-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Do different multi-segment foot models detect the same changes in kinematics when wearing foot orthoses
T. Klein, GJ. Chapman, O. Lastovicka, M. Janura, J. Richards
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
IGA_FTK_2018_014
Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2008-01-12 do 2023-01-12
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2008
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2008
Free Medical Journals
od 2008
PubMed Central
od 2008
Europe PubMed Central
od 2008
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2008-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
Wiley Free Content
od 2008
Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
od 2008
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2008
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2008-12-01 do 2023-12-31
- MeSH
- biomechanika fyziologie MeSH
- chůze (způsob) fyziologie MeSH
- chůze fyziologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- noha (od hlezna dolů) fyziologie MeSH
- ortézy nohy (od hlezna dolů) * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Different multi-segment foot models have been used to explore the effect of foot orthoses. Previous studies have compared the kinematic output of different multi-segment foot models, however, no study has explored if different multi-segment foot models detect similar kinematic changes when wearing a foot orthoses. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of two different multi-segment foot models to detect kinematic changes at the hindfoot and forefoot during the single and double support phases of gait when wearing a foot orthosis. METHODS: Foot kinematics were collected during walking from a sample of 32 individuals with and without a foot orthosis with a medial heel bar using an eight-camera motion capture system. The Oxford Foot Model (OFM) and a multi-segment foot model using the Calibrated Anatomical System Technique (CAST) were applied simultaneously. Vector field statistical analysis was used to explore the kinematic effects of a medial heel bar using the two models, and the ability of the models to detect any changes in kinematics was compared. RESULTS: For the hindfoot, both models showed very good agreement of the effect of the foot orthosis across all three anatomical planes during the single and double support phases. However, for the forefoot, the level of agreement between the models varied with both models showing good agreement of the effect in the coronal plane but poorer agreement in the transverse and sagittal planes. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that while consistency exists across both models for the hindfoot and forefoot in the coronal plane, the forefoot in the transverse and sagittal planes showed inconsistent responses to the foot orthoses. This should be considered when interpreting the efficacy of different interventions which aim to change foot biomechanics.
Allied Health Research Unit University of Central Lancashire Preston PR1 2HE UK
Faculty of Physical Culture Palacký University Olomouc třída Míru 117 Olomouc 77147 Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22024451
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031100241.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s13047-022-00574-z $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36071489
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Klein, Tomas $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, třída Míru 117, Olomouc, 77147, Czech Republic. tomas.klein@upol.cz $1 https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/000000029216367X
- 245 10
- $a Do different multi-segment foot models detect the same changes in kinematics when wearing foot orthoses / $c T. Klein, GJ. Chapman, O. Lastovicka, M. Janura, J. Richards
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Different multi-segment foot models have been used to explore the effect of foot orthoses. Previous studies have compared the kinematic output of different multi-segment foot models, however, no study has explored if different multi-segment foot models detect similar kinematic changes when wearing a foot orthoses. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of two different multi-segment foot models to detect kinematic changes at the hindfoot and forefoot during the single and double support phases of gait when wearing a foot orthosis. METHODS: Foot kinematics were collected during walking from a sample of 32 individuals with and without a foot orthosis with a medial heel bar using an eight-camera motion capture system. The Oxford Foot Model (OFM) and a multi-segment foot model using the Calibrated Anatomical System Technique (CAST) were applied simultaneously. Vector field statistical analysis was used to explore the kinematic effects of a medial heel bar using the two models, and the ability of the models to detect any changes in kinematics was compared. RESULTS: For the hindfoot, both models showed very good agreement of the effect of the foot orthosis across all three anatomical planes during the single and double support phases. However, for the forefoot, the level of agreement between the models varied with both models showing good agreement of the effect in the coronal plane but poorer agreement in the transverse and sagittal planes. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that while consistency exists across both models for the hindfoot and forefoot in the coronal plane, the forefoot in the transverse and sagittal planes showed inconsistent responses to the foot orthoses. This should be considered when interpreting the efficacy of different interventions which aim to change foot biomechanics.
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $x fyziologie $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a noha (od hlezna dolů) $x fyziologie $7 D005528
- 650 12
- $a ortézy nohy (od hlezna dolů) $7 D061826
- 650 _2
- $a chůze (způsob) $x fyziologie $7 D005684
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a chůze $x fyziologie $7 D016138
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Chapman, Graham J $u Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Lastovicka, Ondrej $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, třída Míru 117, Olomouc, 77147, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Janura, Miroslav $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, třída Míru 117, Olomouc, 77147, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Richards, Jim $u Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK
- 773 0_
- $w MED00165309 $t Journal of foot and ankle research $x 1757-1146 $g Roč. 15, č. 1 (2022), s. 68
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36071489 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031100239 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854265 $s 1175741
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 15 $c 1 $d 68 $e 20220908 $i 1757-1146 $m Journal of foot and ankle research $n J. foot ankle res. $x MED00165309
- GRA __
- $a IGA_FTK_2018_014 $p Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017