Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Do different multi-segment foot models detect the same changes in kinematics when wearing foot orthoses

T. Klein, GJ. Chapman, O. Lastovicka, M. Janura, J. Richards

. 2022 ; 15 (1) : 68. [pub] 20220908

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22024451

Grantová podpora
IGA_FTK_2018_014 Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci

BACKGROUND: Different multi-segment foot models have been used to explore the effect of foot orthoses. Previous studies have compared the kinematic output of different multi-segment foot models, however, no study has explored if different multi-segment foot models detect similar kinematic changes when wearing a foot orthoses. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of two different multi-segment foot models to detect kinematic changes at the hindfoot and forefoot during the single and double support phases of gait when wearing a foot orthosis. METHODS: Foot kinematics were collected during walking from a sample of 32 individuals with and without a foot orthosis with a medial heel bar using an eight-camera motion capture system. The Oxford Foot Model (OFM) and a multi-segment foot model using the Calibrated Anatomical System Technique (CAST) were applied simultaneously. Vector field statistical analysis was used to explore the kinematic effects of a medial heel bar using the two models, and the ability of the models to detect any changes in kinematics was compared. RESULTS: For the hindfoot, both models showed very good agreement of the effect of the foot orthosis across all three anatomical planes during the single and double support phases. However, for the forefoot, the level of agreement between the models varied with both models showing good agreement of the effect in the coronal plane but poorer agreement in the transverse and sagittal planes. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that while consistency exists across both models for the hindfoot and forefoot in the coronal plane, the forefoot in the transverse and sagittal planes showed inconsistent responses to the foot orthoses. This should be considered when interpreting the efficacy of different interventions which aim to change foot biomechanics.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22024451
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031100241.0
007      
ta
008      
221017s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s13047-022-00574-z $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36071489
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Klein, Tomas $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, třída Míru 117, Olomouc, 77147, Czech Republic. tomas.klein@upol.cz $1 https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/000000029216367X
245    10
$a Do different multi-segment foot models detect the same changes in kinematics when wearing foot orthoses / $c T. Klein, GJ. Chapman, O. Lastovicka, M. Janura, J. Richards
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Different multi-segment foot models have been used to explore the effect of foot orthoses. Previous studies have compared the kinematic output of different multi-segment foot models, however, no study has explored if different multi-segment foot models detect similar kinematic changes when wearing a foot orthoses. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of two different multi-segment foot models to detect kinematic changes at the hindfoot and forefoot during the single and double support phases of gait when wearing a foot orthosis. METHODS: Foot kinematics were collected during walking from a sample of 32 individuals with and without a foot orthosis with a medial heel bar using an eight-camera motion capture system. The Oxford Foot Model (OFM) and a multi-segment foot model using the Calibrated Anatomical System Technique (CAST) were applied simultaneously. Vector field statistical analysis was used to explore the kinematic effects of a medial heel bar using the two models, and the ability of the models to detect any changes in kinematics was compared. RESULTS: For the hindfoot, both models showed very good agreement of the effect of the foot orthosis across all three anatomical planes during the single and double support phases. However, for the forefoot, the level of agreement between the models varied with both models showing good agreement of the effect in the coronal plane but poorer agreement in the transverse and sagittal planes. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that while consistency exists across both models for the hindfoot and forefoot in the coronal plane, the forefoot in the transverse and sagittal planes showed inconsistent responses to the foot orthoses. This should be considered when interpreting the efficacy of different interventions which aim to change foot biomechanics.
650    _2
$a biomechanika $x fyziologie $7 D001696
650    _2
$a noha (od hlezna dolů) $x fyziologie $7 D005528
650    12
$a ortézy nohy (od hlezna dolů) $7 D061826
650    _2
$a chůze (způsob) $x fyziologie $7 D005684
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a chůze $x fyziologie $7 D016138
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Chapman, Graham J $u Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK
700    1_
$a Lastovicka, Ondrej $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, třída Míru 117, Olomouc, 77147, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Janura, Miroslav $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, třída Míru 117, Olomouc, 77147, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Richards, Jim $u Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK
773    0_
$w MED00165309 $t Journal of foot and ankle research $x 1757-1146 $g Roč. 15, č. 1 (2022), s. 68
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36071489 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221017 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031100239 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1854265 $s 1175741
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 15 $c 1 $d 68 $e 20220908 $i 1757-1146 $m Journal of foot and ankle research $n J. foot ankle res. $x MED00165309
GRA    __
$a IGA_FTK_2018_014 $p Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221017

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...