Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Designing industrial work to be 'just right' to promote health - a study protocol for a goldilocks work intervention

AF. Lerche, SE. Mathiassen, CL. Rasmussen, L. Straker, K. Søgaard, A. Holtermann

. 2022 ; 22 (1) : 381. [pub] 20220223

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu protokol klinické studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22019364

BACKGROUND: The Goldilocks Work Principle expresses that productive work should be designed to promote workers' health. We recently showed that it is feasible to develop and implement modifications to productive work that change physical behaviors (i.e. sitting, standing and being active) in a direction that may promote health among industrial workers. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to conduct a cluster randomised controlled trial investigating health effects of implementing the Goldilocks Work intervention among industrial workers. METHODS: Our implementation plan consists of educating work teams, organizing implementation meetings, and providing feedback to workers. Three meetings with a preselected local workplace group will be scheduled. The first meeting educates the group to use a planning tool by which work can be planned to have 'just right' physical behaviors. The second and third meetings will focus on supporting implementation of the tool in daily work. An expected 28 clusters of work teams across two participating production sites will be randomized to either intervention or control group. Data collection will consist of 1) questionnaires regarding work and musculoskeletal health, 2) wearable sensor measurements of the physical behavior, and 3) assessment of general health indicators, including BMI, blood pressure, and fat percentage. The primary outcome is musculoskeletal health, measured by low back pain intensity, and secondary outcomes are 1) physical behaviors at work, 2) accumulated time in long bouts of sitting, standing, and being active and 3) perceived fatigue and energy during work. Furthermore, implementation and cost of the intervention will be evaluated based on questionnaires and data from the planning tool completed by the workers. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a 12 - weeks Goldilocks Work intervention with the aim of improving musculoskeletal health among industrial workers. The cluster randomized controlled study design and the evaluation of the implementation, results and costs of the intervention will make it capable of contributing with valuable evidence of how productive work may be designed to promote industrial workers' health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration was assigned 10-09-2021 (ISRCTN80969503). https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN80969503.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22019364
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804135608.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12889-022-12643-w $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35197018
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Lerche, Anders Fritz $u National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Park Allé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. afl@nfa.dk $u Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense, Denmark. afl@nfa.dk $1 https://orcid.org/0000000231996571
245    10
$a Designing industrial work to be 'just right' to promote health - a study protocol for a goldilocks work intervention / $c AF. Lerche, SE. Mathiassen, CL. Rasmussen, L. Straker, K. Søgaard, A. Holtermann
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The Goldilocks Work Principle expresses that productive work should be designed to promote workers' health. We recently showed that it is feasible to develop and implement modifications to productive work that change physical behaviors (i.e. sitting, standing and being active) in a direction that may promote health among industrial workers. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to conduct a cluster randomised controlled trial investigating health effects of implementing the Goldilocks Work intervention among industrial workers. METHODS: Our implementation plan consists of educating work teams, organizing implementation meetings, and providing feedback to workers. Three meetings with a preselected local workplace group will be scheduled. The first meeting educates the group to use a planning tool by which work can be planned to have 'just right' physical behaviors. The second and third meetings will focus on supporting implementation of the tool in daily work. An expected 28 clusters of work teams across two participating production sites will be randomized to either intervention or control group. Data collection will consist of 1) questionnaires regarding work and musculoskeletal health, 2) wearable sensor measurements of the physical behavior, and 3) assessment of general health indicators, including BMI, blood pressure, and fat percentage. The primary outcome is musculoskeletal health, measured by low back pain intensity, and secondary outcomes are 1) physical behaviors at work, 2) accumulated time in long bouts of sitting, standing, and being active and 3) perceived fatigue and energy during work. Furthermore, implementation and cost of the intervention will be evaluated based on questionnaires and data from the planning tool completed by the workers. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a 12 - weeks Goldilocks Work intervention with the aim of improving musculoskeletal health among industrial workers. The cluster randomized controlled study design and the evaluation of the implementation, results and costs of the intervention will make it capable of contributing with valuable evidence of how productive work may be designed to promote industrial workers' health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration was assigned 10-09-2021 (ISRCTN80969503). https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN80969503.
650    _2
$a únava $7 D005221
650    12
$a podpora zdraví $x metody $7 D006293
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a hygiena práce $7 D016272
650    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
650    _2
$a stoj $7 D000078783
650    _2
$a pracoviště $7 D017132
655    _2
$a protokol klinické studie $7 D000078325
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Mathiassen, Svend Erik $u Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, University of Gävle, 80176, Gävle, Sweden $1 https://orcid.org/0000000314436211
700    1_
$a Rasmussen, Charlotte Lund $u Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, 77147, Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000321935019
700    1_
$a Straker, Leon $u School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000277864128
700    1_
$a Søgaard, Karen $u Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense, Denmark $1 https://orcid.org/0000000339686364
700    1_
$a Holtermann, Andreas $u National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Park Allé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark $u Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense, Denmark $1 https://orcid.org/0000000348255697
773    0_
$w MED00008205 $t BMC public health $x 1471-2458 $g Roč. 22, č. 1 (2022), s. 381
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35197018 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804135601 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1822807 $s 1170607
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 22 $c 1 $d 381 $e 20220223 $i 1471-2458 $m BMC public health $n BMC Public Health $x MED00008205
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...