studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: The Goldilocks Work Principle expresses that productive work should be designed to promote workers' health. We recently showed that it is feasible to develop and implement modifications to productive work that change physical behaviors (i.e. sitting, standing and being active) in a direction that may promote health among industrial workers. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to conduct a cluster randomised controlled trial investigating health effects of implementing the Goldilocks Work intervention among industrial workers. METHODS: Our implementation plan consists of educating work teams, organizing implementation meetings, and providing feedback to workers. Three meetings with a preselected local workplace group will be scheduled. The first meeting educates the group to use a planning tool by which work can be planned to have 'just right' physical behaviors. The second and third meetings will focus on supporting implementation of the tool in daily work. An expected 28 clusters of work teams across two participating production sites will be randomized to either intervention or control group. Data collection will consist of 1) questionnaires regarding work and musculoskeletal health, 2) wearable sensor measurements of the physical behavior, and 3) assessment of general health indicators, including BMI, blood pressure, and fat percentage. The primary outcome is musculoskeletal health, measured by low back pain intensity, and secondary outcomes are 1) physical behaviors at work, 2) accumulated time in long bouts of sitting, standing, and being active and 3) perceived fatigue and energy during work. Furthermore, implementation and cost of the intervention will be evaluated based on questionnaires and data from the planning tool completed by the workers. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a 12 - weeks Goldilocks Work intervention with the aim of improving musculoskeletal health among industrial workers. The cluster randomized controlled study design and the evaluation of the implementation, results and costs of the intervention will make it capable of contributing with valuable evidence of how productive work may be designed to promote industrial workers' health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration was assigned 10-09-2021 (ISRCTN80969503). https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN80969503.
Department of Clinical Research University of Southern Denmark 5230 Odense Denmark
Faculty of Physical Culture Palacký University Olomouc 77147 Olomouc Czech Republic
National Research Centre for the Working Environment Lersø Park Allé 105 2100 Copenhagen Denmark
School of Allied Health Curtin University Perth WA 6102 Australia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22019364
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804135608.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12889-022-12643-w $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35197018
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Lerche, Anders Fritz $u National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Park Allé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. afl@nfa.dk $u Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense, Denmark. afl@nfa.dk $1 https://orcid.org/0000000231996571
- 245 10
- $a Designing industrial work to be 'just right' to promote health - a study protocol for a goldilocks work intervention / $c AF. Lerche, SE. Mathiassen, CL. Rasmussen, L. Straker, K. Søgaard, A. Holtermann
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The Goldilocks Work Principle expresses that productive work should be designed to promote workers' health. We recently showed that it is feasible to develop and implement modifications to productive work that change physical behaviors (i.e. sitting, standing and being active) in a direction that may promote health among industrial workers. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to conduct a cluster randomised controlled trial investigating health effects of implementing the Goldilocks Work intervention among industrial workers. METHODS: Our implementation plan consists of educating work teams, organizing implementation meetings, and providing feedback to workers. Three meetings with a preselected local workplace group will be scheduled. The first meeting educates the group to use a planning tool by which work can be planned to have 'just right' physical behaviors. The second and third meetings will focus on supporting implementation of the tool in daily work. An expected 28 clusters of work teams across two participating production sites will be randomized to either intervention or control group. Data collection will consist of 1) questionnaires regarding work and musculoskeletal health, 2) wearable sensor measurements of the physical behavior, and 3) assessment of general health indicators, including BMI, blood pressure, and fat percentage. The primary outcome is musculoskeletal health, measured by low back pain intensity, and secondary outcomes are 1) physical behaviors at work, 2) accumulated time in long bouts of sitting, standing, and being active and 3) perceived fatigue and energy during work. Furthermore, implementation and cost of the intervention will be evaluated based on questionnaires and data from the planning tool completed by the workers. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a 12 - weeks Goldilocks Work intervention with the aim of improving musculoskeletal health among industrial workers. The cluster randomized controlled study design and the evaluation of the implementation, results and costs of the intervention will make it capable of contributing with valuable evidence of how productive work may be designed to promote industrial workers' health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration was assigned 10-09-2021 (ISRCTN80969503). https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN80969503.
- 650 _2
- $a únava $7 D005221
- 650 12
- $a podpora zdraví $x metody $7 D006293
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a hygiena práce $7 D016272
- 650 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
- 650 _2
- $a stoj $7 D000078783
- 650 _2
- $a pracoviště $7 D017132
- 655 _2
- $a protokol klinické studie $7 D000078325
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Mathiassen, Svend Erik $u Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, University of Gävle, 80176, Gävle, Sweden $1 https://orcid.org/0000000314436211
- 700 1_
- $a Rasmussen, Charlotte Lund $u Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, 77147, Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000321935019
- 700 1_
- $a Straker, Leon $u School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000277864128
- 700 1_
- $a Søgaard, Karen $u Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense, Denmark $1 https://orcid.org/0000000339686364
- 700 1_
- $a Holtermann, Andreas $u National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Park Allé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark $u Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense, Denmark $1 https://orcid.org/0000000348255697
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008205 $t BMC public health $x 1471-2458 $g Roč. 22, č. 1 (2022), s. 381
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35197018 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804135601 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1822807 $s 1170607
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 22 $c 1 $d 381 $e 20220223 $i 1471-2458 $m BMC public health $n BMC Public Health $x MED00008205
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720