Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Reliability and validity of 30-15 intermittent fitness test for cardiorespiratory fitness assessment among infantry members of Slovenian armed forces: A study protocol

AH. Paravlic, B. Simunic, R. Pisot, S. Rauter, J. Vodicar

. 2022 ; 13 (-) : 894186. [pub] 20220722

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Introduction: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) testing is routinely performed by most armed and tactical forces around the world as part of their recruitment process for new members or simply as an annual examination of their personnel. A 2-mile run (2MR) test is among the most commonly used. However, as it is performed outdoors, weather, climate, and terrain can influence the results and often limit the maximum performance. Also, this test has been shown to be difficult for individuals because the pacing strategy is self-paced. As such, it does not reflect the real situation on the battlefield, where most activities are externally driven by the environment and the enemy. Therefore, we believe that the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test (30-15IFT) may be a suitable tool for measuring CRF and battle readiness of military personnel. Moreover, given the importance of visual attention to military personnel we aim to investigate the differences in visual attention between better and less physically prepared infantry members and its corresponding response to maximal endurance running test. Methods and analysis: This randomized cross-over study using a within-subjects test-retest design will enroll 32 infantry members of the Slovenian Armed Forces. To investigate the reliability and validity of the 30-15IFT test, an incremental treadmill test (TR), a 2MR test, and two identical 30-15IFT will be performed in randomized order. Additionally, participants will be subsequently divided into two groups based on their score on the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT), whereas differences in visual attention will be assessed by using the d2 test. The primary analysis will assess differences in key physiological outcomes between the different CRF tests (TR vs. 2MR vs. 30-15IFT). In addition, the relative reliability of all dependent variables between two 30-15IFT trials will be estimated by interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), while relationship between maximal oxygen uptake, heart rate and maximal running speed of 30-15IFT, TR and 2MR will be assessed using Pearson's correlation. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the National Medical Ethics Committee (reference number: 0120-495/2021/6). The results of the proposed study will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals. Clinical Trial Registration: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT05218798].

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22023678
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031095121.0
007      
ta
008      
221010s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894186 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35936328
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Paravlic, Armin H $u Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia $u Institute for Kinesiology Research, Science and Research Centre, Koper, Slovenia $u Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
245    10
$a Reliability and validity of 30-15 intermittent fitness test for cardiorespiratory fitness assessment among infantry members of Slovenian armed forces: A study protocol / $c AH. Paravlic, B. Simunic, R. Pisot, S. Rauter, J. Vodicar
520    9_
$a Introduction: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) testing is routinely performed by most armed and tactical forces around the world as part of their recruitment process for new members or simply as an annual examination of their personnel. A 2-mile run (2MR) test is among the most commonly used. However, as it is performed outdoors, weather, climate, and terrain can influence the results and often limit the maximum performance. Also, this test has been shown to be difficult for individuals because the pacing strategy is self-paced. As such, it does not reflect the real situation on the battlefield, where most activities are externally driven by the environment and the enemy. Therefore, we believe that the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test (30-15IFT) may be a suitable tool for measuring CRF and battle readiness of military personnel. Moreover, given the importance of visual attention to military personnel we aim to investigate the differences in visual attention between better and less physically prepared infantry members and its corresponding response to maximal endurance running test. Methods and analysis: This randomized cross-over study using a within-subjects test-retest design will enroll 32 infantry members of the Slovenian Armed Forces. To investigate the reliability and validity of the 30-15IFT test, an incremental treadmill test (TR), a 2MR test, and two identical 30-15IFT will be performed in randomized order. Additionally, participants will be subsequently divided into two groups based on their score on the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT), whereas differences in visual attention will be assessed by using the d2 test. The primary analysis will assess differences in key physiological outcomes between the different CRF tests (TR vs. 2MR vs. 30-15IFT). In addition, the relative reliability of all dependent variables between two 30-15IFT trials will be estimated by interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), while relationship between maximal oxygen uptake, heart rate and maximal running speed of 30-15IFT, TR and 2MR will be assessed using Pearson's correlation. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the National Medical Ethics Committee (reference number: 0120-495/2021/6). The results of the proposed study will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals. Clinical Trial Registration: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT05218798].
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Simunic, Bostjan $u Institute for Kinesiology Research, Science and Research Centre, Koper, Slovenia
700    1_
$a Pisot, Rado $u Institute for Kinesiology Research, Science and Research Centre, Koper, Slovenia
700    1_
$a Rauter, Samo $u Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
700    1_
$a Vodicar, Janez $u Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
773    0_
$w MED00174603 $t Frontiers in psychology $x 1664-1078 $g Roč. 13, č. - (2022), s. 894186
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35936328 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20221010 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031095119 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1853971 $s 1174966
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 13 $c - $d 894186 $e 20220722 $i 1664-1078 $m Frontiers in psychology $n Front Psychol $x MED00174603
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221010

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...