-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Radical Cystectomy vs. Radiotherapy in Urothelial Bladder Cancer in Elderly and Very Elderly Patients
B. Horlemann, C. Würnschimmel, B. Hoeh, G. Sorce, F. Chierigo, RS. Flammia, Z. Tian, F. Saad, A. Briganti, SF. Shariat, M. Galucci, FKH. Chun, M. Graefen, PI. Karakiewicz
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Odkazy
PubMed
34620567
DOI
10.1016/j.clgc.2021.08.003
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- cystektomie metody MeSH
- karcinom z přechodných buněk * farmakoterapie chirurgie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- močový měchýř patologie MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * radioterapie chirurgie MeSH
- program SEER MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Controversy regarding cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of elderly and very elderly patients with muscle-invasive, non-metastatic, urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCUB) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) vs radiotherapy (RT) still exists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the 2004-2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, we identified 2663 UCUB patients aged 75-79 (1808 RC vs 855 RT) and 3569 UCUB patients aged 80-89 (1551 RC vs 2018 RT). After stratification for concomitant chemotherapy, propensity score matching (PSM) between RC and RT was applied and competing-risks regression models addressed CSM and OCM. RESULTS: In the cohort aged 75-79, five-year CSM rates were 22.0 vs 49.0% for RC only vs RT only and yielded a HR of 0.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.57, p<0.001) favoring RC only. Five-year CSM rates were 28.3 vs 44.3% for RC with chemotherapy vs trimodal therapy (TMT) and yielded a HR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.35-0.65, p<0.001) favoring RC with chemotherapy. In the cohort aged 80-89, five-year CSM rates were 24.2 vs 48.9% for RC only vs RT only and yielded a HR of 0.42 (95% CI 0.33-0.52, p<0.001) favoring RC only. Five-year CSM rates were 19.6 vs 43.2% for RC with chemotherapy vs TMT and yielded a HR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.28-0.67, p<0.001) favoring RC with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly and very elderly patients, radical cystectomy is associated with virtually half the CSM rate than radiotherapy, regardless of concomitant chemotherapy administration.
Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences University of Genova Genova Italy
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology University Hospital Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main Germany
Department of Urology University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY
Martini Klinik Prostate Cancer Center University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22019410
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804135630.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.08.003 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34620567
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Horlemann, Benedikt $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: bhorlemann@googlemail.com
- 245 10
- $a Radical Cystectomy vs. Radiotherapy in Urothelial Bladder Cancer in Elderly and Very Elderly Patients / $c B. Horlemann, C. Würnschimmel, B. Hoeh, G. Sorce, F. Chierigo, RS. Flammia, Z. Tian, F. Saad, A. Briganti, SF. Shariat, M. Galucci, FKH. Chun, M. Graefen, PI. Karakiewicz
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Controversy regarding cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of elderly and very elderly patients with muscle-invasive, non-metastatic, urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCUB) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) vs radiotherapy (RT) still exists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the 2004-2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, we identified 2663 UCUB patients aged 75-79 (1808 RC vs 855 RT) and 3569 UCUB patients aged 80-89 (1551 RC vs 2018 RT). After stratification for concomitant chemotherapy, propensity score matching (PSM) between RC and RT was applied and competing-risks regression models addressed CSM and OCM. RESULTS: In the cohort aged 75-79, five-year CSM rates were 22.0 vs 49.0% for RC only vs RT only and yielded a HR of 0.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.57, p<0.001) favoring RC only. Five-year CSM rates were 28.3 vs 44.3% for RC with chemotherapy vs trimodal therapy (TMT) and yielded a HR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.35-0.65, p<0.001) favoring RC with chemotherapy. In the cohort aged 80-89, five-year CSM rates were 24.2 vs 48.9% for RC only vs RT only and yielded a HR of 0.42 (95% CI 0.33-0.52, p<0.001) favoring RC only. Five-year CSM rates were 19.6 vs 43.2% for RC with chemotherapy vs TMT and yielded a HR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.28-0.67, p<0.001) favoring RC with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly and very elderly patients, radical cystectomy is associated with virtually half the CSM rate than radiotherapy, regardless of concomitant chemotherapy administration.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 12
- $a karcinom z přechodných buněk $x farmakoterapie $x chirurgie $7 D002295
- 650 _2
- $a cystektomie $x metody $7 D015653
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a program SEER $7 D018426
- 650 _2
- $a močový měchýř $x patologie $7 D001743
- 650 12
- $a nádory močového měchýře $x radioterapie $x chirurgie $7 D001749
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Würnschimmel, Christoph $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Hoeh, Benedikt $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Sorce, Gabriele $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Chierigo, Francesco $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Flammia, Rocco Simone $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Tian, Zhe $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Saad, Fred $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Briganti, Alberto $u Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Sharokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- 700 1_
- $a Galucci, Michele $u Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Chun, Felix K H $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Graefen, Markus $u Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Karakiewicz, Pierre I $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 773 0_
- $w MED00188741 $t Clinical genitourinary cancer $x 1938-0682 $g Roč. 20, č. 1 (2022), s. 93.e1-93.e9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34620567 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804135623 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1822838 $s 1170653
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 20 $c 1 $d 93.e1-93.e9 $e 20210901 $i 1938-0682 $m Clinical genitourinary cancer $n Clin Genitourin Cancer $x MED00188741
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720