-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Lapidus arthrodesis in combination with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint-biomechanical cadaver study comparing two methods of fixation
R. Kunovsky, J. Kocis, T. Navrat, P. Vosynek, T. Pink, M. Joukal, I. Cizmar
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
PubMed
33976433
DOI
10.5507/bp.2021.025
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- artrodéza * metody MeSH
- biomechanika MeSH
- kostní destičky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metatarzofalangeální kloub * chirurgie MeSH
- mrtvola MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
AIMS: To assess the results of a biomechanical test of cadaveric specimens, comparing 2 methods of fixation of modified Lapidus arthrodesis in combination with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. METHODS: A total of 12 cadaveric specimens were used in the test. Arthrodesis of the first MTP joint was in all patients fixed with a Variable Angle LCP 1st MTP Fusion Plate 2.4/2.7. Two methods of fixation of the Lapidus arthrodesis were compared, i.e. fixation with two screws in the PS (plate-screw) version versus fixation with X-Locking Plate 2.4/2.7 in the PP (plate-plate) version. Measurements were obtained with the use of a testing machine ZWICK Z 020-TND with an optical device Mercury RT for measuring deformities. Each specimen was subjected to 3 loading options, a. displacement 5 mm, the support is placed under the proximal phalanx, b. displacement 5 mm, the support is placed under the first metatarsal head and c. load to failure, the support is placed under the first metatarsal head. RESULTS: In all specimens the PS construct showed a statistically considerably higher stiffness than the PP construct. In all specimens treated with the PP construct the load to failure was lower than in the PS construct. For loading mode a., at a significance level of 0.05 (P<0.05), the P-value was 0.036, for mode b. the P-value was 0.007 and for loading mode c. the P-value was 0.006. In addition, age-related decrease in stiffness of the specimen was proved at a significance level of 5% (P=0.004). CONCLUSION: In all the three loading modes, the PS (plate-screw) construct showed a statistically higher stiffness than the PP (plate-plate) construct.
Department of Clinical Orthopedics Trauma Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Department of Trauma Surgery Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Educational Center for Practical Anatomy Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Anatomy Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22022918
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230118155257.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221007s2022 xr ad f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2021.025 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33976433
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Kunovský, Radek $u Department of Clinical Orthopedics, Trauma Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0107045
- 245 10
- $a Lapidus arthrodesis in combination with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint-biomechanical cadaver study comparing two methods of fixation / $c R. Kunovsky, J. Kocis, T. Navrat, P. Vosynek, T. Pink, M. Joukal, I. Cizmar
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: To assess the results of a biomechanical test of cadaveric specimens, comparing 2 methods of fixation of modified Lapidus arthrodesis in combination with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. METHODS: A total of 12 cadaveric specimens were used in the test. Arthrodesis of the first MTP joint was in all patients fixed with a Variable Angle LCP 1st MTP Fusion Plate 2.4/2.7. Two methods of fixation of the Lapidus arthrodesis were compared, i.e. fixation with two screws in the PS (plate-screw) version versus fixation with X-Locking Plate 2.4/2.7 in the PP (plate-plate) version. Measurements were obtained with the use of a testing machine ZWICK Z 020-TND with an optical device Mercury RT for measuring deformities. Each specimen was subjected to 3 loading options, a. displacement 5 mm, the support is placed under the proximal phalanx, b. displacement 5 mm, the support is placed under the first metatarsal head and c. load to failure, the support is placed under the first metatarsal head. RESULTS: In all specimens the PS construct showed a statistically considerably higher stiffness than the PP construct. In all specimens treated with the PP construct the load to failure was lower than in the PS construct. For loading mode a., at a significance level of 0.05 (P<0.05), the P-value was 0.036, for mode b. the P-value was 0.007 and for loading mode c. the P-value was 0.006. In addition, age-related decrease in stiffness of the specimen was proved at a significance level of 5% (P=0.004). CONCLUSION: In all the three loading modes, the PS (plate-screw) construct showed a statistically higher stiffness than the PP (plate-plate) construct.
- 650 12
- $a artrodéza $x metody $7 D001174
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a kostní destičky $7 D001860
- 650 _2
- $a mrtvola $7 D002102
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a metatarzofalangeální kloub $x chirurgie $7 D008683
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kočiš, Ján $u Department of Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0081819
- 700 1_
- $a Návrat, Tomáš, $u Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University, Brno, Czech Republic $d 1978- $7 mzk2005279266
- 700 1_
- $a Vosynek, Petr, $u Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University, Brno, Czech Republic $d 1984- $7 xx0099644
- 700 1_
- $a Pink, Tomáš, $u Department of Clinical Orthopedics, Trauma Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $d 1971- $7 xx0103364
- 700 1_
- $a Joukal, Marek, $u Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $d 1987- $7 mzk2012725317
- 700 1_
- $a Cizmar, Igor $u Educational Center for Practical Anatomy, Brno, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia $x 1804-7521 $g Roč. 166, č. 3 (2022), s. 334-342
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33976433 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221007 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230118155252 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1885624 $s 1174204
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 166 $c 3 $d 334-342 $e 20210511 $i 1804-7521 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
- LZP __
- $b NLK138 $a Pubmed-20221007