• Something wrong with this record ?

Nomogram Predicting Bladder Cancer-specific Mortality After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of an International Consortium

MC. Mir, M. Marchioni, H. Zargar, K. Zargar-Shoshtari, AS. Fairey, LS. Mertens, CP. Dinney, LM. Krabbe, MS. Cookson, NE. Jacobsen, J. Griffin, JS. Montgomery, N. Vasdev, EY. Yu, E. Xylinas, JS. McGrath, W. Kassouf, MA. Dall'Era, SS. Sridhar, J....

. 2021 ; 7 (6) : 1347-1354. [pub] 20200806

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is associated with improved overall and cancer-specific survival. The post-NAC pathological stage has previously been reported to be a major determinant of outcome. OBJECTIVE: To develop a postoperative nomogram for survival based on pathological and clinical parameters from an international consortium. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 2000 and 2015, 1866 patients with MIBC were treated at 19 institutions in the USA, Canada, and Europe. Analysis was limited to 640 patients with adequate follow-up who had received three or more cycles of NAC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A nomogram for bladder cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) was developed by multivariable Cox regression analysis. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the model's clinical utility. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 640 patients were identified. Downstaging to non-MIBC (ypT1, ypTa, and ypTis) occurred in 271 patients (42 %), and 113 (17 %) achieved a complete response (ypT0N0). The 5-yr BCSM was 47.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 41.2-52.6 %). On multivariable analysis, covariates with a statistically significant association with BCSM were lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.90 [95% CI: 1.4-2.6]; p < 0.001), positive surgical margins (HR 2.01 [95 % CI: 1.3-2.9]; p < 0.001), and pathological stage (with ypT0/Tis/Ta/T1 as reference: ypT2 [HR 2.77 {95 % CI: 1.7-4.6}; p < 0.001] and ypT3-4 [HR 5.9 {95 % CI: 3.8-9.3}; p < 0.001]). The area under the curve of the model predicting 5-yr BCSM after cross validation with 300 bootstraps was 75.4 % (95 % CI: 68.1-82.6 %). Decision curve analyses showed a modest net benefit for the use of the BCSM nomogram in the current cohort compared with the use of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging alone. Limitations include the retrospective study design and the lack of central pathology. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed and internally validated a nomogram predicting BCSM after NAC and radical cystectomy for MIBC. The nomogram will be useful for patient counseling and in the identification of patients at high risk for BCSM suitable for enrollment in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at the outcomes of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer in a large multi-institutional population. We found that we can accurately predict death after radical surgical treatment in patients treated with chemotherapy before surgery. We conclude that the pathological report provides key factors for determining survival probability.

Charles University Prag Czech Republic

Cross Cancer Institute Edmonton AB Canada

Department of Genitourinary Oncology H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa FL USA

Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA

Department of Medical Oral and Biotechnological Sciences Urology Unit University G d'Annunzio Chieti Pescara Italy

Department of Medicine Division of Oncology University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle WA USA

Department of Oncology University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

Department of Surgery Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust Exeter UK

Department of Surgery McGill University Health Center Montreal Canada

Department of Urologic Sciences University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada

Department of Urologic Surgery Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN USA

Department of Urology Cochin Hospital APHP Paris Descartes University Paris France

Department of Urology Freeman Hospital Newcastle Upon Tyne UK

Department of Urology MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna General Hospital Vienna Austria

Department of Urology RUSH University Chicago IL USA

Department of Urology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA USA

Department of Urology The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA

Department of Urology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Urology University of California at Davis Davis Medical Center Sacramento CA USA

Department of Urology University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City KS USA

Department of Urology University of Michigan Health System Ann Arbor MI USA

Department of Urology University of Münster Münster Germany

Department of Urology University of Oklahoma College of Medicine Oklahoma City OK USA

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA

Department of Urology University of Washington Seattle WA USA

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College Presbyterian Hospital New York NY USA

Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia Valencia Spain

Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA

Princess Margaret Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada

University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

University of Jordan Amman Jordan

USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center Institute of Urology University of Southern California Los Angeles CA USA

UT Southwestern Dallas TX USA

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22019644
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804135846.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2021 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.euf.2020.07.002 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32771446
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Mir, Maria Carmen $u Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain. Electronic address: mirmare@yahoo.es
245    10
$a Nomogram Predicting Bladder Cancer-specific Mortality After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of an International Consortium / $c MC. Mir, M. Marchioni, H. Zargar, K. Zargar-Shoshtari, AS. Fairey, LS. Mertens, CP. Dinney, LM. Krabbe, MS. Cookson, NE. Jacobsen, J. Griffin, JS. Montgomery, N. Vasdev, EY. Yu, E. Xylinas, JS. McGrath, W. Kassouf, MA. Dall'Era, SS. Sridhar, J. Aning, SF. Shariat, JL. Wright, AC. Thorpe, TM. Morgan, JM. Holzbeierlein, TJ. Bivalacqua, S. North, DA. Barocas, Y. Lotan, P. Grivas, AJ. Stephenson, JB. Shah, BW. van Rhijn, PE. Spiess, D. Daneshmand, PC. Black
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is associated with improved overall and cancer-specific survival. The post-NAC pathological stage has previously been reported to be a major determinant of outcome. OBJECTIVE: To develop a postoperative nomogram for survival based on pathological and clinical parameters from an international consortium. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 2000 and 2015, 1866 patients with MIBC were treated at 19 institutions in the USA, Canada, and Europe. Analysis was limited to 640 patients with adequate follow-up who had received three or more cycles of NAC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A nomogram for bladder cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) was developed by multivariable Cox regression analysis. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the model's clinical utility. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 640 patients were identified. Downstaging to non-MIBC (ypT1, ypTa, and ypTis) occurred in 271 patients (42 %), and 113 (17 %) achieved a complete response (ypT0N0). The 5-yr BCSM was 47.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 41.2-52.6 %). On multivariable analysis, covariates with a statistically significant association with BCSM were lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.90 [95% CI: 1.4-2.6]; p < 0.001), positive surgical margins (HR 2.01 [95 % CI: 1.3-2.9]; p < 0.001), and pathological stage (with ypT0/Tis/Ta/T1 as reference: ypT2 [HR 2.77 {95 % CI: 1.7-4.6}; p < 0.001] and ypT3-4 [HR 5.9 {95 % CI: 3.8-9.3}; p < 0.001]). The area under the curve of the model predicting 5-yr BCSM after cross validation with 300 bootstraps was 75.4 % (95 % CI: 68.1-82.6 %). Decision curve analyses showed a modest net benefit for the use of the BCSM nomogram in the current cohort compared with the use of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging alone. Limitations include the retrospective study design and the lack of central pathology. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed and internally validated a nomogram predicting BCSM after NAC and radical cystectomy for MIBC. The nomogram will be useful for patient counseling and in the identification of patients at high risk for BCSM suitable for enrollment in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at the outcomes of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer in a large multi-institutional population. We found that we can accurately predict death after radical surgical treatment in patients treated with chemotherapy before surgery. We conclude that the pathological report provides key factors for determining survival probability.
650    12
$a cystektomie $x metody $7 D015653
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a svaly $x patologie $7 D009132
650    _2
$a neoadjuvantní terapie $x metody $7 D020360
650    _2
$a nomogramy $7 D049451
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a nádory močového měchýře $x farmakoterapie $x chirurgie $7 D001749
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Marchioni, Michele $u Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Urology Unit, University "G. d'Annunzio", Chieti-Pescara, Italy
700    1_
$a Zargar, Homi $u Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
700    1_
$a Zargar-Shoshtari, K $u Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
700    1_
$a Fairey, A S $u University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
700    1_
$a Mertens, Laura S $u Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Dinney, C P $u Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
700    1_
$a Krabbe, L M $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
700    1_
$a Cookson, M S $u Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
700    1_
$a Jacobsen, N E $u University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
700    1_
$a Griffin, J $u Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
700    1_
$a Montgomery, J S $u Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
700    1_
$a Vasdev, N $u Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
700    1_
$a Yu, E Y $u Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
700    1_
$a Xylinas, E $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
700    1_
$a McGrath, J S $u Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
700    1_
$a Kassouf, W $u Department of Surgery (Division of Urology), McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
700    1_
$a Dall'Era, M A $u Department of Urology, University of California at Davis, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
700    1_
$a Sridhar, S S $u Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
700    1_
$a Aning, J $u Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
700    1_
$a Shariat, S F $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic; University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
700    1_
$a Wright, J L $u Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
700    1_
$a Thorpe, A C $u Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
700    1_
$a Morgan, T M $u Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
700    1_
$a Holzbeierlein, J M $u Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
700    1_
$a Bivalacqua, T J $u Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
700    1_
$a North, S $u Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
700    1_
$a Barocas, D A $u Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
700    1_
$a Lotan, Y $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
700    1_
$a Grivas, P $u Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
700    1_
$a Stephenson, A J $u Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Urology, RUSH University, Chicago, IL, USA
700    1_
$a Shah, J B $u Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
700    1_
$a van Rhijn, B W $u Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Spiess, P E $u Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
700    1_
$a Daneshmand, D $u USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
700    1_
$a Black, P C $u Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
773    0_
$w MED00193513 $t European urology focus $x 2405-4569 $g Roč. 7, č. 6 (2021), s. 1347-1354
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32771446 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804135839 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1823022 $s 1170887
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 7 $c 6 $d 1347-1354 $e 20200806 $i 2405-4569 $m European urology focus $n Eur Urol Focus $x MED00193513
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...